I have naked photo's of both my wife and my friend with benefits and have both shaven and unshaven ones of both and all are exciting to me. However, only the three of us have seen the pics and the whole world will never see them. Not having bush doesn't make any woman less dignified.
You have a wife and woman you are allowed to have sex with?!?
Again, I never said not have a bush isn’t dignified. What I said was that I would have thought that most women posing fully naked for the world to see would prefer to have a bush so that their actual vagina bits aren’t on display. Its almost like you’re covering your bits with something, which would spare you some blushes. That’s why some actress choose to wear a merkin when doing a fully nude scene.
But I guess its something only women can answer – so girls, if you had to pose fully nude, would you support a bush or not?
I don't know if it's 'big' news, I've only seen the thread on here and it popped up on the side of my facebook feed today. Hasn't everyone already seen what she has anyway? I mean porn is available at the click of a mouse, I don't get why it's news-worthy that a woman poses in the nude. I do agree with a previous poster though with the 'where do you go from here?' comment. The celebs who seem to be willing to do just about anything to get attention headlines, I suppose nothing is off-limits for them, maybe she's happy that people are talking about her, positive or negative, for some it's all the same.
Of course she can get her kit off and get paid for it whenever she feels like it, but people are equally entitled to make a comment. Freedom of expression works both ways, and labeling a criticism as being down to 'jealousy' is a bit lazy. Appealing to the male libido is pretty easy, I think some see it as not much of a talent. Of course she has a figure that many straight males find attractive (big bum, big boobs), but that's not really a talent. Even if she hadn't had any surgery done, it's still not an achievement. I guess that's what gets talked about the most is why is she so famous for accomplishing so little? I really don't know, I had only heard of her when she got with Kanye, never heard of a sex tape before that, although I was aware of who her father was. Is it 'admirable' that she's made so much money for not doing much? For some I guess. We live in a world where the media is obsessed by celebs, it's a cycle that perpetuates itself. It's not really a part of my world, I don't watch reality shows or buy tabloid magazines, but it's also hard NOT to be aware of this sort of thing. I'm sure her fame will fade soon enough, the world that is celebrity is fickle.
I'm not sorry to break this to you but the 'teenage girl porn look' is not what all women want either regardless of being told it looks dirty and it's unhygienic (which it is neither).
Did I say, imply or insinuate it was, oh condescending one? And it has nothing to do with 'teenage girl porn', so take the stick out of your arse. If you enjoy receiving oral sex from your partner it's called common courtesy and its a two way street. If your partner likes pulling hairs from their teeth, more power to them.
Why exactly would she make a good porn star? Is it because she has a sex tape? Making a tape with a partner means that you would happily have sex on camera with strangers for money? Is it because she posed naked? I'm curious.
It was a joke, she's known for doing absolutely nothing that could be considered a work. She's not shy presenting various body parts, so why not go into porn. She could just lie on her back and get money for it, somebody else doing all the work. A lot of people would watch that
Kim Kardashian weather you like her or not is one of the most powerful woman on the planet. Mainly for her looks and sex appeal, but credit to her for making the most of what god gave her - people with more talent than her (most athletes, movie stars etc) couldn't dream of living the life she has, met the people she has, partied like she has, made the money she has, visited the countries she has etc for very little hard work.
Her business model has worked a charm. The Apprentice has nothing on her.
I actually think that by having her arse that big, and her boobs big as well, it adds a lot of visual weight to her frame.
Shes always in the mags for being on a diet or feeling fat and frumpy. Maybe if her boobs and bum were a normal size she would appear a lot slimmer.
That being said i would kill to have a bigger bum, not that big but bigger. Maybe i can employ a photoshopper to draw me up some plans
Yes I know what you mean, especially with her being so short too, she has a tendency to look a bit matronly when clothed in anything other than curve clingy Lycra.
Kim Kardashian weather you like her or not is one of the most powerful woman on the planet. Mainly for her looks and sex appeal, but credit to her for making the most of what god gave her - people with more talent than her (most athletes, movie stars etc) couldn't dream of living the life she has, met the people she has, partied like she has, made the money she has, visited the countries she has etc for very little hard work.
Her business model has worked a charm. The Apprentice has nothing on her.
This is the same argument people used to use to defend Madonna back in the day. Someone explain to me why I'm supposed to be in awe of or look up to 'great businessmen/women', I've never quite understood. 'Oh well, she might be a shameless, artless ****, but she's made a lot of money at it.' Yeah. But also she's a shameless artless ****. That's not winning the game of life in my book.
It reminds me of that old joke about the hooker who comes back to her pimp having earned $100 and a nickel. "Who gave you a nickel?" "All of them".
I mean if you're willing to completely debase yourself and stand for nothing you can always make money. Any one of us here could be the personal toilet of a fat German and make a little coin. Let him film it, make even more. Let him invite his friends round, make even more. Doesn't mean you're worthy of respect or admiration does it.
This is the same argument people used to use to defend Madonna back in the day. Someone explain to me why I'm supposed to be in awe of or look up to 'great businessmen/women', I've never quite understood. 'Oh well, she might be a shameless, artless ****, but she's made a lot of money at it.' Yeah. But also she's a shameless artless ****. That's not winning the game of life in my book.
It reminds me of that old joke about the hooker who comes back to her pimp having earned $100 and a nickel. "Who gave you a nickel?" "All of them".
I mean if you're willing to completely debase yourself and stand for nothing you can always make money. Any one of us here could be the personal toilet of a fat German and make a little coin. Let him film it, make even more. Let him invite his friends round, make even more. Doesn't mean you're worthy of respect or admiration does it.
Refusing to give someone respect because they don't have a problem with nudity hardly makes you sound "worthy of respect" yourself.
Refusing to give someone respect because they don't have a problem with nudity hardly makes you sound "worthy of respect" yourself.
If you actually read my post you might see that nudity is not where I have the problem, and being famous for nothing, a creative zero, a non-entity, celebrated solely for being a greedy sucker of the great money dick - is.
My lack of respect for Kardashian has nothing to do with the nudity. I merely despise her, her ilk and everything they do and propagate.
Kim Kardashian weather you like her or not is one of the most powerful woman on the planet. Mainly for her looks and sex appeal, but credit to her for making the most of what god gave her - people with more talent than her (most athletes, movie stars etc) couldn't dream of living the life she has, met the people she has, partied like she has, made the money she has, visited the countries she has etc for very little hard work.
Her business model has worked a charm. The Apprentice has nothing on her.
Hahahaha hilarious.
Perhaps you can explain what 'power' she has other than that to revolt/titillate?
And exactly how would you have heard that? Friends with some of her friends are we? Take regulat trips to NY and all the social hotspots of the world? Tell, please, tell, then I can boast I read a post by you in DS.
He's probably seen the video, she did a sex tape s while back, hmm classy.
It's the size of a small planet. Surely it can't be naturally that big?
Of course not! Simply google the before and afters. She used to look normal. Her face is fake too. She's had so much fillers in her cheek it's changed the shape of her eyes. She has a narrow face but she's tried to make herself look like she has wide cheekbones.
She and Nicki Minaj have had exactly the same things done to their bodies - they were both naturally slim women with small behinds and medium sized breasts. Then they had titanic arse implants, which also makes them look curvy from the front as it stretches their hips sideways. They also had boob implants, even though they didn't need them. I've seen a picture of KK lying down in a bikini, and you can see the outline of the implant against the natural breast tissue.
The effect of all this surgery for both of them is a cartoonish wasp-like figure. They still have their naturally little waists and limbs, but enormous fake curves.
Comments
You have a wife and woman you are allowed to have sex with?!?
Again, I never said not have a bush isn’t dignified. What I said was that I would have thought that most women posing fully naked for the world to see would prefer to have a bush so that their actual vagina bits aren’t on display. Its almost like you’re covering your bits with something, which would spare you some blushes. That’s why some actress choose to wear a merkin when doing a fully nude scene.
But I guess its something only women can answer – so girls, if you had to pose fully nude, would you support a bush or not?
Ah ok. I wasn't sure if it was a typo or not.
Well surely nude means completely bare. I'd just pose as I am. I wouldn't purposely grow hair to cover myself.
Of course she can get her kit off and get paid for it whenever she feels like it, but people are equally entitled to make a comment. Freedom of expression works both ways, and labeling a criticism as being down to 'jealousy' is a bit lazy. Appealing to the male libido is pretty easy, I think some see it as not much of a talent. Of course she has a figure that many straight males find attractive (big bum, big boobs), but that's not really a talent. Even if she hadn't had any surgery done, it's still not an achievement. I guess that's what gets talked about the most is why is she so famous for accomplishing so little? I really don't know, I had only heard of her when she got with Kanye, never heard of a sex tape before that, although I was aware of who her father was. Is it 'admirable' that she's made so much money for not doing much? For some I guess. We live in a world where the media is obsessed by celebs, it's a cycle that perpetuates itself. It's not really a part of my world, I don't watch reality shows or buy tabloid magazines, but it's also hard NOT to be aware of this sort of thing. I'm sure her fame will fade soon enough, the world that is celebrity is fickle.
Did I say, imply or insinuate it was, oh condescending one? And it has nothing to do with 'teenage girl porn', so take the stick out of your arse. If you enjoy receiving oral sex from your partner it's called common courtesy and its a two way street. If your partner likes pulling hairs from their teeth, more power to them.
😂
It was a joke, she's known for doing absolutely nothing that could be considered a work. She's not shy presenting various body parts, so why not go into porn. She could just lie on her back and get money for it, somebody else doing all the work. A lot of people would watch that
going viral has a new meaning.
Broke records etc.
Kim Kardashian weather you like her or not is one of the most powerful woman on the planet. Mainly for her looks and sex appeal, but credit to her for making the most of what god gave her - people with more talent than her (most athletes, movie stars etc) couldn't dream of living the life she has, met the people she has, partied like she has, made the money she has, visited the countries she has etc for very little hard work.
Her business model has worked a charm. The Apprentice has nothing on her.
Ewwww
Everyone is trying to copy the brilliant Kimmy Cakes.
I actually think that by having her arse that big, and her boobs big as well, it adds a lot of visual weight to her frame.
Shes always in the mags for being on a diet or feeling fat and frumpy. Maybe if her boobs and bum were a normal size she would appear a lot slimmer.
That being said i would kill to have a bigger bum, not that big but bigger. Maybe i can employ a photoshopper to draw me up some plans
Yes I know what you mean, especially with her being so short too, she has a tendency to look a bit matronly when clothed in anything other than curve clingy Lycra.
This is the same argument people used to use to defend Madonna back in the day. Someone explain to me why I'm supposed to be in awe of or look up to 'great businessmen/women', I've never quite understood. 'Oh well, she might be a shameless, artless ****, but she's made a lot of money at it.' Yeah. But also she's a shameless artless ****. That's not winning the game of life in my book.
It reminds me of that old joke about the hooker who comes back to her pimp having earned $100 and a nickel. "Who gave you a nickel?" "All of them".
I mean if you're willing to completely debase yourself and stand for nothing you can always make money. Any one of us here could be the personal toilet of a fat German and make a little coin. Let him film it, make even more. Let him invite his friends round, make even more. Doesn't mean you're worthy of respect or admiration does it.
Refusing to give someone respect because they don't have a problem with nudity hardly makes you sound "worthy of respect" yourself.
If you actually read my post you might see that nudity is not where I have the problem, and being famous for nothing, a creative zero, a non-entity, celebrated solely for being a greedy sucker of the great money dick - is.
My lack of respect for Kardashian has nothing to do with the nudity. I merely despise her, her ilk and everything they do and propagate.
Hahahaha hilarious.
Perhaps you can explain what 'power' she has other than that to revolt/titillate?
Unfortunately she has the power to inspire a generation of young girls to become fame hungry, talentless morons.
What else do this, she doesn't need the money.
He's probably seen the video, she did a sex tape s while back, hmm classy.
Agreed, she just wants people to talk about her. You can see by her smug face the night after the photos came out, that's exactly what she wanted.
It's the size of a small planet. Surely it can't be naturally that big?
Thats Katie price your confused with!!
No shit, REALLY?
Of course not! Simply google the before and afters. She used to look normal. Her face is fake too. She's had so much fillers in her cheek it's changed the shape of her eyes. She has a narrow face but she's tried to make herself look like she has wide cheekbones.
She and Nicki Minaj have had exactly the same things done to their bodies - they were both naturally slim women with small behinds and medium sized breasts. Then they had titanic arse implants, which also makes them look curvy from the front as it stretches their hips sideways. They also had boob implants, even though they didn't need them. I've seen a picture of KK lying down in a bikini, and you can see the outline of the implant against the natural breast tissue.
The effect of all this surgery for both of them is a cartoonish wasp-like figure. They still have their naturally little waists and limbs, but enormous fake curves.
In that case maybe the parents of said girls should question why they're raising a brood of shallow, easily led ****wits.