Littlejohn on the Leveson Inquiry - "discredited, disreputable creep" Johann Harri
Guardianista
Posts: 995 Forum Member
✭✭
In an interesting article in today's Mail Richard mentions the pathetic Dirty Harri for the first time since he was shamed following his exposure as a plagiarist and sad little vindictive troll:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2085868/Leveson-inquiry-Good-evening-Im-Ethics--case-tell.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2085868/Leveson-inquiry-Good-evening-Im-Ethics--case-tell.html
0
Comments
You missed out "pornographer" - with an unhealthy interest in incest!
Mmmm. Tell me more.
I knew about a long article he wrote entitled
Remember: Paedophiles Are People Too.
(I gave him an extra "r" in Hari by mistake)
I think the Hari reference has been removed.
He doesn't mention him by name. That's why I popped in to make it perfectly clear who he was on about. It's the top rated comment. I'm not just the top rated poster on here you know.
Anyway, enough of me, this is the bit:
The editor of The Independent gave evidence this week, yet he is about to welcome back to his pages a notorious plagiarist and internet ‘troll’, who invented an imaginary friend — a bit like James Stewart’s rabbit in the movie Harvey — to hack into other journalists’ web profiles and insert lies, smears and criminal libels.
The Independent’s editor explains his decision to rehabilitate this discredited, disreputable creep on the grounds that he will only be a columnist, not an interviewer.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2085868/Leveson-inquiry-Good-evening-Im-Ethics--case-tell.html#ixzz1jLIqaq8M
Sorry, got to his lies about the HRA and switched off a bit.
Was this your comment?:
"maybe littlejohn does't like Johann Hari because he wiped the floor with him in a televised debate ....see utube"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1390395.stm
LITTLEJOHN: But you haven't read the book in its totality and you have to read the book in its totality.
SELF: Why?
LITTLEJOHN: In order to understand it.
SELF: Does it turn into Tolstoy at page 205?
LITTLEJOHN: No it doesn't turn into Tolstoy. I don't set out to be Tolstoy. It is a much more complex book than that.
SELF:Than Tolstoy?
LITTLEJOHN: Nah.
[laughter]
SELF: Well he doesn't say he's a human being, does he? He uses the classic form of demonisation which is to say he's a chimp, in other words he's bestial. So he's actually dehumanised the subject of his abuse before he even moves on to piling on the pejoratives, and I think that's very psychologically interesting, of course we're all familiar with the kind of people who demonise other human beings by turning them into bestiary...we all know who does that.
[long pause]
LITTLEJOHN: In the Psychiatrist's Chair with Nicky Campbell
CAMPBELL: Caroline Feraday has the travel.
Of course not - I said mine was the top rated comment.
But I have responded to that trolling one. It didn't get put up but I've tried again.
This is the top rated one - it's about quality not quantitiy, chuck:
Richard finally mentions the "discredited, disreputable creep" Johann Hari, eh. No doubt more of the Left-wing trolls will be out in force today.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2085868/Leveson-inquiry-Good-evening-Im-Ethics--case-tell.html#ixzz1jLe9eq27
I'm afraid I haven't actively sought out the 'fiction' that Hari authored (via his David Rose pseudenym) as it's not exactly my cup of tea!
All I know is that his worrying fantasies centered on homosexuality and incest. Naturally the 'incest' part of that combo is by far the more alarming (and illegal) of the two.
I think that if I were to even speculate as to the specifics of his depraved sexual fantasies the Mods would quickly intervene so I won't.
Interestingly, even though the hapless Johan/David Rose have both been proven to be liars, cowards, cheats as well as a pair of depraved dirty boys, The Indy continues to employ them both. I think that says quite a lot about that particular newspaper really...
But Littlejohn never had any credibility to begin with.
I'd say the fact that you find homosexuality "alarming" "depraved" and "dirty" says quite a bit about YOU.
Pointing out a past meeting of the two is highly relevant and something an honest columnist would have mentioned, it's certainly not "trolling".
Just to explain to our less well informed members; Littlejohn is a newspaper GREAT as evidenced by his induction in to the inaugural Press Hall of Fame.
And that goes someway to explaining why he is the highest paid newspaper columnist by a long way and the two most successful national newspapers have been fighting over his services for decades.
Ah, you're getting popularity (with the sort of morons who believe what they read in the papers) and credibility mixed up:
http://fullfact.org/factchecks/biscuit_ban_health_and_safety_office-3084
Littlejohn is nothing more than third rate, ranting tabloid scribbler of the worst kind. There's only one reason why he's having a go at Johann Hari and that because Littlejohn was shown up for the populist fool that he is for all to see:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtwYfcw441I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxmlaur5UsA
Sorry to have to correct you again pal, but he's a regular troller from the far-Left totalitarian Mailwatch site.
Ah, G-man, you never stop bringing the funny. Don't ever change.
It is, comrade. It's like a weird totalitarian cult over there. Are YOU a Mailwatch member per chance? :rolleyes:
By the way,I see the Mail have posted my comments to that effect - shame they didn't post another much better one about Littlejohn's suggestion of what Dirty Hari was up to each time he kept disappearing into the toilets before the show stated.
I thought he was like Liz Jones: everyone only reads her to unleash some healthy rage against her vile wittering.