It goes without saying that the best sex is what naturally turns you on. It's not something you can rationalise. Obviously vaginas don't do anything for me, but that's how I'm made.
I don't really hold to the notion that gay sex is better because a guy knows what a guy likes. Every guy is different, and is turned on by different things. Nipples do absolutely nothing for me, for example, but many guys I've slept with were mad about theirs and mine. I'd feign interest just to oblige. I don't like mine being "dealt with" in any way.
Jonathan Meades exploded the myth many years ago in his book of essays. He is right about everything in the world, and so thus it must be.
What's absurd to me is the fact a good man is not willing to have a nice big cock up his arse. Listen, I understand it takes a bit of open-mindedness to welcome these things but it's actually frickin' good (okay if you're a straight man, a finger at least). When done right it's a very different orgasm you're getting from plain old masturbation or sex. It's better and more intense and flows more through the body rather than bog-standard.
Open your mind (and your holes) and get slating once you've tried it. Until then, get outta my pub.
Here we go again.
I've posted on this subject before, it would appear that this girl on girl stuff is the Holy Grail to heterosexual males, if we are to believe popular mythology.
Maybe I missed a meeting, for as a a rabid skirt chaser when I was young, and "in the life", who would walk barefoot on broken glass if there was half a chance of getting a crack at a nubile female, girl on girl did absolutely nada for me, still doesn't.
There are nights when I cry myself to sleep, wondering what went wrong with me, please God, surely I'm not a sexual deviant just because two girls kissing leaves me cold.
Here we go again.
I've posted on this subject before, it would appear that this girl on girl stuff is the Holy Grail to heterosexual males, if we are to believe popular mythology.
Maybe I missed a meeting, for as a a rabid skirt chaser when I was young, and "in the life", who would walk barefoot on broken glass if there was half a chance of getting a crack at a nubile female, girl on girl did absolutely nada for me, still doesn't.
There are nights when I cry myself to sleep, wondering what went wrong with me, please God, surely I'm not a sexual deviant just because two girls kissing leaves me cold.
Can someone explain to me, how when you do if backside you don't get a load of mesh over yourself, I have often wondered about this and would never do it for that reason. I am straight but obviously I doubt this matters in the mess over yourself respect.
What's absurd to me is the fact a good man is not willing to have a nice big cock up his arse. Listen, I understand it takes a bit of open-mindedness to welcome these things but it's actually frickin' good (okay if you're a straight man, a finger at least). When done right it's a very different orgasm you're getting from plain old masturbation or sex. It's better and more intense and flows more through the body rather than bog-standard.
Open your mind (and your holes) and get slating once you've tried it. Until then, get outta my pub.
As a heterosexual straight as an arrow male, the thought of getting anywhere near another blokes arse makes me feel sick, and most red blooded males would feel the same.
I don't see how gay sex would be pleasurable for the giver, its surely just a big open space, whereas a vagina would sort of massage the penis!
Well there's only one way to find that out!
But considering an anus is much tighter and less loose than a vagina (which is also designed for babies come out of) it has the ability to "massage the penis" remarkably well. Speaking from experience of course.
Oh and then there's something called an "Anal Orgasm" - which is achieved y massaging of the male prostate gland. If you've ever been lucky enough to experience one, it's incredible.
Yes people are rather clueless, I guess it's another world those hetties live in, must get boring!
I supppose only bisexual people are really qualified to answer this but I have had some experience of both and I am inclined to say that gay sex is better. Gay sex is so much more reciprocal and to my mind what sex should be about, whereas straight sex seems to be about the woman lying back, opening her legs, and the guy doing all the work, which is all a bit boring I think.
Daft question...
Just being in love - and having an attentive lover - can make all the difference between OK sex and good sex.
As a heterosexual straight as an arrow male, the thought of getting anywhere near another blokes arse makes me feel sick, and most red blooded males would feel the same.
Must say you sound a bit insecure in your sexuality!
As a heterosexual straight as an arrow male, the thought of getting anywhere near another blokes arse makes me feel sick, and most red blooded males would feel the same.
Comments
Is that like macrame ?
I know you gays like home crafts.
if it makes you happy and your not hurting anybody else ,,,,,,,, then carry on
It goes without saying that the best sex is what naturally turns you on. It's not something you can rationalise. Obviously vaginas don't do anything for me, but that's how I'm made.
I don't really hold to the notion that gay sex is better because a guy knows what a guy likes. Every guy is different, and is turned on by different things. Nipples do absolutely nothing for me, for example, but many guys I've slept with were mad about theirs and mine. I'd feign interest just to oblige. I don't like mine being "dealt with" in any way.
Jonathan Meades exploded the myth many years ago in his book of essays. He is right about everything in the world, and so thus it must be.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Peter-Knows-Likes-Paladin-Books/dp/0586088903
Open your mind (and your holes) and get slating once you've tried it. Until then, get outta my pub.
You don't sound the most adventurous of sex partners!
Here we go again.
I've posted on this subject before, it would appear that this girl on girl stuff is the Holy Grail to heterosexual males, if we are to believe popular mythology.
Maybe I missed a meeting, for as a a rabid skirt chaser when I was young, and "in the life", who would walk barefoot on broken glass if there was half a chance of getting a crack at a nubile female, girl on girl did absolutely nada for me, still doesn't.
There are nights when I cry myself to sleep, wondering what went wrong with me, please God, surely I'm not a sexual deviant just because two girls kissing leaves me cold.
Probably quite hard to fit anything else in your back passage anyway alongside the pole that's firmly planted in there.
Haha brilliant
But watching lesbos getting it on is also fun. :eek:
Not always for the woman. Many (most even) can't come from penetrative sex.
It is if the male doesn't know what he's doing.
Not in the slightest.
I'm not picky
Care to elaborate, I'm struggling to understand what isn't in the slightest ?
Neither however can compare to masturbation! (which defies sexuality)
As a heterosexual straight as an arrow male, the thought of getting anywhere near another blokes arse makes me feel sick, and most red blooded males would feel the same.
Well there's only one way to find that out!
But considering an anus is much tighter and less loose than a vagina (which is also designed for babies come out of) it has the ability to "massage the penis" remarkably well. Speaking from experience of course.
Oh and then there's something called an "Anal Orgasm" - which is achieved y massaging of the male prostate gland. If you've ever been lucky enough to experience one, it's incredible.
Yes people are rather clueless, I guess it's another world those hetties live in, must get boring!
Daft question...
Just being in love - and having an attentive lover - can make all the difference between OK sex and good sex.
Where you stick your willy isn't everything..
Must say you sound a bit insecure in your sexuality!
How little you know!
Alright calm down