Digital Spy

Search Digital Spy
 

DS Forums

 
 

This Morning accidentally broadcast Kate Middleton pics


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 13-02-2013, 18:05
Creamtea
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,405
Accidentally on purpose

or accidentally sheer incompetance?
The former, I bet.
Creamtea is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 13-02-2013, 18:14
rfonzo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 6,865
Accidentally on purpose

or accidentally sheer incompetance?
That is exactly what I was thinking.
rfonzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2013, 18:55
occy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sussex
Posts: 23,124
Never mind. Know one has died. Both equal now. 1 for Phillip and Holly and 1 for Eamonn and Ruth.
occy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2013, 19:53
pinkyponk34
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,190
Kate's snap was a very small part of the Mag cover, the Mag cover was a small part of the screen, and the cover was on screen for 3 seconds.

It's hard to get that outraged at a " mistake " by a Vision Mixer.
pinkyponk34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2013, 19:58
BellaRosa
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Getting OP's cell ready.
Posts: 19,146
True.

It'll get more nauseating when Kate has the baby
Yes .. will are going to have years of this I had no interest in the wedding, same goes for the baby
BellaRosa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-02-2013, 14:47
jackbell
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,110
I am convinced that the reason for the mistake was because the photo is just so ordinary and boring they were overlooked. I swear had the British media not been so sensitive about it, and the pics had been printed over here, no-one would have batted an eyelid.

If the shot were topless or very heavily pregnant I could understand it, but they are just ... nothing.
jackbell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-02-2013, 15:47
ftv
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 22,698
The woman was in public walking on a beach where there were other tourists. One took pictures of her. Where is the intrusion ?
ftv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-02-2013, 15:53
lundavra
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 15,512
The woman was in public walking on a beach where there were other tourists. One took pictures of her. Where is the intrusion ?
Mustique is a privately owned island, I would not be surprised if there was some sort of condition of photography for personal use only because of the type of people staying there. I think many are very suspicious about the claims that the photographs were taken by an ordinary tourist.
lundavra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-02-2013, 15:55
lundavra
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 15,512
Have you seen the incriminating pic? What a lot of fuss over nothing.
It does not matter, they were taken without permission on private property for profit only. There is no public interest reason for buying and printing them.
lundavra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-02-2013, 16:01
lundavra
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 15,512
Why do people insist on calling her Kate Middleton - this has not been her name for over year. She does not use it so why do others, especially ITV
I think people don't like using 'Duke of ....' or 'Duchess of ....", if she was a Princess then that would be used. Prince William is not often popularly called 'The Duke of Cambridge'. Even Prince Philip tends to be called that more than the 'Duke of Edinburgh'. Charlie's mistress is usually 'Camilla' rather than the Duchess of whatever.
lundavra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-02-2013, 16:01
barbeler
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,969
Do you mean that there are people who actually care about this?
barbeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-02-2013, 16:05
ftv
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 22,698
Does This Morning actually have an editor ? If so he/she is running a very sloppy ship and perhaps a change of captain is needed. Rather like TOS journalism is not exactly their strong point.
ftv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-02-2013, 21:51
Nathan Barley
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5
I should imagine behinds the cameras on This Morning is not dissimilar to back stage at a school panto.
Nathan Barley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-02-2013, 22:49
Rowan Hedge
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,672
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#axzz2KIjJ7000

This programme had turned into a complete and utter shambles over the past few months. First listgate and now this. I wonder if it will be taken off the air? We can only hope
I'm surprised anyone other than the ahem fans give a damn, she like him is an insignificant nonsense.
Rowan Hedge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2013, 00:25
OpEd
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 532
...because of the type of people staying there.
Useless idle kuntz.
OpEd is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:50.