How much would you bet that the benefits culture will still be here in 20 years?

radyagradyag Posts: 2,220
Forum Member
✭✭✭
I would bet my credit card limit of 12k.

Ive thought about it and bar some industrial revolotion happening again with an endless supply of un-skilled jobs in poor neighbourhoods, then I just dont see how they will ever get the 6 million folk off benefits.:confused: Can you?

Comments

  • Biffo the BearBiffo the Bear Posts: 25,859
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Our economy is structured in such a way that a benefits system is an absolute necessity. 100% employment for the able-bodied is an economic impossibility.
  • Ethel_FredEthel_Fred Posts: 34,127
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Given that nothing IDS has announced will deal with the workshy it's pretty certain that they'll be with us in 20 years time.

    The question though is it worth while dealing with the workshy when it costs far less to get people who want to work into work.
  • RussellIanRussellIan Posts: 12,034
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    It depends what the 'benefits culture' is.

    The people I generally see tied into this more often that not come under my 'c**t culture' category - which is immemorial.
  • gemma-the-huskygemma-the-husky Posts: 18,116
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    radyag wrote: »
    I would bet my credit card limit of 12k.

    Ive thought about it and bar some industrial revolotion happening again with an endless supply of un-skilled jobs in poor neighbourhoods, then I just dont see how they will ever get the 6 million folk off benefits.:confused: Can you?

    you lose. pay me now.
  • RichievillaRichievilla Posts: 6,179
    Forum Member
    radyag wrote: »
    I would bet my credit card limit of 12k.

    Ive thought about it and bar some industrial revolotion happening again with an endless supply of un-skilled jobs in poor neighbourhoods, then I just dont see how they will ever get the 6 million folk off benefits.:confused: Can you?

    The government are probably hoping that a few million elderly and disabled will die from the cold as a result of the greedy scumbag energy companies cartel bumping up their prices again, just in time for winter, surprise, surprise!
  • JonPaulWildJonPaulWild Posts: 3,122
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I have no problem with benefits / welfare for people who need it - in fact I'd like to see it raised for the disabled.

    However, for people who have criminal records, do drugs or just utterly work shy I would like to see their benefits scrapped.
  • LyricalisLyricalis Posts: 57,958
    Forum Member
    All I'm seeing on here are people in denial. There are plenty of people who are unemployed who want to work. There are not enough jobs for them at the moment. There may never be. Why fixate on the small number who don't want to work? It's the wrong target.
  • Dave HawkDave Hawk Posts: 6,654
    Forum Member
    For as long as we are riding the neoliberal merry-go-round (and the hell to those who fall off), and globalisation and technology is allowed to shatter our living standards, the "benefits culture" (or, more correctly, a heavy reliance on benefits), ain't going anywhere
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 3,290
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    radyag wrote: »
    I would bet my credit card limit of 12k.

    Ive thought about it and bar some industrial revolotion happening again with an endless supply of un-skilled jobs in poor neighbourhoods, then I just dont see how they will ever get the 6 million folk off benefits.:confused: Can you?

    This is the whole points the benefits shake up that IDS is proposing.

    The the next generation see their parents going out to work, albeit it may be just to get their benefits, but the cycle is broken and the children learn that money be earned.
  • Ethel_FredEthel_Fred Posts: 34,127
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Lyricalis wrote: »
    All I'm seeing on here are people in denial. There are plenty of people who are unemployed who want to work. There are not enough jobs for them at the moment. There may never be. Why fixate on the small number who don't want to work? It's the wrong target.
    Of course it's the wrong target, but coming up with something that costs nothing, is totally ineffectual and gives Heil readers an orgasm is "better" than doing something positive that costs money and might do something useful for people & this country. It's all about headlines, not doing good for this country.
  • LyricalisLyricalis Posts: 57,958
    Forum Member
    This is the whole points the benefits shake up that IDS is proposing.

    The the next generation see their parents going out to work, albeit it may be just to get their benefits, but the cycle is broken and the children learn that money be earned.

    No, the true lesson is that this government is just as willing to use public money to cover up the damage that globalisation has done to this country as the previous one was. One bloated the public sector to provide jobs in regions badly hit by the policies of the 1980s and now the next is going to make people do community service for benefits. It's the same principle, but modified to appeal to each party's supporters.
  • ClairebeeClairebee Posts: 746
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I have no problem with benefits / welfare for people who need it - in fact I'd like to see it raised for the disabled.

    However, for people who have criminal records, do drugs or just utterly work shy I would like to see their benefits scrapped.

    I'm sorry to say there are a few people who claim disability who milk/cheat the system ( I know of at least one, well 2 if you include my mother in law!)

    And there are some people who may have a criminal record, who have/had turned their lives around.

    Not everything is black and white (unfortunatley)

    You'll never get rid of lazy buggers, you'll never get rid of poverty (dispite what Bono says) and you can never irradicate greed (Phillip Green amoungst others!) :D
  • Ethel_FredEthel_Fred Posts: 34,127
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    This is the whole points the benefits shake up that IDS is proposing.

    The the next generation see their parents going out to work, albeit it may be just to get their benefits, but the cycle is broken and the children learn that money be earned.
    They'll see their parents going to work for a few weeks a year, then they'll see them spend the next 11 months at home having gained nothing. Exactly how is that supposed to encourage the next generation to work?
  • JosquiusJosquius Posts: 1,514
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Our economy is structured in such a way that a benefits system is an absolute necessity. 100% employment for the able-bodied is an economic impossibility.

    I disagree, its a absolute possibility, its a very bad one however. A bit of unemployment is far preferable to a labour shortage.
  • psionicpsionic Posts: 20,188
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I have no problem with benefits / welfare for people who need it - in fact I'd like to see it raised for the disabled.

    However, for people who have criminal records, do drugs or just utterly work shy I would like to see their benefits scrapped.

    The trouble with that is that you're going to end up with a far larger, and many cases costlier prison population instead.
  • David SteinbergDavid Steinberg Posts: 1,221
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Lyricalis wrote: »
    All I'm seeing on here are people in denial. There are plenty of people who are unemployed who want to work. There are not enough jobs for them at the moment. There may never be. Why fixate on the small number who don't want to work? It's the wrong target.

    Exactly.

    There'll never be 100% work for everyone able to work
  • David SteinbergDavid Steinberg Posts: 1,221
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    This is the whole points the benefits shake up that IDS is proposing.

    The the next generation see their parents going out to work, albeit it may be just to get their benefits, but the cycle is broken and the children learn that money be earned.

    So slave labour is something you'd support then?
  • Sir DavisSir Davis Posts: 467
    Forum Member
    It certainly won't be like today - that's for sure.

    I'd imagine we'll have a load of people in shared accommodation, as opposed to single family-occupied homes today. They'll still be in estates along with government created settlements created on the outskirts of towns. This is the fate of those who don't work.
  • CharnhamCharnham Posts: 61,332
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    However, for people who have criminal records, do drugs or just utterly work shy I would like to see their benefits scrapped.
    I am not saying this is a reason to keep them on benefits, but again lets not pretend that those people (with the histories you mention) are not going to start a life of crime, and cost all of us more personally (higher crime rate, higher insurance rates) but also the cost of policing, justice, and maybe prison time.

    As I said not a reason to keep them on benefits, but its worth pointing out.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 4,663
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    radyag wrote: »
    I would bet my credit card limit of 12k.

    Ive thought about it and bar some industrial revolotion happening again with an endless supply of un-skilled jobs in poor neighbourhoods, then I just dont see how they will ever get the 6 million folk off benefits.:confused: Can you?

    I wouldn't bet on it.

    I remember when the run down areas of Britain were full of people who got up early and went off to work, work in the mills, work in the factories, work in the mines. I remember these people fighting to keep their jobs, they didn't want to be on the dole, they fought hard not to be on the dole but the rich could make more from buying abroad and using oil instead of coal. I saw entire streets, whole areas, towns thrown out of work at the same time. I saw the police force turned into a private army to enforce it.

    Now those MPs who saw nothing wrong with claiming tax payers money for a house they did not have sit in the House and talk of those who have grown up in houses where no one works.

    It wasn't the unemployed who caused this crisis, the money we give the unemployed they give us back, it stays in the system, they give it to the shopkeepers and the utility companies they give it to the tax man in VAT, they don't spirit away to some offshore account. It's the £850,000,000,000 we gave the bankers that caused this crisis, those same bankers who give themselves billions in bonuses.

    It wouldn't surprise me if we had no welfare state at all in another 10 years, if hospitals were just for the rich and the insured, if those who could not get work were left begging for food on street corners. It wouldn't surprise me if those who espoused the capitalist system and condemned the socialist yet still came cap in hand for socialist money when they became the victims of their own greed didn't take our money and run. They're capitalists, that's what they do, all that matters is the bottom line.

    It's easy to get 6 million people off benefits, you just stop giving them the benefits, that's what they're starting to do isn't it?
  • rusty123rusty123 Posts: 22,872
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    fredc wrote: »
    I remember when the run down areas of Britain were full of people who got up early and went off to work, work in the mills, work in the factories, work in the mines. I remember these people fighting to keep their jobs, they didn't want to be on the dole, they fought hard not to be on the dole but the rich could make more from buying abroad and using oil instead of coal. I saw entire streets, whole areas, towns thrown out of work at the same time. I saw the police force turned into a private army to enforce it.

    Did anybody else reading this (above) have the Hovis tune playing in the back of their head? :)
  • LyricalisLyricalis Posts: 57,958
    Forum Member
    rusty123 wrote: »
    Did anybody else reading this (above) have the Hovis tune playing in the back of their head? :)

    It does feel a bit like that. It's true though, we had far fewer people on benefits back then. The blame for the present mess should be fairly placed on recent governments and business leaders and not the victims. I'm getting really fed up with certain people going all 80s Tory on here and laying into those without work all the time. I guess their next target will be single parents, it usually is.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 4,663
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    rusty123 wrote: »
    Did anybody else reading this (above) have the Hovis tune playing in the back of their head? :)

    You think 3 million people losing their jobs is funny?

    Says it all don't it.
  • radyagradyag Posts: 2,220
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    fredc wrote: »
    You think 3 million people losing their jobs is funny?

    Says it all don't it.

    Sadly some people dont care about what happened in the 80s. But your right, back then people actually worked and society had a purpose.

    Just look at the state of these council estates today!:(:(
Sign In or Register to comment.