Options
9200T - wouldn't it be good if....
![[Deleted User]](https://wc.vanillicon.com/v2/c75e21c6a426d47a9f1d0e6daf5a1384.svg)
[Deleted User]
Posts: 298 Forum Member
✭
Okay, I'm gonna start a "wouldn't it be good" thread 
Here goes a few for a start:
....if the Fast Forward/Rewind buttons on the remote made the EPG go forward/back 2 hours WITHOUT having to bring up the Time Bar. Also, why not let the 'record' button set a reservation while using the time bar.
....if one press of OK in the EPG sets a 'Reminder' (a popup that tells you a program is about to start) and clicking OK switches the unit to that channel, two presses will show a reminder but automatically change to the channel, and three presses sets a reservation/recording.
....if the i-Plate let you surf all of the program information in the EPG for all of the channels.
Here goes a few for a start:
....if the Fast Forward/Rewind buttons on the remote made the EPG go forward/back 2 hours WITHOUT having to bring up the Time Bar. Also, why not let the 'record' button set a reservation while using the time bar.
....if one press of OK in the EPG sets a 'Reminder' (a popup that tells you a program is about to start) and clicking OK switches the unit to that channel, two presses will show a reminder but automatically change to the channel, and three presses sets a reservation/recording.
....if the i-Plate let you surf all of the program information in the EPG for all of the channels.
0
Comments
....if the EPG used the "List" button to give a vertical list all of the programs on a selected channel, with time on the left and program name on the right (at the moment the 'List' button isn't used in the guide).
With respect isn't this thread covering the same ground as the Software Ideas thread?
http://forum.digitalspy.co.uk/board/showthread.php?t=296852
Colin
Yeah, I saw that afterwards, but I don't know why you guys are so hung up on keeping things in one thread.....other forums aren't like that.
Wouldn't it be good if... The commercial skip and instant rewind features were on the main part of the remote. The blue and yellow buttons, maybe.
I think the majority of regulars in the old Humax threads agree with you and prefer the muti-thread approach we now have, so I guess that is why it has been changed. I see their point of view but I have to say that on balance I prefer the old way. I find it easier to follow just one thread for each model of PVR even though for a popular topic it can lead to a long thread.
Colin
Whatever you like that's fine by me
However, with our new found freedom to create threads we must be careful not to go too far the other way - having multiple threads on the front page for the same topic is silly and wastes people's time IMO.
One thread for each topic is the ideal, although duplicates will obviously turn up from time to time when old threads have dropped off the front page. This is basically unavoidable (until newbies learn to use the search function :rolleyes: ), but tolerable.
I won't start my own thread in future. I'll just hijack another one and go off-topic....just like you have this one :mad: (in my opinion worse than starting the same topic twice, is hijacking a thread to argue about crap that only trolls care about about).
Are you 'one-thread-for-all' types happy now?
Sorry to continue this conversation, as you seem to be getting offended now which wasn't my intention at all
However, I think you're still missing my point, which was that if you'd used the other thread your comments wouldn't have been offtopic.
Anyway, IMO it's much better to have one thread for a topic which may wander slightly off course as it evolves, as opposed to multiple threads talking about exactly the same thing.
Off topic conversation was much more of a problem in the old mega-thread, because it disrupted all the concurrent conversations, and the thread was pretty hard to follow at the best of times.
It's obviously down to personal preferences. OT Police also patrol separate threads. You could say I was acting in that role when I responded in my post #5 above
I'm still undecided which PVR I'm going to buy so I'm following the threads on most of the manufacturers products. So now I have about 20 active threads to follow instead of about 5 which means more time taken visiting UserCP to select the threads. This is exaserbated by DS often crashing my browser so I lose the "read messages" update and have to go through all the threads again.
I do appreciate there are advantages in the separate thread approach so I'm happy to accept the majority view.
Colin
As I said, this is a general Humax forum. If the other thread was labelled PVR-9200T (as is mine) then I probably would have posted there instead. For all I knew it could have a thread for the 8000T.
Anyway, I'm bored with this now. Let's not reply to this thread now so it drops down the list. Keep the others on top. I'll post my software suggestions in the other thread.