That's how I read it too. Certainly not anti-immigration and a comment on next week's by election. I'm guessing Banksy isn't a UKIP supporter......
Depends on how you read it.
If you come from the position that nobody has the right to decide who lives/settles in their country, then yes.
On the other hand, what's wrong with the people of a country not wanting immigration?
One thing I do wonder if deliberate.
The signs being held up, one says "keep off our worms".
But the bird reading the signs would never, ever catch a worm in it's life.
It's a swallow/house martin/swift.
If you come from the position that nobody has the right to decide who lives/settles in their country, then yes.
On the other hand, what's wrong with the people of a country not wanting immigration?
One thing I do wonder if deliberate.
The signs being held up, one says "keep off our worms".
But the bird reading the signs would never, ever catch a worm in it's life.
It's a swallow/house martin/swift.
Ignorance is immutable in those who cannot accept anything other than their own opinion as fact. In other news, water is wet. Feel free to argue that point if you like.
If you come from the position that nobody has the right to decide who lives/settles in their country, then yes.
On the other hand, what's wrong with the people of a country not wanting immigration?
One thing I do wonder if deliberate.
The signs being held up, one says "keep off our worms".
But the bird reading the signs would never, ever catch a worm in it's life.
It's a swallow/house martin/swift.
The keep off our worms is highlighting the ignorance of the pigeon towards the swallow who as you rightly point out doesn't eat worms.
Swallows migrate, they do so to live and find the food needed. Much like some immigrants from Africa (note I said some!).
Ignorance is immutable in those who cannot accept anything other than their own opinion as fact. In other news, water is wet. Feel free to argue that point if you like.
There is nothing subtle about banksy's wall stains. He's just another 'social commentator' who wants to point out all the problems in society but not do anything to actually resolve them.
There is nothing subtle about banksy's wall stains. He's just another 'social commentator' who wants to point out all the problems in society but not do anything to actually resolve them.
If the point of social commentary art is to ignite debate then he's emphatically succeeded, albeit in a way he probably didn't anticipate.
There is nothing subtle about banksy's wall stains. He's just another 'social commentator' who wants to point out all the problems in society but not do anything to actually resolve them.
Didn't one of his murals raise over £400k and save a boys club from closing?
If the ***** in Clacton hadn't destroyed this one it could have raised £250K easily.
Comments
We are all pigeons, and the exotic birds are polish and bulgarian plumbers.
Depends on how you read it.
If you come from the position that nobody has the right to decide who lives/settles in their country, then yes.
On the other hand, what's wrong with the people of a country not wanting immigration?
One thing I do wonder if deliberate.
The signs being held up, one says "keep off our worms".
But the bird reading the signs would never, ever catch a worm in it's life.
It's a swallow/house martin/swift.
Pigeons don't eat worms either. They're seed eaters
Ignorance is immutable in those who cannot accept anything other than their own opinion as fact. In other news, water is wet. Feel free to argue that point if you like.
Swallows migrate, they do so to live and find the food needed. Much like some immigrants from Africa (note I said some!).
There is nothing subtle about banksy's wall stains. He's just another 'social commentator' who wants to point out all the problems in society but not do anything to actually resolve them.
If the point of social commentary art is to ignite debate then he's emphatically succeeded, albeit in a way he probably didn't anticipate.
Didn't one of his murals raise over £400k and save a boys club from closing?
If the ***** in Clacton hadn't destroyed this one it could have raised £250K easily.