Home› Movies
Click here to check out Digital Spy's Movies section for the latest news, updates, cast interviews and reviews of your favourite films.
Options

Meet The Parents: Little Fockers

FortyTwo25FortyTwo25 Posts: 5,170
Forum Member
✭
in Movies #1
It's here! :D

http://www.odeon.co.uk/fanatic/film_info/m12347/Little_Fockers/

UK release date: 22/12/2010

One of the children's name's Henry so not in the slightest bit funny. They probably peaked at Pamela Martha Focker.
I won't see it before Christmas in fact I'll probably just wait 'til DVD/Network Premiere :o

ETA: Trailer=No laughs
«1

Comments

  • Options
    LaurawhittzLaurawhittz Posts: 873
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #2
    i cant wait for it to be released! :)
  • Options
    Sinbazro_05Sinbazro_05 Posts: 923
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #3
    The trailer looked awful. :mad:
  • Options
    SiebenburgenSiebenburgen Posts: 3,002
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #4
    I have been a fan of Jessica Alba for 14 years but her choice in movies over the past few years have really started to test my patience! :mad:
  • Options
    SteelEdgeSteelEdge Posts: 6,903
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #5
    Meet The Fockers was the first film I ever walked out of. Absolutely terrible. And I really liked Meet The Parents as well! :(

    Won't be going to see this.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 10,848
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #6
    Thanks for posting, I didn't even realise this was due to be released.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 6,442
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #7
    If anything should have stopped at one film it was this. I found the first one passable if a little predictable. It is a Stiller Comedy - and you know what you are going to get. However the sequel was poor with the same type of jokes and basically same old product with new packaging. And if I dislike anything it is sequels that run off the same old thing over and over - one sequel fine, two is pushing it, if a third appears it will be just wrong.
  • Options
    InkblotInkblot Posts: 26,889
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #8
    The reviews are out and it sounds terrible. Two stars in Time Out, two stars in the Daily Telegraph and one star in the Guardian.

    I'm really disappointed that, by all accounts, everyone concerned phoned in their contribution to this one. But there are plenty of other decent films around so I'll save my money and see something better. If everyone else did the same thing, maybe the producers would get the message and stop making third-rate cash-ins.
  • Options
    treefr0gtreefr0g Posts: 23,659
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #9
    I liked the first 2 but have been worried about this one being a stinker since the title was announced (always thought it was a cheap publicity stunt in the hope that the posters/ adverts would be banned).

    The reviews are much as I suspected they would be.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,486
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #10
    I saw this on Christmas Eve and I really enjoyed and so did everyone else in the cinema (or at least they seemed to).
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 4,895
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #11
    I dont understand how people think it looks bad if they enjoy the first 2. IMO it pretty much looks the same
  • Options
    Lukey37Lukey37 Posts: 5,369
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #12
    It wasn't as funny as the first two but that doesn't really say much. The first two were very much low-brow slapstick type comedies. The 3rd is much of the same.

    If you enjoyed the first two, I'm sure you'll find some fun in the 3rd one.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 3,809
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #13
    Went to see this Boxing Day. I thought it was pretty terrible to be honest.
  • Options
    rfonzorfonzo Posts: 11,772
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #14
    SteelEdge wrote: »
    Meet The Fockers was the first film I ever walked out of. Absolutely terrible. And I really liked Meet The Parents as well! :(

    Won't be going to see this.

    It does look predictable and boring and will want to avoid this.
  • Options
    rfonzorfonzo Posts: 11,772
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #15
    FantasticMrFox wrote: »
    Went to see this Boxing Day. I thought it was pretty terrible to be honest.

    It is just an example of franchise film making and is there to make money.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 3,809
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #16
    rfonzo wrote: »
    It is just an example of franchise film making and is there to make money.

    I have a Cineworld card and my sister really wanted to see it so I went along. The first one was okay but it's been downhill from mediocrity since then. IMO this really was boring, long and lacking in the comedy department.
  • Options
    BelligerentBossBelligerentBoss Posts: 777
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #17
    For god's sake don't waste your time & money going to watch this film, it was absolute shite. Seriously, whilst the first two films were watchable fun, this is strained and predictable. The cast must have been offered an irresistable wedge each to make it, but the result is something to forget. It's not even about the 'little fockers' that much, just the same old lines and (non) humour.

    Utter Crap!
  • Options
    jaimeswjaimesw Posts: 1,608
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #18
    Wasn't that good was it!

    Very poor with very few lol moments.
  • Options
    LadyMinervaLadyMinerva Posts: 755
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #19
    I saw it last night and thought it was good....not amazing, but funny in parts and very watchable.
  • Options
    ScottishWoodyScottishWoody Posts: 23,241
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #20
    Pretty rubbish if you ask me. Meet The Parents is one of my fav films, Meet The Fockers was really funny, but this had a couple of LOL moments and nothing more.

    Why call it Little Fockers if the story line is mostly about Jack and Greg?

    One part that DID make me really laugh though ...
    "Can girls poop from there vagina?"
  • Options
    emailsemails Posts: 11,282
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #21
    FortyTwo25 wrote: »
    It's here! :D

    http://www.odeon.co.uk/fanatic/film_info/m12347/Little_Fockers/

    UK release date: 22/12/2010

    One of the children's name's Henry so not in the slightest bit funny. They probably peaked at Pamela Martha Focker.
    I won't see it before Christmas in fact I'll probably just wait 'til DVD/Network Premiere :o

    ETA: Trailer=No laughs

    what a name to give a family FOCKER missed pronunced as ****ERS
  • Options
    MrIncredibleMrIncredible Posts: 5,034
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #22
    This is truly appalling. I didnt even smile.
  • Options
    ScottishWoodyScottishWoody Posts: 23,241
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #23
    emails wrote: »
    what a name to give a family FOCKER missed pronunced as ****ERS
    Yeah, that was, er, kinda the point of the joke.
  • Options
    emailsemails Posts: 11,282
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #24
    ScottishWoody wrote: »
    Yeah, that was, er, kinda the point of the joke.

    what the film makers joke?
  • Options
    OneTreeHillFanOneTreeHillFan Posts: 7,725
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #25
    I saw this a couple of weeks ago. Really wasn't impressed. Didn't see why it was called Little Fockers either, it was hardly about the kids (thank god)
  • Options
    hypervisorhypervisor Posts: 959
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #26
    boring film
Sign In or Register to comment.