MacBook Pro

Hello - I am thinking of buying a MacBook pro. I keep changing my mind though. One minute I think the £1,500 is a solid investment. Then I think for £1,000 I could buy another laptop.

Somebody please tell me what they think of the pros and cons of spending that extra £1,000.

Main tasks I will use it for is

Football Manager
Photoshop
MS Office (Mainly Access, Excel, PowerPoint and Word)
Music Production

I do also have an Ipad and Iphone.
«1345

Comments

  • paulj48paulj48 Posts: 1,122
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Dont forget if you spend £1500 on the Macbook Pro you'll need another £600+ to spend on a copy of Photoshop.
  • chrisjrchrisjr Posts: 33,282
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Do you already have Mac OS compatible versions of those programs? I believe Football Manager has both on the same disk but I don't think Office does. Not sure about the others.

    If you don't have Mac compatible versions then that is extra you will need to spend on top of the price of the Macbook.
  • paulj48paulj48 Posts: 1,122
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Also Access is not available in Office for Mac, you'd have to run the Windows version via Bootcamp or Parallels on OSX
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 6
    Forum Member
    Software is not an issue in terms of being a show stopper. Didn't know that about Access. Is it difficult to configure a dual boot of Windows and Mac OS?
  • user123456789user123456789 Posts: 16,589
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    secu wrote: »
    Software is not an issue in terms of being a show stopper. Didn't know that about Access. Is it difficult to configure a dual boot of Windows and Mac OS?

    Could you not use LibreOffice Base instead of Access?

    http://www.libreoffice.org/download/?nodetect
  • mred2000mred2000 Posts: 10,050
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    secu wrote: »
    Is it difficult to configure a dual boot of Windows and Mac OS?

    There are numerous avenues for making this relatively straightforward.

    Just check the T&Cs of any software you're using (if going the legal route...) as some companies limit, or don't support at all, software loaded on a Win partition on a Mac.

    Personally, for those uses, I'd stick with a PC.
    If you were doing much more video or graphic work then it'd be a close one. Obviously, it's always down to user preference.
  • RecurringRecurring Posts: 287
    Forum Member
    I think the only one of those things that warrants the Macbook is music production for Logic, but unless you're serious about it you might want to stick with a laptop and use another Windows compatible DAW and save yourself the difference. Otherwise I'd go for the Macbook, definately a solid investment.
  • MassiveDynamicsMassiveDynamics Posts: 661
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    secu wrote: »
    Software is not an issue in terms of being a show stopper. Didn't know that about Access. Is it difficult to configure a dual boot of Windows and Mac OS?

    Boot camp is very easy - but it only supports Windows 7.

    It will partition the HD, download the drivers and puts them on a USB stick (or CD/DVD if you have a drive).

    I had installed an SSD in my MacBook Pro last summer but only did a boot camp install yesterday (need direct access to the hardware and I don't have a Windows laptop nowadays).
  • chenkschenks Posts: 13,231
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Boot camp is very easy - but it only supports Windows 7.

    no, you can run Windows XP as well, and no doubt Vista if you really wanted to.
  • paulj48paulj48 Posts: 1,122
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    anniebrion wrote: »
    Could you not use LibreOffice Base instead of Access?

    Filemaker Pro is a database program for the Mac, gets very good reviews too.
  • paulj48paulj48 Posts: 1,122
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    chenks wrote: »
    no, you can run Windows XP as well, and no doubt Vista if you really wanted to.

    Not with the latest version of Bootcamp that comes with Mountain Lion.
  • chenkschenks Posts: 13,231
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    paulj48 wrote: »
    Not with the latest version of Bootcamp that comes with Mountain Lion.

    still possible if you want to.
    plenty of tutorials that will guide you thru the process.
  • MassiveDynamicsMassiveDynamics Posts: 661
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    You could use XP unofficially but you would be unsupported by Apple and in early 2014 unsupported by Microsoft as well.

    Only the bottom of the range MBP has 4Gb of ram, all the rest have 8Gb so XP would kind of wasted on the hardware - is the dual GPU switching set up even supported by XP?
  • cnbcwatchercnbcwatcher Posts: 56,681
    Forum Member
    Tricky one OP but it's up to you really. If you feel you'd be better off buying the Mac then go for it. Who am I to argue? Are you planning on buying the normal MBP or the Retina one?
  • paulj48paulj48 Posts: 1,122
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    chenks wrote: »
    still possible if you want to.
    plenty of tutorials that will guide you thru the process.

    Seen the tutorials, lots of people saying it doesnt work on 2012 MBP i5 and i7's they get the blue screen of death, it can be done via Parallels though.

    But come on your not going to spent £1500 on a Mac and then put on an 11 year old operating system.
  • chenkschenks Posts: 13,231
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    paulj48 wrote: »
    Seen the tutorials, lots of people saying it doesnt work on 2012 MBP i5 and i7's they get the blue screen of death, it can be done via Parallels though.

    But come on your not going to spent £1500 on a Mac and then put on an 11 year old operating system.

    funnily enough, i have XP but only in Vmware.
    i does what i need if i ever need to drop into windows (which is very rare).

    i'd say though that if windows is important then you're not gonna be buying a mac anyway (or shouldn't be).
  • paulj48paulj48 Posts: 1,122
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Funnily enough I also have XP running on Parallels on a 2011 MBP but only to run one program thats called Sporttracks that uses .net code (its a running/excercise logbook)

    I choose to use XP as I still have a valid license for it
  • soulboy77soulboy77 Posts: 24,396
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    secu wrote: »
    .. One minute I think the £1,500 is a solid investment. Then I think for £1,000 I could buy another laptop....
    I don't think 'investment' is the right word here! For £500 - £750 you can buy a pretty decent Windows laptop that will have enough oomph to do all that you require. If you go for an MacBook Pro you are deciding to pay a big premium for the Apple name and design.

    So be in no doubt, as you don't need it to run certain specialist apps, the real reason to go for a MacBook Pro is purely to have the qudos of owning one.
  • StigStig Posts: 12,446
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    soulboy77 wrote: »
    I don't think 'investment' is the right word here! For £500 - £750 you can buy a pretty decent Windows laptop that will have enough oomph to do all that you require. If you go for an MacBook Pro you are deciding to pay a big premium for the Apple name and design.

    So be in no doubt, as you don't need it to run certain specialist apps, the real reason to go for a MacBook Pro is purely to have the qudos of owning one.

    Technically, you expect an 'investment' to increase in value; a computer of any description will depreciate heavily.

    Dell do some very nice Ultrabooks which are almost as desirable as a MBP for a lot less money. There were some nice ones on Dell Outlet last week.
  • chenkschenks Posts: 13,231
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    soulboy77 wrote: »
    I don't think 'investment' is the right word here! For £500 - £750 you can buy a pretty decent Windows laptop that will have enough oomph to do all that you require. If you go for an MacBook Pro you are deciding to pay a big premium for the Apple name and design.

    So be in no doubt, as you don't need it to run certain specialist apps, the real reason to go for a MacBook Pro is purely to have the qudos of owning one.

    if you want to run logic then you then a mac of some sort.
    for music production it's pretty much close to industry standard.
    the OP did mention music production in the origina post.
  • mred2000mred2000 Posts: 10,050
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    soulboy77 wrote: »
    For £500 - £750 you can buy a pretty decent Windows laptop that will have enough oomph to do all that you require.

    You could probably knock the starting price down to £350-£400...
    chenks wrote: »
    ...the OP did mention music production in the original post.

    But not which package. I've played about with a few packages on both platforms in the past.
  • StigStig Posts: 12,446
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    chenks wrote: »
    if you want to run logic then you then a mac of some sort.
    for music production it's pretty much close to industry standard.
    the OP did mention music production in the origina post.

    What about Pro Tools? That runs on PC and Mac.
  • chenkschenks Posts: 13,231
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Stig wrote: »
    What about Pro Tools? That runs on PC and Mac.

    pro tools, yeah
    but walk into any studio or look on stage and it'll be macs and logic you'll see 9 times out of 10.
  • soulboy77soulboy77 Posts: 24,396
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    chenks wrote: »
    if you want to run logic then you then a mac of some sort.
    for music production it's pretty much close to industry standard.
    the OP did mention music production in the origina post.
    That's my point. The OP can justify the cost in terms of having the right tools for the jobs. Only he knows if he just wants to dabble in music production or is going to do it seriously and needs to run high end s/w.
  • cnbcwatchercnbcwatcher Posts: 56,681
    Forum Member
    chenks wrote: »
    i'd say though that if windows is important then you're not gonna be buying a mac anyway (or shouldn't be).

    I don't understand why people buy Macs to run Windows. It seems daft to me. The Apple Store guys would have a cow if you only ran Windows on your Mac and you took it to the Genius Bar to be fixed :D
Sign In or Register to comment.