Nope I wouldn't consider paying someone to have sex with me. And I hope I'd never have to! :D
More common than you'd think. If you look around. Also it's generally a bit of a myth only ugly people use them. lol A lot of people do appear to think that.
But ultimately old fashion ways of finding sex are definitely the best. Most people want sex with some connection going on , I know I do.
I've never seen an escort, and I've never been to a strip club, but for different reasons.
I don't understand strip clubs. It boggles my mind that anyone would want to pay a shitload of money to get sexually excited without a payoff. It seems bizarre and borderline masochistic. I don't condemn those who go to strip clubs and I wish them joy in their hobby, but I can't relate to it any more than I can relate to people who get their rocks off by asphyxiating themselves while wearing underpants stuffed with nettles.
On the other hand, I totally get why people visit escorts (aside from the obvious reason of not getting sex via any other route). There's the simple novelty of sex with a new partner; the possibility of experiencing "services" which aren't available at home; the fact that it's a purely self-centred act in which the customer's satisfaction is the sole object; and finally the fact that it's a bit sordid and grubby is surely titillating for a lot of people who enjoy grubby and sordid (don't try to tell me these people don't exist in droves; I've been on the internet).
So yeah, I totally get the attractions. I haven't done it because the consequences outweigh the benefits for me in all sorts of areas (not least the guilt I'd feel) but clearly plenty of men feel differently.
Now you can Hire Sex Doll in London. Hire Sex Doll – Siumi Le Chic for one hour, a couple of hours, dinner date including overnight, and even longer stays, as well as weeks or a month.
Now you can Hire Sex Doll in London. Hire Sex Doll – Siumi Le Chic for one hour, a couple of hours, dinner date including overnight, and even longer stays, as well as weeks or a month.
A 'dinner date' with your expensive love doll. Just imagine the other customers in the restaurant thinking "Rude bitch. Doesn't smile, hasn't eaten a bean all night and not said a word to that poor fellow hiding behind napkins every time I look.."
Some woman approached me few years ago prozzie recruiting - I obviously looked rougher than I thought.
Don't buy into letting you think that about yourself and appearance. The real stoners who would have been doing that, probably went on to ask a lamp post next. At that level they usually are too far gone to distinguish anything bar the screaming urge for a loaded needle with the poison of their undoing sadly.
So what's the difference between an escort and a prostitute. ??
Not much really, but escorts usually work from their premises and will do out-call. A prostitute might meet you in the street and it's a back alley job. There aren't many prostitutes standing on street corners these days. It's easier and safer to go online and work from a premises.
No, not for me. I wouldn't be interested in meaningless sex and certainly wouldn't pay for the privilege.
Yes, but you're a woman, presumably. You can get sex any time you like, if you want, if you're reasonably good looking. It's different for men.
That's why there are very few women that want or need to use escorts. All they've got to do is go up to a man they like and say 'fancy going back to my place' and most single men (and some in relationships) would say yes. However, if the average man went up to a women and said the same, most women unless they are out for a one night stand, would say 'get the **** out of here'.
It's not a level playing field while men are expected to put in the groundwork in most cases.
No I wouldn't lower myself. I'd only sleep with someone who actually wanted to sleep with me.
They may equally be somebody who sleeps around big time. The difference being is instead of paying her money up front, you've had to wine and dine them.
I would consider it, but I have no idea of the cost, probably way out of my price for those not hooked on drugs.
Well you could Google it. Around here, it's usually £100 for an hour of companionship and with her consent, it's down to you what you do with that time. In London you could be paying up to £500 an hour. If you want less time it'll cost you less.
In London you could easily spend £100 for a night out with a woman and no guarantee of anything afterwards. However, it may be the start of a long term relationship.
People that use escorts aren't generally looking for long time girlfriends (too much hassle for example) for obvious reasons. So, it all boils down to what you want.
They may equally be somebody who sleeps around big time. The difference being is instead of paying her money up front, you've had to wine and dine them.
Socialising with someone (where sex may happen) is not the same as making a business proposition with a prostitute
I've never seen an escort, and I've never been to a strip club, but for different reasons.
I don't understand strip clubs. It boggles my mind that anyone would want to pay a shitload of money to get sexually excited without a payoff. It seems bizarre and borderline masochistic. I don't condemn those who go to strip clubs and I wish them joy in their hobby, but I can't relate to it any more than I can relate to people who get their rocks off by asphyxiating themselves while wearing underpants stuffed with nettles.
It's not a hobby. Just a bit of entertainment. Same for some women who go to see male strippers.
Yes, but you're a woman, presumably. You can get sex any time you like, if you want, if you're reasonably good looking. It's different for men.
That's why there are very few women that want or need to use escorts. All they've got to do is go up to a man they like and say 'fancy going back to my place' and most single men (and some in relationships) would say yes. However, if the average man went up to a women and said the same, most women unless they are out for a one night stand, would say 'get the **** out of here'.
It's not a level playing field while men are expected to put in the groundwork in most cases.
That doesn't make much sense. If women are getting sex, they're presumably getting it from men, therefore men are getting sex too.
They may equally be somebody who sleeps around big time. The difference being is instead of paying her money up front, you've had to wine and dine them.
Yes, but you're a woman, presumably. You can get sex any time you like, if you want, if you're reasonably good looking. It's different for men.
That's why there are very few women that want or need to use escorts. All they've got to do is go up to a man they like and say 'fancy going back to my place' and most single men (and some in relationships) would say yes. However, if the average man went up to a women and said the same, most women unless they are out for a one night stand, would say 'get the **** out of here'.
It's not a level playing field while men are expected to put in the groundwork in most cases.
Yes, I would say I'm reasonably good looking but I still wouldn't go up to a man and ask him if he wanted to go back to my place. The sex would still be meaningless and although I enjoy sex with my partner I don't think I'd ever be desperate for it. For me it has to be part of a loving relationship. Sorry if that sounds old-fashioned bit that's just the way it is for me. After my first marriage I was on my own for some time and I never had a one night stand.
You know I have a problem with you and your attitude to women and sex so I won't go off at a tangent, but I still hate it that you equate sex with money. Sex does not have to follow an evening of wining and dining. Anyway, what if she invites you round for a meal and you end up sleeping together - do you consider that she is paying you for sex? What's wrong with a romantic walk in the park? If a woman really likes you she won't expect you to shell out money before she sleeps with you.
They may equally be somebody who sleeps around big time. The difference being is instead of paying her money up front, you've had to wine and dine them.
And I always thought couples went out for a meal because they enjoy the food and each other's company.
Comments
But ultimately old fashion ways of finding sex are definitely the best. Most people want sex with some connection going on , I know I do.
The debate has been decent though.
.......
I don't understand strip clubs. It boggles my mind that anyone would want to pay a shitload of money to get sexually excited without a payoff. It seems bizarre and borderline masochistic. I don't condemn those who go to strip clubs and I wish them joy in their hobby, but I can't relate to it any more than I can relate to people who get their rocks off by asphyxiating themselves while wearing underpants stuffed with nettles.
On the other hand, I totally get why people visit escorts (aside from the obvious reason of not getting sex via any other route). There's the simple novelty of sex with a new partner; the possibility of experiencing "services" which aren't available at home; the fact that it's a purely self-centred act in which the customer's satisfaction is the sole object; and finally the fact that it's a bit sordid and grubby is surely titillating for a lot of people who enjoy grubby and sordid (don't try to tell me these people don't exist in droves; I've been on the internet).
So yeah, I totally get the attractions. I haven't done it because the consequences outweigh the benefits for me in all sorts of areas (not least the guilt I'd feel) but clearly plenty of men feel differently.
could you a-Ford to anyway?
And someone offered me money for sex once.
Some woman approached me few years ago prozzie recruiting
Haha from that link
A 'dinner date' with your expensive love doll. Just imagine the other customers in the restaurant thinking "Rude bitch. Doesn't smile, hasn't eaten a bean all night and not said a word to that poor fellow hiding behind napkins every time I look.."
Don't buy into letting you think that about yourself and appearance. The real stoners who would have been doing that, probably went on to ask a lamp post next. At that level they usually are too far gone to distinguish anything bar the screaming urge for a loaded needle with the poison of their undoing sadly.
Not much really, but escorts usually work from their premises and will do out-call. A prostitute might meet you in the street and it's a back alley job. There aren't many prostitutes standing on street corners these days. It's easier and safer to go online and work from a premises.
Yes, but you're a woman, presumably. You can get sex any time you like, if you want, if you're reasonably good looking. It's different for men.
That's why there are very few women that want or need to use escorts. All they've got to do is go up to a man they like and say 'fancy going back to my place' and most single men (and some in relationships) would say yes. However, if the average man went up to a women and said the same, most women unless they are out for a one night stand, would say 'get the **** out of here'.
It's not a level playing field while men are expected to put in the groundwork in most cases.
They may equally be somebody who sleeps around big time. The difference being is instead of paying her money up front, you've had to wine and dine them.
Well you could Google it. Around here, it's usually £100 for an hour of companionship and with her consent, it's down to you what you do with that time. In London you could be paying up to £500 an hour. If you want less time it'll cost you less.
In London you could easily spend £100 for a night out with a woman and no guarantee of anything afterwards. However, it may be the start of a long term relationship.
People that use escorts aren't generally looking for long time girlfriends (too much hassle for example) for obvious reasons. So, it all boils down to what you want.
Socialising with someone (where sex may happen) is not the same as making a business proposition with a prostitute
It's not always about sex.
In your opinion, not mine. It's not always about sex, necessarily.
For instance. You could hire an escort to give you a normal massage for 30 minutes. No sex involved.
It's not a hobby. Just a bit of entertainment. Same for some women who go to see male strippers.
You do realise some women pay their own way?
Yes, I would say I'm reasonably good looking but I still wouldn't go up to a man and ask him if he wanted to go back to my place. The sex would still be meaningless and although I enjoy sex with my partner I don't think I'd ever be desperate for it. For me it has to be part of a loving relationship. Sorry if that sounds old-fashioned bit that's just the way it is for me. After my first marriage I was on my own for some time and I never had a one night stand.
You know I have a problem with you and your attitude to women and sex so I won't go off at a tangent, but I still hate it that you equate sex with money. Sex does not have to follow an evening of wining and dining. Anyway, what if she invites you round for a meal and you end up sleeping together - do you consider that she is paying you for sex? What's wrong with a romantic walk in the park? If a woman really likes you she won't expect you to shell out money before she sleeps with you.
And I always thought couples went out for a meal because they enjoy the food and each other's company.