ED Rachel.
Im wondering whether her being a stroppy mare is leading up to her departure. In her return interview it was implied she was only back temporaily. I didnt like the fact she set Belle up. That was nasty. I know she has been treated badly, but Belle is still fragile. What do u think?
0
Comments
She's always been a nasty, cheating, using little bitch but not in an entertaining kind of way like a good soap bitch and the actress has a very drab screen presence.
I'm sad to say i found it very off-putting when Gemma Oaten said she thinks Rachel and Sam are a 'very special couple'.
I blame Skank Charity.>:(
Couldn't care less about Sam, though..Rachel would be better off without him.
That gruby skank is hardly a catch.
She should leave Sam and go and find a man in Australia. And she can take awful Ali with her!:p
LOL, don't blame Charity. Rachel slept with Charity's husband and got pregnant by him. Rachel should have been aware of the consequences of crossing the HBIC, so Rachel has no one to blame but herself.
I agree, I thought it was good when she reappeared at the time of Charity's trial, but i thought she would leave again shortly after.
I never liked her, and like her even less now. I was so glad when she and that jacket she seemed to permanently wear, were forced to leave, by Charity.
She and Ali should both go to a new life, far far away...
Charity did a really despicable number on Rachel but everyone seems to have forgotten about that. The Dingles were originally disgusted when they found out what she had done but now they are all 'Team Charity' and are treating Rachel like she's dirt - it's like they have all forgotten what Rachel was put through and I don't get it.
I also don't get why Rachel is now a right pain in the backside, I can't remember her being like that before. And that thing with the pills was just bizarre
Is this leading somewhere? Anywhere?
What she did to belle was horrible, hope Lisa slaps her one
I thought she was asked to leave before her contract was up as they needed to develop the Charity/Declan fire story line. She was always going to come back. And in my opinion she was one of the only nice people in it.
I agree, when she first came back to testify against Charity and catch Jai out with the fake Archie stuff, she seemed stronger and independent, not taking any nonsense of anyone, no matter who it is. Now, her bitterness against Charity is making her petty. Belle hadn't done anything wrong to her, yes she may have scared Samson while she was undergoing her relapse at the farm, but she was trying to make amends for that and Rachel was making sniping comments at her before Belle had even left the psychiatric center. Ok, fair enough, she was worried about Samson and Archie, but there was no need for the dig about leaving the welcome home banner up for when she next has to go away for treatment. And now utilizing Belle's illness to drive a wedge between Sam and his family.
I agree with everything about going away to save Sam from prison, but I don't think there's any excuse for her manipulating Sam by using Belle's illness. Even when Belle had walked in, she could have slyly have put the pills back where she found them, she didn't have to go through with it all. And to be fair, I hate Ali as a character, but she was being fed the lies from Jai about her being in rehab and that he somehow got Archie back from her. Rachel had had no contact with anyone in her family and she was depending on herself to get by, for all Ali knew, she could have fallen into addiction.
It feels like she can't possibly be staying. Maybe they really just brought her back for the trial and the big Archie reveal and are now writing her as a cow to give her a reason to leave again.
There's another thread with a rumour that the whole Spencer family are leaving, so maybe she'll go then, if it's true.
To me Rachel isn't acting any different to how she was introduced. Granted she's apparently more clever than I gave her credit for, but she's always been a user who is out for herself. The handouts she's had off of Jai all because she had his child. It's a good job I hate him too.
Pleeaase let it be true !!
Hey hey hey! He got her up the duff. He's 50% responsible for the Mini Beatle. He can pay and keep paying, as far as I'm concerned. :cool:
Specially as he's not likely to find anyone else who actually wants to mate with him enough to make more bebbies. :kitty: ;-)