Another one of those grandstanding big clever statement posts that entirely fails to back itself up. Brilliant.
Not sure what pushed your buttons regarding my post but don't really care, either.
If I don't feel like going into copious detail "backing up" my statements, that is my entitlement. Where in the rulebook does it say that you cannot make a statement that stands on it's own merits??
I've recently been watching the second series with Amy on Netflix. They have an intro bit about Amy having an imaginary friend when she was a child who came back when she was a grown up (or something like that?) That sort of sets it up as it is about Amy and the Doctor rather than the other way round.
I'm guessing that it is for the American TV version (also thought it had flash backs in it that wasn't in the UK version?) They haven't got the Clara episodes on there yet, but I am wondering if they have a similar intro for her? And how would it explain her back story??
Not sure what pushed your buttons regarding my post but don't really care, either.
If I don't feel like going into copious detail "backing up" my statements, that is my entitlement. Where in the rulebook does it say that you cannot make a statement that stands on it's own merits??
Ignore it or report it - don't engage with it - trust me.
Comments
Not sure what pushed your buttons regarding my post but don't really care, either.
If I don't feel like going into copious detail "backing up" my statements, that is my entitlement. Where in the rulebook does it say that you cannot make a statement that stands on it's own merits??
I'm guessing that it is for the American TV version (also thought it had flash backs in it that wasn't in the UK version?) They haven't got the Clara episodes on there yet, but I am wondering if they have a similar intro for her? And how would it explain her back story??
Ignore it or report it - don't engage with it - trust me.
Thank you