No I have said she moves in to fast but that doesn't mean she slept with him... There is NO evidence she did
So to use one of her ex's as an example, when she got together with Alex and moved him into her house a few days after meeting him he was sleeping in a separate room was he?
So by being in the company of a bloke she must of been sleeping with them....
And I would NEVER claim Peter n Emily's baby isn't his... Id find that distasteful
No one said you did say that- you said you would never dream of saying it and we were pointing out that no one would say it anyway due to the different scenarios....
If she hadn't lied then there would be no speculation. And she HAS lied. You can't deny it - either in the Daybreak interview by pretending she was further along than she was or after the birth when she claimed he was eight weeks prem. She CAN'T have been telling the truth both times- it simply doesn't add up. I'm no Peter fan but there weren't pictures of Emily snuggling up to two different men around the time of conception.
Exactly. KP got pregnant right at the beginning of her relationship with Kev, and she was seen socialising with another man during that very early period, and for all we know, there may have been others. KP literally moves from one man to the next like she's on a conveyor belt, and has unprotected sex with them. Add that to the conflicting information she's been giving out throughout her pregnancy and it's no wonder people are confused and speculating.
Again, I repeat myself, EMILY has never given anyone any cause to stop and think that the baby couldn't be his, has she?
No.
You can use other celebs to do comparisons you know, not the same old ex each and every time Betty.
And AGAIN that doesn't stop me saying she MIGHT of slept with another bloke does it ?? Doesn't make it true but I can still say it can't I. Just because you haven't seen a pic of her with another man doesn't mean it isn't possible
As for telling me off for using Peter... I will do so if and when I want..it's not against the rules and when others are told not to do so I will comply
Disclaimer...I do not for one second think Emily has been cheating on Peter .. And I wish them all the best with their baby.
So to use one of her ex's as an example, when she got together with Alex and moved him into her house a few days after meeting him he was sleeping in a separate room was he?
And you seem to be agreeing she got pregnant mid December and the first evidence of her being with Kevin is around the 14th - she was getting drunk and holding hands with Gavin on the 9th! That's pretty fast work....(that's to BB btw - not you Badcat).
And you seem to be agreeing she got pregnant mid December and the first evidence of her being with Kevin is around the 14th - she was getting drunk and holding hands with Gavin on the 9th! That's pretty fast work....(that's to BB btw - not you Badcat).
I've always said she got pregnant in dec... And just cos the first time she was seen with Keiron was 14th doesn't mean that the first time she dated him
And you seem to be agreeing she got pregnant mid December and the first evidence of her being with Kevin is around the 14th - she was getting drunk and holding hands with Gavin on the 9th! That's pretty fast work....(that's to BB btw - not you Badcat).
I agree it's a puzzle, up until the very end everything was consistent with the earlier due date. I wonder whether both Sun exclusives could have actually been written after the baby was born and they took advantage of his low birth weight to say he was more premature than he was so as to remove any doubt about the paternity but they hadn't counted on people date-checking? It might also be to try to lessen criticism about travelling abroad so late in her pregnancy. So the rough sequence of events could have been true but the first report could have been published after the birth, there was over a weeks time lag to it being reported. There's no way of independently verifying without knowing where it happened but the actual birth date would have to eventually appear on the birth certificate. Just theorising! Tis a mystery ...
My theory is she doesn't write her Sun column, whoever does would probably have been the contact who spoke to her or someone around her briefly for this story - they have invented a lot of it around it all, and that's why its probably only loosely based on fact.
And AGAIN that doesn't stop me saying she MIGHT of slept with another bloke does it ?? Doesn't make it true but I can still say it can't I. Just because you haven't seen a pic of her with another man doesn't mean it isn't possible
As for telling me off for using Peter... I will do so if and when I want..it's not against the rules and when others are told not to do so I will comply
Disclaimer...I do not for one second think Emily has been cheating on Peter .. And I wish them all the best with their baby.
Of course not! You have every right to say that! But you do run the risk of looking very silly and as if you are scraping around the bottom of your barrel for something to fire back at those who are just presenting you with logical reasons as to why, as an argument, it falls under 'lame' and 'fail.
For it to be a valid argument, Emily would need to have behaved in the same way that KP publicly has. 'Publicly' is the key word here.
That's not proof he told his dad of her pregnancy...just proof he was talking about it to his dad..
Do you have proof that katie informed Peter about her pregnancy and marriage? Not media speculation... Peter isn't stupid to comment on media speculation when it comes to Katie as he knows what the media is like and that Katie may take offence. He seems to only release statements to inform that he has not spoken about or did media interviews on certain subjects.
Do you have proof that this was not the first time Peter was informed?
None of us know the truth only what we are fed.
What we do know is the conversation at the time happened. It was obvious to all watching at the time that Peter was uncomfortable, and the majority on DS stated this should not have been recorded.
My life - Peter Andre - skipt to 17:13 http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xYRUNGa2hMo&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DxYRUNGa2hMo
And AGAIN that doesn't stop me saying she MIGHT of slept with another bloke does it ?? Doesn't make it true but I can still say it can't I. Just because you haven't seen a pic of her with another man doesn't mean it isn't possible
As for telling me off for using Peter... I will do so if and when I want..it's not against the rules and when others are told not to do so I will comply
Disclaimer...I do not for one second think Emily has been cheating on Peter .. And I wish them all the best with their baby.
*le sigh*
BIB - But WHY would you want to even post suggesting that a pregnant woman MAY of slept with another man Betty "just because I can post it" when that woman has NEVER given any indication in her past as being someone who enjoys the company of lots of different men in quick succession (especially when drink is involved), has boasted of her sexual conquests and has stated she refers unprotected sex and has been desperate to get pregnant for a long time and never given justification for someone posting something like that?
It's KP's fault for adding fuel to the fire Betty.
None of us know the truth only what we are fed.
What we do know is the conversation at the time happened. It was obvious to all watching at the time that Peter was uncomfortable, and the majority on DS stated this should not have been recorded.
My life - Peter Andre - skipt to 17:13 http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xYRUNGa2hMo&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DxYRUNGa2hMo
Oh yeah. So uncomfortable he used it on his show and then used his CANbot mouthpiece to say what he didn't have the balls to say himself.
I've always said she got pregnant in dec... And just cos the first time she was seen with Keiron was 14th doesn't mean that the first time she dated him
So she was getting drunk and holding hands with Gavin while dating Keiron? Classy bird.
My theory is she doesn't write her Sun column, whoever does would probably have been the contact who spoke to her or someone around her briefly for this story - they have invented a lot of it around it all, and that's why its probably only loosely based on fact.
I can't believe you are sticking to this theory- she was quoted verbatim which puts her in a position to sue and even if she has no time for instigating legal action at the moment you can bet there would have been a few tweets if they had "invented" it. And of course she doesn't "write" her columns- have you seen her appalling grammar and spelling on Twitter? She does what most "celeb columnists" do and speaks to them on the phone.
Of course not! You have every right to say that! But you do run the risk of looking very silly and as if you are scraping around the bottom of your barrel for something to fire back at those who are just presenting you with logical reasons as to why, as an argument, it falls under 'lame' and 'fail.
For it to be a valid argument, Emily would need to have behaved in the same way that KP publicly has. 'Publicly' is the key word here.
I'm not bothered about "looking silly" nor am I scraping any barrels ... I'd say those who are so desperate to find evidence this baby isn't her husbands are doing that.
And people having affairs usually do it behind closed doors ... Not in public
I'm not bothered about "looking silly" nor am I scraping any barrels ... I'd say those who are so desperate to find evidence this baby isn't her husbands are doing that.
And people having affairs usually do it behind closed doors ... Not in public
BIB - But WHY would you want to even post suggesting that a pregnant woman MAY of slept with another man Betty "just because I can post it" when that woman has NEVER given any indication in her past as being someone who enjoys the company of lots of different men in quick succession (especially when drink is involved), has boasted of her sexual conquests and has stated she refers unprotected sex and has been desperate to get pregnant for a long time and never given justification for someone posting something like that?
It's KP's fault for adding fuel to the fire Betty.
Again I will point out I was being flippant ... We know nothing about Emily because she isn't perusing the limelight .. So we can't and I wouldn't .. Claim to know anything about her habits when socialising..
I'm not bothered about "looking silly" nor am I scraping any barrels ... I'd say those who are so desperate to find evidence this baby isn't her husbands are doing that.
And people having affairs usually do it behind closed doors ... Not in public
If she moved rapidly on from Gavin to Keiron she was not having an affair. If she was seeing Keiron while getting drunk with Gavin and holding hands with him then it wasn't behind closed doors.
Oh yeah. So uncomfortable he used it on his show and then used his CANbot mouthpiece to say what he didn't have the balls to say himself.
He was uncomfortable. I agree that using mouthpieces as they did in footage was manipulative. He needs to step up and say "NO" and stop making himself look a fool.
I can't believe you are sticking to this theory- she was quoted verbatim which puts her in a position to sue and even if she has no time for instigating legal action at the moment you can bet there would have been a few tweets if they had "invented" it. And of course she doesn't "write" her columns- have you seen her appalling grammar and spelling on Twitter? She does what most "celeb columnists" do and speaks to them on the phone.
Of course they are quoting her verbatim - the key word there is "ghost writer" - they write as her. She agrees to it - so no legal action needed. The point is if they speak to her quickly, as you say, when a whole page (or even more) story has to be written obviously some parts are going to be more factual than others.
JAL1
I've seen the clip already..but thank ou for posting it .. I don't see any proof this was the first time he knew of her pregnancy..and I still believe this clip shouldn't of been put into the show
Of course they are quoting her verbatim - the key word there is "ghost writer" - they write as her. She agrees to it - so no legal action needed. The point is if they speak to her quickly, as you say, when a whole page (or even more) story has to be written obviously some parts are going to be more factual than others.
I think the due date of the baby is pretty crucial - don't you? And most of the story consisted of direct quotes.
I'm not bothered about "looking silly" nor am I scraping any barrels ... I'd say those who are so desperate to find evidence this baby isn't her husbands are doing that.
And people having affairs usually do it behind closed doors ... Not in public
No. KP did that by being seen with several men (in circumstances that are nothing to do with "going out with my long term male friends for a nice evening meal" scenario) at what could be now the possible date of conception.
And what I find disgusting is her being seen with another man out on the piss when she was meant to be seeing Kev. Or maybe I'm just old fashioned.
If she moved rapidly on from Gavin to Keiron she was not having an affair. If she was seeing Keiron while getting drunk with Gavin and holding hands with him then it wasn't behind closed doors.
Well article below she says they were dating 2 months before they got married in Jan so I would assume she WAS dating Kev when she was out with old Gavy boy. (but her idea of dating may be different from mine)
No. KP did that by being seen with several men (in circumstances that are nothing to do with "going out with my long term male friends for a nice evening meal" scenario) at what could be now the possible date of conception.
And what I find disgusting is her being seen with another man out on the piss when she was meant to be seeing Kev. Or maybe I'm just old fashioned.
So a woman can't be seen in the company of another man when she is dating someone else without people assuming they are sleeping with that man..a. Man she had been working with that day a man she sat with drinking whilst that mans friend was also there for half the time they were together ... In a restaurant I might add.then went home separately
I honestly thought those days were over and women were allowed to have male mates ...
I'm not bothered about "looking silly" nor am I scraping any barrels ... I'd say those who are so desperate to find evidence this baby isn't her husbands are doing that.
And people having affairs usually do it behind closed doors ... Not in public
WOW - it's amazing how savvy you are when it concerns Peter Andre but when it's the Queen of Trash you're resorting to the 'where's the evidence' line.
We here can only form an opinion based on what she has said in the past.
Yes no one here has any proof that she shagged all these men around the time she got knocked up but because of her past comments which other posters here have pointed out, it creates speculation and there's no smoke without fire after all.
As for this Emily - as others have said, there has been NO reason to speculate even whose child she is carrying whereas with the Pricey there was a doubt - that's why the speculation, threads, gossip etc.
IMO any male z list celeb she has been spotted with definitely gets a shag from her on the first date no doubt.
Comments
So to use one of her ex's as an example, when she got together with Alex and moved him into her house a few days after meeting him he was sleeping in a separate room was he?
No one said you did say that- you said you would never dream of saying it and we were pointing out that no one would say it anyway due to the different scenarios....
Exactly. KP got pregnant right at the beginning of her relationship with Kev, and she was seen socialising with another man during that very early period, and for all we know, there may have been others. KP literally moves from one man to the next like she's on a conveyor belt, and has unprotected sex with them. Add that to the conflicting information she's been giving out throughout her pregnancy and it's no wonder people are confused and speculating.
And AGAIN that doesn't stop me saying she MIGHT of slept with another bloke does it ?? Doesn't make it true but I can still say it can't I. Just because you haven't seen a pic of her with another man doesn't mean it isn't possible
As for telling me off for using Peter... I will do so if and when I want..it's not against the rules and when others are told not to do so I will comply
Disclaimer...I do not for one second think Emily has been cheating on Peter .. And I wish them all the best with their baby.
And you seem to be agreeing she got pregnant mid December and the first evidence of her being with Kevin is around the 14th - she was getting drunk and holding hands with Gavin on the 9th! That's pretty fast work....(that's to BB btw - not you Badcat).
I've always said she got pregnant in dec... And just cos the first time she was seen with Keiron was 14th doesn't mean that the first time she dated him
My theory is she doesn't write her Sun column, whoever does would probably have been the contact who spoke to her or someone around her briefly for this story - they have invented a lot of it around it all, and that's why its probably only loosely based on fact.
Of course not! You have every right to say that! But you do run the risk of looking very silly and as if you are scraping around the bottom of your barrel for something to fire back at those who are just presenting you with logical reasons as to why, as an argument, it falls under 'lame' and 'fail.
For it to be a valid argument, Emily would need to have behaved in the same way that KP publicly has. 'Publicly' is the key word here.
Do you have proof that katie informed Peter about her pregnancy and marriage? Not media speculation... Peter isn't stupid to comment on media speculation when it comes to Katie as he knows what the media is like and that Katie may take offence. He seems to only release statements to inform that he has not spoken about or did media interviews on certain subjects.
Do you have proof that this was not the first time Peter was informed?
None of us know the truth only what we are fed.
What we do know is the conversation at the time happened. It was obvious to all watching at the time that Peter was uncomfortable, and the majority on DS stated this should not have been recorded.
My life - Peter Andre - skipt to 17:13 http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xYRUNGa2hMo&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DxYRUNGa2hMo
*le sigh*
BIB - But WHY would you want to even post suggesting that a pregnant woman MAY of slept with another man Betty "just because I can post it" when that woman has NEVER given any indication in her past as being someone who enjoys the company of lots of different men in quick succession (especially when drink is involved), has boasted of her sexual conquests and has stated she refers unprotected sex and has been desperate to get pregnant for a long time and never given justification for someone posting something like that?
It's KP's fault for adding fuel to the fire Betty.
Oh yeah. So uncomfortable he used it on his show and then used his CANbot mouthpiece to say what he didn't have the balls to say himself.
So she was getting drunk and holding hands with Gavin while dating Keiron? Classy bird.
I can't believe you are sticking to this theory- she was quoted verbatim which puts her in a position to sue and even if she has no time for instigating legal action at the moment you can bet there would have been a few tweets if they had "invented" it. And of course she doesn't "write" her columns- have you seen her appalling grammar and spelling on Twitter? She does what most "celeb columnists" do and speaks to them on the phone.
I'm not bothered about "looking silly" nor am I scraping any barrels ... I'd say those who are so desperate to find evidence this baby isn't her husbands are doing that.
And people having affairs usually do it behind closed doors ... Not in public
*shakes head, leaves thread*
Again I will point out I was being flippant ... We know nothing about Emily because she isn't perusing the limelight .. So we can't and I wouldn't .. Claim to know anything about her habits when socialising..
If she moved rapidly on from Gavin to Keiron she was not having an affair. If she was seeing Keiron while getting drunk with Gavin and holding hands with him then it wasn't behind closed doors.
He was uncomfortable. I agree that using mouthpieces as they did in footage was manipulative. He needs to step up and say "NO" and stop making himself look a fool.
Of course they are quoting her verbatim - the key word there is "ghost writer" - they write as her. She agrees to it - so no legal action needed. The point is if they speak to her quickly, as you say, when a whole page (or even more) story has to be written obviously some parts are going to be more factual than others.
I've seen the clip already..but thank ou for posting it .. I don't see any proof this was the first time he knew of her pregnancy..and I still believe this clip shouldn't of been put into the show
I think the due date of the baby is pretty crucial - don't you? And most of the story consisted of direct quotes.
No. KP did that by being seen with several men (in circumstances that are nothing to do with "going out with my long term male friends for a nice evening meal" scenario) at what could be now the possible date of conception.
And what I find disgusting is her being seen with another man out on the piss when she was meant to be seeing Kev. Or maybe I'm just old fashioned.
Well article below she says they were dating 2 months before they got married in Jan so I would assume she WAS dating Kev when she was out with old Gavy boy. (but her idea of dating may be different from mine)
http://www.nowmagazine.co.uk/celebrity-news/545269/katie-price-i-m-glad-i-started-dating-kieran-hayler-online-if-we-d-met-in-a-bar-i-d-have-been-drunk-nightmare-kate
So a woman can't be seen in the company of another man when she is dating someone else without people assuming they are sleeping with that man..a. Man she had been working with that day a man she sat with drinking whilst that mans friend was also there for half the time they were together ... In a restaurant I might add.then went home separately
I honestly thought those days were over and women were allowed to have male mates ...
WOW - it's amazing how savvy you are when it concerns Peter Andre but when it's the Queen of Trash you're resorting to the 'where's the evidence' line.
We here can only form an opinion based on what she has said in the past.
Yes no one here has any proof that she shagged all these men around the time she got knocked up but because of her past comments which other posters here have pointed out, it creates speculation and there's no smoke without fire after all.
As for this Emily - as others have said, there has been NO reason to speculate even whose child she is carrying whereas with the Pricey there was a doubt - that's why the speculation, threads, gossip etc.
IMO any male z list celeb she has been spotted with definitely gets a shag from her on the first date no doubt.