Man caught masturbating to Alan Sugar's book

Comments

• [Deleted User] Posts: 2,563

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  15/12/10 - 12:01 #2

  Wasn't Stuart Ballbags was it?

  0
• Picto Posts: 24,270

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  15/12/10 - 12:03 #3

  Brings a whole new meaning to Sugarcane.

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 3,609

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  15/12/10 - 12:06 #4

  Firing blanks?

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 4,827

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  15/12/10 - 12:37 #5

  :d:d:d

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 1,113

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  15/12/10 - 12:48 #6

  Sugar Daddy and "You're Fired" have new meanings.

  0
• tysonstorm Posts: 24,609

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  15/12/10 - 12:53 #7

  And I just thought that Lord Sugar was a w*nker.

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 1,113

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  15/12/10 - 12:57 #8

  tysonstorm wrote: »

  And I just thought that Lord Sugar was a w*nker.

  
  w*nkers breed w*nkers apparently.

  0
• HarrisonMarks Posts: 4,360

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  15/12/10 - 13:01 #9

  Is 'masturbating to' correct? I would have thought 'at' or possibly 'with'.'Over' as in the OP gives perhaps too vivid a picture.

  0
• cnbcwatcher Posts: 56,681

  Forum Member

  ✭

  15/12/10 - 13:27 #10

  That's weird

  0
• Goneril Posts: 1,257

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  15/12/10 - 13:35 #11

  Awww bless him, he only wanted some sweet loving.:D

  0
• Sexbomb Posts: 20,005

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  15/12/10 - 13:35 #12

  gives a whole new meaning to say your fired, literaly he could have fired lol

  0
• SJ_Mental Posts: 16,138

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  15/12/10 - 14:09 #13

  I didn't think this book would interest me, Shall have to give it a read lol.

  0
• darkthunder35 Posts: 5,016

  Forum Member

  ✭

  15/12/10 - 14:11 #14

  SJ_Mental wrote: »

  I didn't think this book would interest me, Shall have to give it a read lol.

  
  :D:D

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 7,103

  Forum Member

  ✭

  15/12/10 - 14:38 #15

  "Outraging public decency" LOL. How quaint!
  
  I wonder what he was wanking about. If it's pictures of some of the hot apprentices then that's understandable but if it's Lord Sugar talking about Amstrad CPC464s then that's an achievement. I mean it's interesting because I used to have one, but it's not really wank material.

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 69

  Forum Member

  ✭

  15/12/10 - 14:43 #16

  Must be a really good read then

  0
• rockerchick Posts: 9,255

  Forum Member

  ✭

  15/12/10 - 14:51 #17

  Brilliant!

  0
• RubusRoo Posts: 10,262

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  15/12/10 - 14:51 #18

  Just goes to prove that if you've thought about it, someone else has wanked over it.

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 5,733

  Forum Member

  ✭

  15/12/10 - 14:54 #19

  Security guard(s) - Well, I guess? No longer can problems be dealt
  with by a quick glare or a "shush" from a scary, spinsterly librarian.

  0
• ItHasPotential Posts: 7,817

  Forum Member

  ✭

  15/12/10 - 15:09 #20

  "you're fired"
  "no i'm not because the jokes on you"

  0
• RubusRoo Posts: 10,262

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  15/12/10 - 15:14 #21

  Reminds me of that guy who was convicted of a murder he committed 15 years ago under double jeopardy. A woman caught him wanking over a bra so he smashed her skull in with a hammer
  
  Men are so pathetically shallow. Well, some of them.

  0
• Minjury Posts: 415

  Forum Member

  ✭

  15/12/10 - 15:16 #22

  RubusRoo wrote: »

  Reminds me of that guy who was convicted of a murder he committed 15 years ago under double jeopardy. A woman caught him wanking over a bra so he smashed her skull in with a hammer
  
  Men are so pathetically shallow. Well, some of them.

  
  ....

  0
• epicurian Posts: 19,291

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  15/12/10 - 15:20 #23

  Minjury wrote: »

  ....

  
  I concur. Wrong thread maybe? I know I've done it. lol

  0
• Jason Posts: 76,557

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  15/12/10 - 15:21 #24

  Minjury wrote: »

  ....

  
  I'll second that .. an utterly bizarre post to crowbar in ..

  0
• Minjury Posts: 415

  Forum Member

  ✭

  15/12/10 - 15:21 #25

  epicurian wrote: »

  I concur. Wrong thread maybe? I know I've done it. lol

  
  I hope so!

  0
• gmphmac Posts: 2,212

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  15/12/10 - 15:50 #26

  "masturbatory wank"
  
  Isn't that the same thing?

  0