Options
Mother locks her two children in bedroom so she can live with paedophile
gregrichards
Posts: 4,913 Forum Member
✭✭✭
"Two young sisters are being locked inside an alarmed bedroom at night to protect them from their mother’s paedophile husband – and social workers say it’s fine.
The authorities have astonishingly given the go-ahead to the monstrous plan the mum dreamed up so she can sleep with their vile stepfather.
The convicted abuser, once jailed for attacking a girl under 13, has now been allowed to move in with her and the *children – also both under 13.
And among other ‘safety’ factors believed to have been taken into account in a shocking official report was that the *paedophile would have to climb over the mum from his side of the bed to get to the girls – and would therefore wake her up.
County council officials who rubber-stamped the decision were also happy that the imprisoned children could use a baby monitor to call for their mother if they needed to be let out to go to the toilet.
They allowed the child abuser to move in only a few months after describing him as a “continuing risk” to the girls.
Details of the decision emerged after the children’s worried grandmother contacted the Sunday Mirror over her fears for their safety. She said: “The alarm and the other so-called precautions to stop my granddaughters being abused are a load of rubbish.
“Since learning my daughter’s new husband was a paedophile I’ve tried to express my concerns to social *services.
“I’m appalled this man was allowed to move into the family home with my granddaughters. Other family members also feel their concerns are being ignored.
“It feels like my granddaughters are isolated and at risk. Social services don’t seem to want to listen to me.
“It’s heartbreaking, but I have to keep fighting this for the sake of the girls.”
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/mum-locks-young-girls-bedroom-5546343
What is this mother playing at? Why be in a relationship with a paedophile and put your kids near him? It is a disgrace the council have allowed him to live under the same roof as kids. I thought paedophiles were banned from living with children.
The authorities have astonishingly given the go-ahead to the monstrous plan the mum dreamed up so she can sleep with their vile stepfather.
The convicted abuser, once jailed for attacking a girl under 13, has now been allowed to move in with her and the *children – also both under 13.
And among other ‘safety’ factors believed to have been taken into account in a shocking official report was that the *paedophile would have to climb over the mum from his side of the bed to get to the girls – and would therefore wake her up.
County council officials who rubber-stamped the decision were also happy that the imprisoned children could use a baby monitor to call for their mother if they needed to be let out to go to the toilet.
They allowed the child abuser to move in only a few months after describing him as a “continuing risk” to the girls.
Details of the decision emerged after the children’s worried grandmother contacted the Sunday Mirror over her fears for their safety. She said: “The alarm and the other so-called precautions to stop my granddaughters being abused are a load of rubbish.
“Since learning my daughter’s new husband was a paedophile I’ve tried to express my concerns to social *services.
“I’m appalled this man was allowed to move into the family home with my granddaughters. Other family members also feel their concerns are being ignored.
“It feels like my granddaughters are isolated and at risk. Social services don’t seem to want to listen to me.
“It’s heartbreaking, but I have to keep fighting this for the sake of the girls.”
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/mum-locks-young-girls-bedroom-5546343
What is this mother playing at? Why be in a relationship with a paedophile and put your kids near him? It is a disgrace the council have allowed him to live under the same roof as kids. I thought paedophiles were banned from living with children.
0
Comments
It wouldn't surprise me if we find out how it worked out later this year on the Jeremy Kyle show. What a stupid woman.
' social workers say it’s fine' ...
And if they were your kids?
Typically the Mirror article describes him as 'a Paedophile' but his conviction was for "attacking a girl under 13". That doesn't necessarily make him a Paedophile.
And if he does indeed have previous child sex offences.....who in their right mind thinks offences like that are only ever committed during the night?
BIB Exactly what i was thinking, what happens to the children during day time hour's, they maybe at school but what about the school holiday's. Does this so called mother realize that Paedophile's don't clock on and off to abuse children. Children have been removed from home's for less than this, they should be removed and if possible live with the grandmother, as it's clear the mother isnt concerned about there safety.
The Mirror should be proud. It's fast catching up to The Fail.
I don't find this report credible at all.
I doubt that the paper has made it up.
It says in the article he is subject to a Sexual Offences Prevention order and has also had to sign the Sex Offenders register, which, for me at least, certainly suggests a sexual element to his criminal behaviour.
While I certainly don't think the mirror have basically made this up out of thin air, like most newspaper articles in any paper, we're probably not being told the whole story.
If it is like they have said and there's nothing else to it, the decision to let him live with her when she has two daughters, if they're underage/before they've reached puberty, is absolutely insane!
The quote below from the article says that he's been convicted of child sex offences.
I don't know if a tabloid would totally make up a story like this. Maybe not give all the facts, but totally make a one up?
I'm guessing the mother must be weak when it comes to how she feels about him.
The thought of a paedophile's hands touching my body turns my stomach.
I can well believe that, horrible though it is.
But I don't believe, especially given all the recent publicity about child abuse, that Social Services would sanction those arrangements.
It does seem totally ridiculous when you think about how parents/mothers have probably had their child taken from them for less.
Exactly.
Slightly unrelated, I note the article has a 'popular' side link list which includes something about women copying a cleavage boosting thing done by some cartoon character who absolutely doesn't look under-age at all because that is down to it being a cartoon and the particular style. Not that I'm making any kind of comparison with their sidebar and what gets hits on tabloid websites in general at all whatsoever...