I don't see the big personally. I hope this isn't what Chris Bryant has been crusading for. If so its a big let down. All he's doing is talking about a horse. Hardly news worthy.
I don't see the big personally. I hope this isn't what Chris Bryant has been crusading for. If so its a big let down. All he's doing is talking about a horse. Hardly news worthy.
I can't see the point to this - the bigger question is how the papers got hold of them surely
I can't see the point to this - the bigger question is how the papers got hold of them surely
That's always the biggest question for people who don't like what's being revealed...........they always try to make 'the leak' the story rather than the content
I wouldn't be at all surprised. Chris Bryant seems to have been implying that in his wording in parliament the other day too:
"Why will the Prime Minister not publish all the texts, e-mails and other forms of correspondence between himself and his office and Rebekah Brooks, Andy Coulson and News International, so that we can judge whether they are relevant? Is it because they are too salacious and embarrassing for the Prime Minister? [ Interruption. ] I would not smile if I was him; when the truth comes out, he will not be smiling."
The problem for Cameron is that the longer he keeps them secret the more people will believe that he was shagging her, even if he wasn't.
Hope they find out who leaked these to the press. They appeare to have been given to Leveson and his inquiry and someone has clearly breached confidentiality.
These are texts not the emails Bryant referred to aren't they?
Cameron's horseplay texts with Rebekah Brooks:
Mail link
David Cameron faces new embarrassment over text messages
The message, along with a second text from Mrs Brooks, was obtained by The Mail on Sunday newspaper.
The message from Mrs Brooks praised the Conservative leader’s conference speech. “I cried twice,” she wrote. “Will love working together.”
Downing Street said the texts were submitted to Lord Leveson’s inquiry into phone hacking, but only a small number of messages have been made public by the peer so far.
These two texts were sent in October 2009, shortly after Mrs Brooks was promoted from editor of The Sun to chief executive of News International. It is thought they were supplied to the inquiry by Mrs Brooks.
There might be some overlap, but I don't think it's all of what Bryant was talking about, no.
Indeed, Bryant claims to have a mole in downing street who is familiar with the texts and they told him that they are salacious, Bryant seems to know quite a bit like the amount of texts -150 which is also what the observer is saying, observer also seems to know that some of the texts will very embarrassing for the government
Indeed, Bryant claims to have a mole in downing street who is familiar with the texts and they told him that they are salacious, Bryant seems to know quite a bit like the amount of texts -150 which is also what the observer is saying, observer also seems to know that some of the texts will very embarrassing for the government
I'd be interested to hear Bryant's definition of "salacious" lol.
Indeed, Bryant claims to have a mole in downing street who is familiar with the texts and they told him that they are salacious, Bryant seems to know quite a bit like the amount of texts -150 which is also what the observer is saying, observer also seems to know that some of the texts will very embarrassing for the government
Comments
I can't see the point to this - the bigger question is how the papers got hold of them surely
Don't know, but she sure seems to have had Cameron wrapped around her little finger.
So it is part of the story of how close Governments and the Murdoch empire had become.
In bed together you might say.
Quite literally in the case of the Brown Government perhaps - afterall it was Sarah Brown who hosted the infamous pyjamas parties at Chequers;)
I wouldn't be surprised if Murdoch Snr is behind it. I know the Mail is not a NI paper but.....
Well she has spent 3 nights at Chequers
That's always the biggest question for people who don't like what's being revealed...........they always try to make 'the leak' the story rather than the content
It never works
Not keeping them secret, they were not relevant and by the looks of them they were not.
There was transparency?
Umm they were, Brooks said to Cameron "I'll look forward to working with you", working together on what?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2227459/Camerons-horseplay-texts-Rebekah-Brooks-Intimate-messages-PM-reveal-likes-fast-unpredicatable-ride.html
Probably said something very similar to Brown and Blair!
I wouldn't be at all surprised. Chris Bryant seems to have been implying that in his wording in parliament the other day too:
The problem for Cameron is that the longer he keeps them secret the more people will believe that he was shagging her, even if he wasn't.
Cameron's horseplay texts with Rebekah Brooks:
Mail link
David Cameron faces new embarrassment over text messages
The message, along with a second text from Mrs Brooks, was obtained by The Mail on Sunday newspaper.
The message from Mrs Brooks praised the Conservative leader’s conference speech. “I cried twice,” she wrote. “Will love working together.”
Downing Street said the texts were submitted to Lord Leveson’s inquiry into phone hacking, but only a small number of messages have been made public by the peer so far.
These two texts were sent in October 2009, shortly after Mrs Brooks was promoted from editor of The Sun to chief executive of News International. It is thought they were supplied to the inquiry by Mrs Brooks.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9653819/David-Cameron-faces-new-embarrassment-over-text-messages.html
There might be some overlap, but I don't think it's all of what Bryant was talking about, no.
Personally I'd rather shag the horse.
Indeed, Bryant claims to have a mole in downing street who is familiar with the texts and they told him that they are salacious, Bryant seems to know quite a bit like the amount of texts -150 which is also what the observer is saying, observer also seems to know that some of the texts will very embarrassing for the government
I'd be interested to hear Bryant's definition of "salacious" lol.
Well I hope this mole is found and dismissed.
You need help