Daniel Craig has now played Bond as long as Connery did
I still think of Daniel Craig as the "new" Bond. Then I realised it is nine years since he made his debut in Casino Royale. That means he has now equalled Sean Connery who also played the role for nine years from 1962 - 1971. (Yes I know he came back in 1983 for the unofficial film so that technically means he played the role over a period of 21 years.) But in terms of the official series I can't believe he will soon have beaten Connery. Brosnan did four films in seven years so Craig has already surpassed that. So another three to four years in the role and he could actually equal or beat Roger Moore and become the longest serving Bond actor. I suppose its the long gap between films nowadays that has helped. Maybe if there had been a Bond film in 2010 and this was his fifth then maybe he would be calling it a day.
0
Comments
Now the question is whether he can leave on a high. Connery outstayed his welcome as did Pierce Brosnan and Roger Moore (though Moore was never a remotely good Bond anyway haha!). I still think Craig has one more in him after Spectre. Spectre looks soooo good :cool:
I found the last two Craig Bond films very empty.
Quantum and Skyfall, just felt like set pieces with little heart to them, more like Bourne films rather than Bond films.
The first two films were better.
Quantum of Solace definitely was a hollow movie but even here Craig carried himself off very well. Skyfall was a terrific nod to Bond's history (being the 50th anniversay and all...) whilst remaining forward thinking. It's the movie Die Another Day should have been. Plus a classic villain in Silva and the great visual work by Deakins makes it a classic Bond movie.
The Bourne movies were a good kick up the arse for the Bond movies (though I'll admit they went too far with Quantum...). But there are PLENTY of great classic Bond movies in CR and Skyfall. Even in QoS when Bond confronts the Quantum organization at the opera, that was classic Bond.
Plus Craig would annihalate Connery in a fight :cool:
I preferred 'Die Another Day' to 'Skyfall'.
Yes it was OTT and a bit camp, but it had everything I prefer in a bond film.
I like the realism Craig has brought to the franchise but it just needs a bit more gadgetry and world domination, rather than just spy vs spy stuff.
Not forgetting his character in The Rock is basically James Bond
Because even though people often compare Craig to Connery as a rough and tough Bond, Connery also delivered many humorous lines. Not to the extent of Moore, and not so much with the corny punchlines, but Connery's Bond frequently displayed a dark and sarcastic sense of humour. Craig seems a bit more serious, like Dalton.
So even though I like Craig as Bond, I wouldn't personally say he was better.
Dalton was definitely the first 'serious' Bond. There was a lot of grit about him. In some ways he's the true precursor to Craig's era. But Craig is easily the most 'complete' Bond to date. He is tough as nails and actually looks convincing in a fight. But he can also be really smooth without coming off like a complete buffoon like Moore did or even sometimes Connery/Brosnan.
Craig is the only one who can act too so his Bond has another layer of depth his predecessors never had.
I tend to agree with you. The Bourne movies have had a strong influence on the later Bond movies and the humour has suffered. I don't find myself wanting to revisit any of the Craig outings that much.
Also the idea that Daniel Craig has been Bond for as long as Connery isn't quite right. Craig has played the character in three movies which means he hasn't appeared on screen as James Bond as long as Connery or Moore for example.
His thuggish blonde eastern European looks are not classic James Bond, and i reckon future fans will look back in dismay at such an ordinary actor attaining such longevity in the role.
Eastern European? At least Craig didn't have to wear a pathetic toupe like Connery lol! And Craig looked far more English than the caked up oraganutanesque Connery with his awful makeup. And the less said about the even more horrid look of acting 'asian' in You Only Live Twice, the better
DC is the definitive Bond.
My point is that he has been employed in the role of as long as Connery was. In fact if we are being picky you could say it is longer. Connery left in 1967 after five years and then came back for a one off in 1971 so it could be argued that Connery was employed in the role for six years in total. Craig has never left the series in nine years. But yes he has made fewer movies and has not appeared on screen as much as Connery did in nine years.
Erm, am I being thick here, but Quantum is the second film.
How can it be better while at the same time you didn't like it?
I couldn't disagree more. If we're talking about the best Bond - which will always be subjective - I would like to think of who embodies Ian Fleming's James Bond. For me, that is Daniel Craig.
Fleming's Bond was not a tuxedoed playboy swanning around the world pushing buttons with a martini in one hand and a merry wisecrack for every occasion. Fleming's Bond was a paid assassin on the side of the "good" guys. He was a man who didn't like killing but liked to do his job well. He was frequently beset by moral doubts and questions about his profession.
Ian Fleming didn't approve of Connery. After their first meeting, Fleming told a family member: "That was a thousand miles away from my idea of James Bond. Everything is wrong - the face, the accent and the hair." But I'm sure he would have approved of Craig, who embodies the character perfectly.
He doesn't even need 'time'. This guy is already an insanely popular Bond and it's his gritty portrayal along with decent movies around him that have rebooted Bond for a new generation. At worst he's considered the second best Bond by some. There was hate for Craig at the start when he was known as the 'Blonde Bond' but he blew everyone away with Casino Royale. Even when Quantum of Solace received a bashing, Daniel Craig was shielded from criticism because he was the one excellent thing about the movie. And of Skyfall was simply the biggest Bond success to date.
Craig is a great Bond and has rejuvenated the Bond series for a new generation. I seriously hope he carries on beyond Spectre. He's got at least two more movies in him after this one, especially when you consider Moore was pushing 60 by the time he left the role.
Both Connery and Moore played the roles until a much older age and were in less than top physical condition for most of their films
If you wanted a Bond that more closely resembles Fleming's writings that surely Lazenby was the man?
It's funny when Dalton took on the role, the audience was split 50/50 on Connery/Moore. Now Sir Roger has been lost in the discussion and people easily labeling his movies as 'camp'. Though in reality Sir Roger had everything: he had the voice, the body, the hair and the general gentleman personality that makes a great Bond. His movies also, feature a greater variety of emotions, better bad guys and sidekicks.
Finally he's also the Bond that bedded the most women by far and all of them were the right age!
Disagree completely. You may prefer Craig but to say the others cannot act is complete BS
I have always thought Roger Moore was an underrated Bond, particularly during his later outings when he really came into his own. For Your Eyes Only and Octopussy are both thoroughly entertaining, and I rather liked the presentation of 007 as an ageing, worldly-wise hero from a bygone era of gentleman spies. The Moore era also had, hands down, the most interesting villains: Scaramanga, Jaws, Mayday, Zorin, Dr Kananga, Hugo Drax, etc.
But then I love Daniel Craig's interpretation of the character too. He's brought something new to the role, and his tenure has given the series new life. After Dalton, I think Craig's Bond is the one that most closely resembles that of the Fleming literature; not physically of course, but the character is spot on.