Options

So why didnt Corrie fans support "Road to Corrie"?

CharnhamCharnham Posts: 61,548
Forum Member
✭✭
If BBC 4 had made a similar show about Doctor Who (I use Dotor Who as its an example of a TV show that I both watch and has as much history as Corrie does) I and im sure many more Doctor Who fans would have watched it.

On a night where Corrie aired to 7.1m, the Road to Corrie only aired to 851,700. That does not seem like alot to me.

I was predicting around 2 million viewers, but cleary I was way off, reviews ive seen have been postitive, and it seems Jessie Wallace turned in a fine preformance as Pat Phoniex, yet it aired to less than 1 million viewers?

Why didnt Corrie fans watch this show, as a Doctor Who fan, this is something I would love to see for Doctor Who, I dont see why Corrie fans would not enjoy this show. This should be a gift to Corrie fans, something for them to treasure, but apparntly not.
«1345

Comments

  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 42
    Forum Member
    800k+ is quite good for a programme on a specialist channel, although being on BBC Four probably didn't help the figures - I somehow can't imagine a lot of ITV1 viewers even knowing how to find BBC Four.

    I'd look for a repeat on BBC Two to do much better - possibly around the time of the 50th anniversary episodes of Coronation Street itself.
  • Options
    CharnhamCharnham Posts: 61,548
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    TheRealWB wrote: »
    800k+ is quite good for a programme on a specialist channel, although being on BBC Four probably didn't help the figures - I somehow can't imagine a lot of ITV1 viewers even knowing how to find BBC Four.
    im not the biggest watcher of BBC 4, but for Doctor Who I would and have done so.
  • Options
    foxlafoxla Posts: 1,255
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Road to Corrie was very good indeed, well acted and written, a few 'time' errors with types of phone etc, but a damn good drama.
    Haven't watched Corrie itself for years, but thought last nights history well worth watching, should have been on ITV tho!
    maybe could have done with being a tad longer though
  • Options
    Tony RichardsTony Richards Posts: 5,748
    Forum Member
    Charnham wrote: »
    Why didnt Corrie fans watch this show?

    Probably because Corrie fans don't watch much BBC and certainly not BBC4 - they may not have even known about it.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,965
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I watch Corrie and lots of stuff on the BBC, but hadn't even heard about it until I saw this thread.
  • Options
    derek500derek500 Posts: 24,892
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    It was a very busy slot on Thursday at 9pm. Our Sky+HD was occupied and we're recording the BBC HD repeat this evening.
  • Options
    GeorgeSGeorgeS Posts: 20,039
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    One point that anoraks always forget is that the inside workings of tv stations or programmes is not very interesting to the vast majority of the population.

    There are many shows that were set in tv or radio that flopped. Lie From Studio 54 being a good example. Quite a few others lasted such a short time that people cant even recall their names anymore.

    The only successful ones are shows like Frasier that dont really explore the media aspect and use the tv or radio station as an incidental work backdrop.
  • Options
    JELLIES0JELLIES0 Posts: 6,709
    Forum Member
    TheRealWB wrote: »
    800k+ is quite good for a programme on a specialist channel, although being on BBC Four probably didn't help the figures - I somehow can't imagine a lot of ITV1 viewers even knowing how to find BBC Four.

    Whaaaaaat. You cheeky wotsit ! :eek::eek: :D

    I watched it and thought it was pretty good. I've barely missed Corrie since we first had ITV in 1962. I was surprised at the poor reviews in the papers.
  • Options
    ftvftv Posts: 31,668
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    JELLIES0 wrote: »
    Whaaaaaat. You cheeky wotsit ! :eek::eek: :D

    I watched it and thought it was pretty good. I've barely missed Corrie since we first had ITV in 1962. I was surprised at the poor reviews in the papers.

    Don't forget not everyone can receive BBC4.
    I don't think the programme was particularly well promoted, didn't see any promos on BBC1 or 2.
    All the reviews (and previews) I read were very enthusiastic which is why I watched the programme myself.
    Surely the BBC could come to a deal with ITV plc to allow the programme to be shown on ITV1 around the anniversary as it clearly would be of interest to regular Corrie viewers.Ironic that this was an ITV Studios production.
    PS: Where did they get those old EMI cameras from, they actually seemed to be still working !
  • Options
    garyessexgaryessex Posts: 9,083
    Forum Member
    800K is a fantastic figure for BBC4
  • Options
    tom e1649tom e1649 Posts: 1,018
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    garyessex wrote: »
    800K is a fantastic figure for BBC4

    Yes it is, and viewing figures aren't everything, thankfully.
  • Options
    ftvftv Posts: 31,668
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    GeorgeS wrote: »
    One point that anoraks always forget is that the inside workings of tv stations or programmes is not very interesting to the vast majority of the population.

    There are many shows that were set in tv or radio that flopped. Lie From Studio 54 being a good example. Quite a few others lasted such a short time that people cant even recall their names anymore.

    The only successful ones are shows like Frasier that dont really explore the media aspect and use the tv or radio station as an incidental work backdrop.

    Broadcast News and Network were two very successful films set in TV stations
    Drop the Dead Donkey (C4) was set in a 24-hour news station
  • Options
    soupnazisoupnazi Posts: 1,134
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    GeorgeS wrote: »
    One point that anoraks always forget is that the inside workings of tv stations or programmes is not very interesting to the vast majority of the population.

    There are many shows that were set in tv or radio that flopped. Lie From Studio 54 being a good example. Quite a few others lasted such a short time that people cant even recall their names anymore.

    The only successful ones are shows like Frasier that dont really explore the media aspect and use the tv or radio station as an incidental work backdrop.

    Do you mean Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip? Your title is a mixture of a C5 show (LFSF) and a legendary 70s nightclub in New York (Studio 54)!!!!
  • Options
    GeorgeSGeorgeS Posts: 20,039
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    soupnazi wrote: »
    Do you mean Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip? Your title is a mixture of a C5 show (LFSF) and a legendary 70s nightclub in New York (Studio 54)!!!!

    I mean the one with all the West Wing stars in it. It didnt last long anyway.
  • Options
    mersey70mersey70 Posts: 5,049
    Forum Member
    foxla wrote: »
    Road to Corrie was very good indeed, well acted and written, a few 'time' errors with types of phone etc, but a damn good drama.
    Haven't watched Corrie itself for years, but thought last nights history well worth watching, should have been on ITV tho!
    maybe could have done with being a tad longer though

    The phones looked like 706 GPO models which were introduced in 1959 so were available at the time they were portraying, I only know this as I was recently looking for one to buy as a gift.

    I enjoyed the show, it's funny how little the Granada TV studios seem to have changed externally even now, the old red Granada TV signage on the building still shines proudly today
  • Options
    ftvftv Posts: 31,668
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The Bernsteins named their TV station after the city in Spain they used to holiday in. Good job they didn't go on holiday to Bognor Regis:D
  • Options
    SpotSpot Posts: 25,130
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    A better question might be why ITV is still able to make a quality drama such as this but is no longer able to find a slot for it on any of its own channels - even when the subject of the drama is its own flagship programme which is about to celebrate a very significant anniversary. What a sad commentary on the present state of this company.
  • Options
    Glenn AGlenn A Posts: 23,916
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Spot wrote: »
    A better question might be why ITV is still able to make a quality drama such as this but is no longer able to find a slot for it on any of its own channels - even when the subject of the drama is its own flagship programme which is about to celebrate a very significant anniversary. What a sad commentary on the present state of this company.

    Yes they were probably more interested in producing Jedward Let Loose, yet another completely forgettable reality show that lasted one run.
  • Options
    CharnhamCharnham Posts: 61,548
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    derek500 wrote: »
    It was a very busy slot on Thursday at 9pm. Our Sky+HD was occupied and we're recording the BBC HD repeat this evening.
    that is a fair point, and something I know from my own experince.
    GeorgeS wrote: »
    One point that anoraks always forget is that the inside workings of tv stations or programmes is not very interesting to the vast majority of the population.
    true enough, but shouldnt there be Corrie anoraks who would want to see it, and should there not be a few more than 800,000?
    GeorgeS wrote: »
    I mean the one with all the West Wing stars in it. It didnt last long anyway.
    Studio 60 from the Sunset Strip, it was a good show, that I enjoyed.

    Anyways 30 Rock is still on air in the states, even if it only airs on Comedy Central over here, that too is a good show set behind the scences of a TV show.

    As for airing this on ITV 1, I dont know if im happy with the idea that Licence Fee is going to ITV Studios, yet alone the idea that a show where licence fee money was spent, will air on any ITV channel, beyond the normal cycle as put in place by BBC WW.
  • Options
    CharnhamCharnham Posts: 61,548
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Spot wrote: »
    A better question might be why ITV is still able to make a quality drama such as this but is no longer able to find a slot for it on any of its own channels - even when the subject of the drama is its own flagship programme which is about to celebrate a very significant anniversary. What a sad commentary on the present state of this company.
    I agree
  • Options
    GeorgeSGeorgeS Posts: 20,039
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Charnham wrote: »
    As for airing this on ITV 1, I dont know if im happy with the idea that Licence Fee is going to ITV Studios, yet alone the idea that a show where licence fee money was spent, will air on any ITV channel, beyond the normal cycle as put in place by BBC WW.

    So you dont think any independent should produce any programminmg for the BBC or are you just uniquely anti-ITV studios?
  • Options
    floopy123floopy123 Posts: 6,003
    Forum Member
    Without wishing to be a smart arse or state the blooming obvious, wouldn't it have made sense to show it on ITV1 after the end of a Coronation Street episode? It would have got decent ratings.
  • Options
    derek500derek500 Posts: 24,892
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    GeorgeS wrote: »
    There are many shows that were set in tv or radio that flopped. Lie From Studio 54 being a good example. Quite a few others lasted such a short time that people cant even recall their names anymore.

    A couple of good US ones were Studio 5-B about a breakfast TV show, shown on BBC2 and WIOU about a local news programme shown on Sky One. Both were cancelled mid first season.
  • Options
    CharnhamCharnham Posts: 61,548
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    floopy123 wrote: »
    Without wishing to be a smart arse or state the blooming obvious, wouldn't it have made sense to show it on ITV1 after the end of a Coronation Street episode? It would have got decent ratings.
    I have to assume there was some point, where ITV could have said "you know what BBC, we like this, we will fund it ourselves, and air it on ITV, but thanks for the idea"
    GeorgeS wrote: »
    So you dont think any independent should produce any programminmg for the BBC or are you just uniquely anti-ITV studios?
    im not keen on the licecne fee becoming anybodys profits, but I also dont like the idea of it lining the pockets of ITV shareholders.

    Dont forget SportsNight, that was a good show, ok it didnt last long into its 2nd series, but it was still good.

    Moving Wallpaper, not excellent but better than ITVs ususal trash, whilst im looking forward to the BBC / Showtime (CBS) co-production, Episodes.

    I just hope it goes better than Matt Le Blancs ill fated "Joey", which also saw his character Joey, working on the sets of TV shows and movies.
  • Options
    burnesideburneside Posts: 2,951
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    mersey70 wrote: »
    The phones looked like 706 GPO models which were introduced in 1959 so were available at the time they were portraying, I only know this as I was recently looking for one to buy as a gift.

    The phones might have been authentic, but the ring tone certainly wasn't. They gave it a US style single ring, not the double ring used in this country.
Sign In or Register to comment.