The Anti 3D television thread

linkinpark875linkinpark875 Posts: 29,702
Forum Member
✭✭✭
Just wondered if there's anybody else who is very anti 3D. I for one will never adopt the awful technology hate it in the cinema as it is. Sky is wasting alot of money on event tv that few want.

How about invest more in HD and Super HD for the bigger TV's and VOD.

I'll buy a 3D ready TV when I update but fully hope it becomes an obsolete button feature like the now defunct text services and video plus which have now all gone digital.

Sky are pushing this like it's better than 3D. My reckoning is the picture is actually a lower resolution than standard 3D is it not? Plus you need silly glasses. So today Sky launch there 3D channel how about a massive anti 3D discussion? I am a Sky customer and don't want it so Sky should listen!

3D failed once let it fail again! :p
«134

Comments

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 823
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I tried it by watching football in a pub. It made me feel nausious and quite giddy, this was an effect of the 3D, not the beer, I assure you. A lot of others were experiencing the same.

    Sky shouldn't bother with it's online list of 3D pubs, you can easily tell which ones have 3D. They're the ones with piles of fresh vomit outside them on a Sunday afternoon! :D
  • linkinpark875linkinpark875 Posts: 29,702
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    MostynDS wrote: »
    I tried it by watching football in a pub. It made me feel nausious and quite giddy, this was an effect of the 3D, not the beer, I assure you. A lot of others were experiencing the same.

    Sky shouldn't bother with it's online list of 3D pubs, you can easily tell which ones have 3D. They're the ones with piles of fresh vomit outside them on a Sunday afternoon! :D

    Yes. Sky Movies may have been showing 'The Hangover' this week I bet there 3D coverage guarantees just that! :D
  • fmradiotuner1fmradiotuner1 Posts: 20,499
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Not one bit interested in 3D.
    I only bought a new 50 inch LG TV the other week but this is also not 3D.
    So won't be getting it any time soon.
  • ShaunIOWShaunIOW Posts: 11,326
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    The only plus side to 3D TV for me is the fact big screen non-3D sets have dropped in price - I'm blind in one eye so have no need or desire for 3D anyway.
  • linkinpark875linkinpark875 Posts: 29,702
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    ShaunIOW wrote: »
    The only plus side to 3D TV for me is the fact big screen non-3D sets have dropped in price - I'm blind in one eye so have no need or desire for 3D anyway.

    For how long though? Once they get 3D's down to £400 you can get standard 3D ones will be in the back corners of Supermarkets while the big stores charge high prices and try and force you to think you need 3D.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,979
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Ah so thats why all those sets in Currys Wrexham are so blurred.
  • linkinpark875linkinpark875 Posts: 29,702
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    janet owen wrote: »
    Ah so thats why all those sets in Currys Wrexham are so blurred.

    Yes take of the rose tinted spectacles and 3D is all a Blur! :eek:

    Welcome to Blurry Vision.
  • Mark.Mark. Posts: 84,922
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    What a daft thread.

    No-one is forcing you to buy a 3D TV set, nor are you being dragged kicking and screaming to a pub.

    It's another classic "I don't like something so it should be scrapped" thread.
  • lozloz Posts: 4,720
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Sky are pushing this like it's better than 3D. My reckoning is the picture is actually a lower resolution than standard 3D is it not?

    that sentence makes no sense :confused:
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 4,624
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    loz wrote: »
    that sentence makes no sense :confused:

    He meant lower than HD which is correct.

    Ill never buy a 3dTV, its a fad and a huge waste of money.
  • lozloz Posts: 4,720
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Flyer 10 wrote: »
    He meant lower than HD which is correct.

    Perhaps he meant that. I don't know.

    Whilst the current Sky 3D broadcasts are not full HD, Bluray 3D is full HD, and future broadcasts will probably provide full HD too once they agree the standards.

    (though current 3DTVs using polarized technology like the LG sets will only ever be half resolution because that is a physical limitation)
  • realwalesrealwales Posts: 3,110
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I watched a 3D match in a pub and thought it was rubbish. It left me feeling slightly sick and I just didn't think it was in any way, shape or form an improvement on what I had before. They also put the price of the beer up for the occasion.
    I will not be paying extra for it now or ever. I'm much happier watching the Ryder Cup on standard definition on my CRT TV. It's as good as anything if you ask me.
  • Mark.Mark. Posts: 84,922
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Seemingly, the golf is very good in 3D because you're able to see all the contours on the greens.

    I think that's a sport more suited to 3D, because there's very little camera movement in golf, unlike pitch-based sports such as football and rugby. For these, I think we need to wait for SuperHD-3D, which would basically allow a single static cameras to be placed around the ground and used as though you were sitting where they're sited, i.e. exactly like being at the game, albeit with the ability to jump from one side of the ground to the other.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 840
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    How can you be so against something that:
    A) you are not being forced to buy,
    B) you aren't being penalised for not subscribing to, and
    C) other people will enjoy and would be willing to pay for.

    If anything, 2D TV's will become cheaper, and if they disappear from stores in 10 years, you'll still be able to buy them online or in Argos or somewhere. Or even better, 3D TV's will be the same price as comparable 2D TV's now, and then you can simply watch in 2D.

    I'm not going to buy a 3D TV any time soon, but that doesn't mean I want it to fail.
  • thecolonelthecolonel Posts: 255
    Forum Member
    I'll buy a 3D ready TV when I update but fully hope it becomes an obsolete button feature like the now defunct text services and video plus which have now all gone digital".


    your anti 3d but yet say you will buy one when you update :confused:
  • lozloz Posts: 4,720
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    realwales wrote: »
    standard definition on my CRT TV. It's as good as anything if you ask me.

    I bet you hanker for the return of 405 line B&W... :rolleyes:
  • cnbcwatchercnbcwatcher Posts: 56,681
    Forum Member
    I'm not too keen on 3D TV at the moment, I saw a demonstration in Currys a while back and thought it was overrated really. besides those glasses are rather uncomfortable and I'd look daft wearing them in the living room :p
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 168
    Forum Member
    Think its a fad thought up by the marketing guys

    'We have managed to get everyone to throw out their old CRT TVs and purchased LCD/Plasma, now what can we sell to get them to upgrade again'
  • ShaunWShaunW Posts: 2,356
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I bet a piano player in a old flea pit would have started a similar thread about 'talkies' if he had the internet at the time.

    :D
  • burnesideburneside Posts: 2,951
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    realwales wrote: »
    standard definition on my CRT TV. It's as good as anything if you ask me.

    Agreed. When my sister comes to visit she always remarks how much clearer my (CRT) picture is compared to their Sony flatscreen.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,095
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Just wondered if there's anybody else who is very anti 3D. I for one will never adopt the awful technology hate it in the cinema as it is. Sky is wasting alot of money on event tv that few want.

    How about invest more in HD and Super HD for the bigger TV's and VOD.

    I'll buy a 3D ready TV when I update but fully hope it becomes an obsolete button feature like the now defunct text services and video plus which have now all gone digital.

    Sky are pushing this like it's better than 3D. My reckoning is the picture is actually a lower resolution than standard 3D is it not? Plus you need silly glasses. So today Sky launch there 3D channel how about a massive anti 3D discussion? I am a Sky customer and don't want it so Sky should listen!

    3D failed once let it fail again! :p

    Its not a matter of anti 3d or anti BBC and so on,the fact is how much money will you have to pay yet again
  • stripedcatstripedcat Posts: 6,689
    Forum Member
    Got to admit I think 3D TV is just a gimmick. I hope we don't see a BBC 3D channel sometime soon!!! That would make the Daily Mail have a fit!!!! I can see it now :"Millions wasted on BBC 3D channel!"
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,044
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    All the 3D craze was started by avatar anyway, sure it was a good watch but nothing to start a new trend over.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,716
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Add me to the Anti-3D brigade.

    I despair that more and more Movie releases are in 3D or have a 3D option.
    To be it's all a bit gimmicky and too intrusive. Plus I also get a bit motion sickness-like with it.

    Anyway fear not, i was reading that with 12% of the population have depth perception problems so 2D should be around for quite a while yet.

    (wonder when the first 3D porn will be released? :D)
  • colin 38colin 38 Posts: 139
    Forum Member
    I will not be upgrading until we get 3D tvs without wearing specs.
    I think it will go the same way as player cam and other gimmicks we had a few years ago.
Sign In or Register to comment.