Dara O brian....... ummmmmmmm
curlynurse69
Posts: 35
Forum Member
✭
I cant watch the apprentice, you`re fired as I just sit there waiting for dara o brian to go uummm! Which he does too much, especially after he thinks he is funny, The funnier he thinks he was, the louder, bigger and longer the uuuummmmmmmmmmmm!!!! Can`t bare it!!!! :mad:
0
Comments
The 'Errrrrrrrrrrrrrr' thing doesn't bother me, but I did prefer Adrian Chiles as a host.
His lead up to a joke comes across as so staged and rehearsed.
I may be wrong but I thought they all watched a screening of the show, with the audience, before they go on to discuss the show on Your Fired?
Dara's 'Ehhhhhhhhhhhrrrr's do seem to be getting longer, but I still enjoy the show.
did you see the vignette with the drawn on Werewolf fangs and fur for the girls? Wow, just amazed that there are people out there who would actually approve that to go on air. It's just one of the most unfunniest programmes ever, and that's a shame because the main show is great.
Sara Cox was annoying, not at all funny.
he is very funny and is much better than Chiles
I have noticed that too and it puzzles me the way the audience play along. Panel member says something mildly amusing and gets a polite laugh ..... Dara repeats it in his bumbling fashion, maybe elaborates a tiny bit and adds his Irish accent into the mix and they are all laughing like hyenas
I'm going to see a recording of his Science Club show soon so I will watch out for the umm's there.
Canned laughter
Just watch the final scene in any Top Gear. One of the presenters will drop a "bomb shell" and the assembled audience will erupt with howls of laughter - while the picture shows them standing there looking completely bored with their mouths shut.
It's a great release after the tension of the episode, though not on repeat viewing. When I see it again I usually sit there stone-faced.
dara just speaks way to fast. he can be quite funny but he tries to hard and just becomes annoying when he is gabbling fifty words a minute with lots of umms and errs. i really much preferred adrian chiles. with the brilliant job he does with his interview show i would love to see graham norton do it. he is a delight to watch and a very skilled interviewer
I prefer Adrian Chiles too. The humour was a bit drier in my opinion and more conversationally observational if that makes sense.
Oh well, it is what it is, errrrrrrrrrrrrr :-D
Firstly, there are now two comedians, and often the guest who is unused to television gets overshadowed by Dara.
Then the specialist guest often gets elbowed out. It would be nice to hear more of the inside track on how new beers are normally developed, launched and sold, for instance, to illuminate where the losing team went wrong.
Quite what is the point of the middle panellist, the celebrity Apprentice-fan, has always eluded me. For the most part, they fail to entertain or inform.
Ideally (imo) the programme would combine comedy with some serious analysis of the task -- just how hard were the sums that flummoxed the women? Should it have been obvious that the Kent beer festival was a waste of hops, or were they just unlucky? -- and maybe a look at the team dynamics.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfGxxf_WHvM