Options

Number of Sexual Partners, and your Perception of What is Normal?

[Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 373
Forum Member
Me and my friends at uni were talking the other day about the amount of people we have been with, and I noticed that there was a large difference between all our numbers.
I assumed the average no. of sexual partners a woman would have in her lifetime was around 7, but they felt it was much higher; 15 perhaps.
I also realised they had been with more people than me.

Do you think your number of sexual partners changes your perception of what a "normal amount" is?

(Our "numbers" were 5, 6 and 10)
«13456789

Comments

  • Options
    ĐironaĐirona Posts: 15,881
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    why the sex obsession on this forum?
  • Options
    AzagothAzagoth Posts: 10,169
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    You lost me when you said "uni"!
  • Options
    CXC3000CXC3000 Posts: 10,258
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I don't think I could bear having a partner that had more than 2 encounters :(
  • Options
    ĐironaĐirona Posts: 15,881
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Azagoth wrote: »
    You lost me when you said "uni"!

    so it's true about the dumbing down then!
  • Options
    ĐironaĐirona Posts: 15,881
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    CXC3000 wrote: »
    I don't think I could bear having a partner that had more than 2 encounters :(

    why? and why 2? why not 1 or 3?
  • Options
    Red+BloodedRed+Blooded Posts: 4,676
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    CXC3000 wrote: »
    I don't think I could bear having a partner that had more than 2 encounters :(

    why?. :)
  • Options
    CXC3000CXC3000 Posts: 10,258
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Đirona wrote: »
    why? and why 2? why not 1 or 3?

    1 would be fine (any more than that and I'd feel all giddy).
    why?. :)

    It just wouldn't feel right.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 10,625
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    CXC3000 wrote: »
    I don't think I could bear having a partner that had more than 2 encounters :(

    How many have you had and how old are you?
  • Options
    ĐironaĐirona Posts: 15,881
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    CXC3000 wrote: »
    1 would be fine (any more than that and I'd feel all giddy).



    It just wouldn't feel right.

    because.....c'mon boyo, spit it out
  • Options
    Red+BloodedRed+Blooded Posts: 4,676
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    CXC3000 wrote: »
    1 would be fine (any more than that and I'd feel all giddy).



    It just wouldn't feel right.

    what if that person is in there 20's or even 30's.
  • Options
    ĐironaĐirona Posts: 15,881
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    elke21 wrote: »
    How many have you had and how old are you?

    yea, that's probably relevant
  • Options
    CXC3000CXC3000 Posts: 10,258
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    elke21 wrote: »
    How many have you had and how old are you?

    Sir/Madam, that's private.

    Thanking you.
    Đirona wrote: »
    because.....c'mon boyo, spit it out

    Er... you know how it is, D.
    what if that person is in there 20's or even 30's.

    Oh, man; that'd make it even worse :(
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 9,845
    Forum Member
    There is, imo, no right or wrong number, it's a very personal judgement, and i see no reason why it should even matter anyway. I, strange as i am, have a tendency to judge people based on what is between their ears conveyed through the mediums and speech and/or written word, not whom (singular and/or plural) has been between their legs.

    Apparently men are more likely to inflate their numbers as opposed to women who will reduce them. A rather sad proof of the existence of the stud/**** dichotomy.
  • Options
    RubusRooRubusRoo Posts: 10,262
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Both in our 40's and we have only ever had sex with each other.

    1 partner. Don't give a shit if that's "normal" or not. Good enough for swans. Raised 3 beautiful children & are still very much in love & lust.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 9,845
    Forum Member
    CXC3000 wrote: »
    1 would be fine (any more than that and I'd feel all giddy).

    Because of their greater sexual experience?
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 10,625
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    CXC3000 wrote: »
    Oh, man; that'd make it even worse :(
    So you expect a single man or woman in their 30's or older to have had just 1 or 2 sexual partners?
  • Options
    ĐironaĐirona Posts: 15,881
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Skolastyka wrote: »
    There is, imo, no right or wrong number, it's a very personal judgement, and i see no reason why it should even matter anyway. I, strange as i am, have a tendency to judge people based on what is between their ears conveyed through the medium and speech and/or written word, not whom (singular and/or plural) has been between their legs.

    Apparently men are more likely to inflate their numbers as opposed to women who will reduce them. A rather sad proof of the existence of the stud/**** dichotomy.

    many men are a lot more insecure about sex than many women, strange that!
  • Options
    CXC3000CXC3000 Posts: 10,258
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Skolastyka wrote: »
    Because of their greater sexual experience?

    Not at all.

    I guess it's because, you know, others have been 'at it'..
    elke21 wrote: »
    So you expect a single man or woman in their 30's or older to have had just 1 or 2 sexual partners?

    Absolutely.
  • Options
    ElanorElanor Posts: 13,326
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    But it depends on the person, and what their life's been like. Someone might marry their first partner and stay together for 30 years and have only one sexual partner - doesn't mean their morals or whatever are necessarily any different to someone who hasn't really settled down and has several relationships over the years.

    And a lifetime is a long time!
  • Options
    ĐironaĐirona Posts: 15,881
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    CXC3000 wrote: »

    Er... you know how it is, D.

    i do know how it is, i just don't know what you've settled on that particular number
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 373
    Forum Member
    Skolastyka wrote: »
    There is, imo, no right or wrong number, it's a very personal judgement, and i see no reason why it should even matter anyway. I, strange as i am, have a tendency to judge people based on what is between their ears conveyed through the medium and speech and/or written word, not whom (singular and/or plural) has been between their legs.

    Apparently men are more likely to inflate their numbers as opposed to women who will reduce them. A rather sad proof of the existence of the stud/**** dichotomy.

    I agree there is no "right or wrong" answer. I was just thinking however, that people who have had fewer sexual partners, may guess that the "average number of sexual partners" is lower than that of people who are more experienced.

    That's not to say "the average" is a good/bad thing, I was just thinking about people's perceptions. However, rightly or wrongly, I am sure most women may be wary of a man like Russell Brand who has allegedly slept with hundreds of women.
  • Options
    AzagothAzagoth Posts: 10,169
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    CXC, you're getting stranger and stranger by the day.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 3,106
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    When they say the average is 10, 15 or whatever, it could be that most people only have <5 partners but the average is bought right up by people who sleep with hundreds or thousands of others.
  • Options
    CXC3000CXC3000 Posts: 10,258
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Elanor wrote: »
    But it depends on the person, and what their life's been like. Someone might marry their first partner and stay together for 30 years and have only one sexual partner - doesn't mean their morals or whatever are necessarily any different to someone who hasn't really settled down and has several relationships over the years.

    It would explain what kind of psyche that person has; I mean, they've gone through about 10 different people, yet can't find the right one ?

    Hmm... something not right there.
  • Options
    CXC3000CXC3000 Posts: 10,258
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Azagoth wrote: »
    CXC, you're getting stranger and stranger by the day.

    Thanks, man.
Sign In or Register to comment.