Agreed - not the fault of the actress, more that she's now become a real trainwreck of a character.
I think it happening to Kat and Jane would have been a good storyline. I feel involving Ronnie has made a lot of people go :rolleyes:
They couldn't of picked someone better then Ronnie to do the storyline, Jane has kids (sort of) Ronnie hasn't, we all know she has been desprate for a baby for ages, even messing with Jack's comdoms, I can see why they picked Ronnie.
They couldn't of picked someone better then Ronnie to do the storyline, Jane has kids (sort of) Ronnie hasn't, we all know she has been desprate for a baby for ages, even messing with Jack's comdoms, I can see why they picked Ronnie.
But they took two of her children from her already!
Jane is desperate for her and Ian to have a child of their own (or even any child, see Lucy's miscarriage/abortion): and he keeps denying her at every chance. I could see her going a bit mad with opportunity of a baby then having it taking away - though I've now just remembered Ian's had the snip. Nevermind :)
She's the best Eastenders have and has been since she arrived, although she started getting outstanding around May 2008 when she found out Roxy was pregnant. She's just got better and better
She's a good actress but this is far too over the top imo.
Lacey (bi-polar story line especially) and Gillian Wright have both been excellent (better than Sam)
There are plenty others just as good if not better. She's still good though.
Really?! On Eastenders? Right now??? Stacey was the only other female on the same level as Sam but now she's gone...it's only really Max i can think of that can hold a candle to her
I thought it was a nice touch for the character. She'd always been portrayed as someone who was always independent and even quite cold at times - I guess having Archie as a father did that. But with that line she showed she just desperately wanted someone to reassure her and tell her everything was alright in a childlike manner which I don't think we've ever seen before from her.
Comments
They couldn't of picked someone better then Ronnie to do the storyline, Jane has kids (sort of) Ronnie hasn't, we all know she has been desprate for a baby for ages, even messing with Jack's comdoms, I can see why they picked Ronnie.
That one wasn't.
I thought Sam's acting was quite good. I'm not usually a huge fan of hers, but she was quite moving tonight, IMO
Tanya has no place in the square now, even Jane noticed!
I actually laughed at that!
THAT was scary!! Really spine chilling. Excellent performance from Sam Womack tonight... we all felt for poor Ronnie
But they took two of her children from her already!
Jane is desperate for her and Ian to have a child of their own (or even any child, see Lucy's miscarriage/abortion): and he keeps denying her at every chance. I could see her going a bit mad with opportunity of a baby then having it taking away - though I've now just remembered Ian's had the snip. Nevermind
Do you want to spoiler tag that? You can't go revealing future storylines like that :rolleyes::p:D:D
The fact that is Ronnie didn't really shock me at all, you know as soon as Ronnie gets a bit of hapiness, there's heartache to follow.
She's a good actress but this is far too over the top imo.
Lacey (bi-polar story line especially) and Gillian Wright have both been excellent (better than Sam)
Really?! On Eastenders? Right now??? Stacey was the only other female on the same level as Sam but now she's gone...it's only really Max i can think of that can hold a candle to her
Since Ian was seen at the Vic, I imagine shagging Phil unless she has someone else on the go.