Steph nude in the Sun

2»

Comments

  • matt.bmatt.b Posts: 8,815
    Forum Member
    Originally posted by scottee
    Steph should have nothing to be ashamed of. She has a fantastic figure; and I can see why she's happy with her handfuls.

    :)

    cute eh pity about the cleaner character :(
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 795
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I'm sure Steph's breasts look fake. They seem too round and high up to be natural breasts.
  • lulululu Posts: 4,685
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Originally posted by bigmadmental
    I'm sure Steph's breasts look fake. They seem too round and high up to be natural breasts.

    nah, she's arching her back and has her arms back....I can make my boobs look like that too if I stand like that :D

    lu *sorry no pics*
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 795
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Originally posted by lulu
    nah, she's arching her back and has her arms back....I can make my boobs look like that too if I stand like that :D

    lu *sorry no pics*

    I better start doing that then, my man boobs are starting to sag ;-)
  • lulululu Posts: 4,685
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Originally posted by bigmadmental
    I better start doing that then, my man boobs are starting to sag ;-)

    Once they start looking like Gos' then I would worry :D
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 795
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Originally posted by lulu
    Once they start looking like Gos' then I would worry :D

    But he does have a fine rack.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 74
    Forum Member
    How NOT to sell a DVD. :)
  • sickboy1888sickboy1888 Posts: 1,664
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I always thought steph and cameron would have made a nice couple
  • ElectraElectra Posts: 55,660
    Forum Member
    I always thought steph and cameron would have made a nice couple

    Pointless bump of a five year old thread. Why?
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 68,508
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    :D It got me confused for AGES. Couldn't find the Steph picture but couldn't THINK who Cameron could be. Does David Cameron have an opinion about BB9 Steph, I wondered? Cameron Diaz?
  • coopermanyorkscoopermanyorks Posts: 21,215
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Awww , now I can see clearly why there is no Steph pictures
  • Tom8592Tom8592 Posts: 2,479
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Bastard ;)

    You got me all excited thinking it was BB9 Steph :(:(
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,130
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Well, this thread might be locked soon anyway. The other one he bumped was.
  • brushyourteethbrushyourteeth Posts: 712
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I've just spend about 10 minutes frantically searching through the suns website looking for these pics. and it turns out its from 5 years ago!

    Absolutely appalling behaviour. The bumper should be banned for life. and shot.

    I've gotta go and clean up 10 minutes worth of drool now.
  • Tom8592Tom8592 Posts: 2,479
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I've just spend about 10 minutes frantically searching through the suns website looking for these pics. and it turns out its from 5 years ago!

    Absolutely appalling behaviour. The bumper should be banned for life. and shot.

    I've gotta go and clean up 10 minutes worth of drool now.

    :D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
  • ElectraElectra Posts: 55,660
    Forum Member
    Lurker wrote: »
    Well, this thread might be locked soon anyway. The other one he bumped was.

    It appears the mods are happy for ancient threads to get bumped. None of them have been locked apart from the Kate one. I guess that means we're all free to dig up anything of interest then irrespective of the thread's age.

    Actually I've just noticed the ones that got bumped today seem to have gone. I wonder why this one remains unmolested. :confused:
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,130
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Electra wrote: »
    It appears the mods are happy for ancient threads to get bumped. None of them have been locked apart from the Kate one. I guess that means we're all free to dig up anything of interest then irrespective of the thread's age.
    I wouldn't like to try my luck though. :o
    Electra wrote: »
    Actually I've just noticed the ones that got bumped today seem to have gone. I wonder why this one remains unmolested. :confused:
    Probably just an oversight. :)
  • ElectraElectra Posts: 55,660
    Forum Member
    Lurker wrote: »
    I wouldn't like to try my luck though. :o

    Quite sure you don't fancy another Fight Night discussion? :D

    How about Craig tackling Nick? :D
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,130
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Electra wrote: »
    Quite sure you don't fancy another Fight Night discussion? :D

    How about Craig tackling Nick? :D

    Are you suggesting we flood the front page of the forum with long-forgotten threads from yesteryear?
  • ElectraElectra Posts: 55,660
    Forum Member
    Lurker wrote: »
    Are you suggesting we fill the front page of the forum with long-forgotten threads from yesteryear?

    Not really. This thread is bugging me though :o
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,130
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Electra wrote: »
    Not really. This thread is bugging me though :o

    Good, because I'd want no part of that. ;)

    I'm sure this thread will have been moved along quietly by morning's light.

    However, I also suspect sickboy might have some more blasts from the past for us tomorrow. :rolleyes:
  • ElectraElectra Posts: 55,660
    Forum Member
    Lurker wrote: »
    Good, because I'd want no part of that. ;)

    I'm sure this thread will have been moved along quietly by morning's light.

    However, I also suspect sickboy might have some more blasts from the past for us tomorrow. :rolleyes:

    It's a shame if all they're doing is removing them when that happens though. It means that archive is gone forever.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,130
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Electra wrote: »
    It's a shame if all they're doing is removing them when that happens though. It means that archive is gone forever.

    That's true. Maybe they've just taken them away for maintenance, who knows? (Edit: That's probably unlikely, isn't it?:o) Strange that they would lock the Kate one but remove the others.

    Though I didn't see anything about it in the rules, I expect repeatedly bumping old threads is a punishable offence.
  • ElectraElectra Posts: 55,660
    Forum Member
    Lurker wrote: »
    Good, because I'd want no part of that. ;)

    I'm sure this thread will have been moved along quietly by morning's light.

    Nope. It's still here :p
This discussion has been closed.