Pointless deadlocks
mialicious
Posts: 4,686
Forum Member
✭✭✭
I dont understand deadlock??..if one judge refuses to vote then they should just count the votes they already have without having to go to the phone votes, which means 2-1 to rough copy.
what a fix.
what a fix.
0
Comments
if she is not going to vote then what is the point in the judges why not just go straight to the phone vote.
it means the people who vote get the acts THEY choose
not the judges.
I might not like who gets to the final but thats the people
who bother to vote..
Laserline
Sharon did the right thing and the act with the least votes went home.
Exactly. If Sharon hadn't done that we'd doubtless have the tone-deaf RC in the final. A perfect result IMHO.
no one, Louis & Nicole voted Luke to the final Gary obvs voted to send Rough Copy , Sharon sent it deadlock so she would of voted Rough Copy
If Sharon didn't want to vote she would have abstained. She looked stressed because she had the decisive vote.
That is what happens if one judge refuses to vote!
But that's not Deadlock, which is two votes each.
Sharon did vote. She voted for Luke, it just wasn't very clear amongst all the commotion.
Sharon did make it quite clear that she was sending it to deadlock which in essence meant she was saving Luke.
But then there would have been no point in the sing off, because the result would already be determined, and the contestants would not be able to change it no matter how well they performed!
but 90% of the time thats how it is anyway. there votes are pointless. because the last 'judge' bottles it and goes to the phone vote.