Thor: The Dark World (2013)

12346»

Comments

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 4,129
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Really good fun film. The atmospherics and Wagnerian feel were done superbly. Action was good and the right level of knowingness and humour.

    Wasn't bothered about Charing Cross to Greenwich in 3 stops - one presumes the makers needed to use a station name that would resonate moer with non-Brits. And it really was just a throw away gag to get Thor using the London underground.

    Oh and:

    TA DA!
  • brbbrb Posts: 27,559
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I am a fan of the Chinese promotional poster. Maybe Thor 3.
  • Blossom85Blossom85 Posts: 1,714
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    brb wrote: »
    I am a fan of the Chinese promotional poster. Maybe Thor 3.

    Yeah, forget Jane Foster. Thor and Loki are the real love story.

    :D
  • CBFreakCBFreak Posts: 28,602
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Going to see this tomorrow. :D
  • PJ68PJ68 Posts: 3,116
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    ASIFZED wrote: »
    Just seen this. Awful. Wondering if I saw the same film everyone else did?

    Too LOTR-like, ponderous, slow, disjointed, didn't enjoy constantly flitting between worlds. London elements looked cheap and embarrassing. Yet another 'prison break' scene. Jeez. I'd read there was an abundance of humour / funny quips. Only the fan girls in the audience seemed to enjoy the 'jokes'. Bored of Loki and robbed of a real development to the character. Cheap.

    Natalie Portman seemed bored, the loss of one character was 'meh' and Kat Denning's Darcy was an annoyance. The less said about nutjob Selvig, the better.

    Never considered Thor 1 a masterpiece, but still far superior to the sequel. Surprised it was only 110 mins-ish. Felt like 3 hrs long. As for the Walter Mitty 10 minute promo. Wtf?!

    Rating. 2/5.

    i totally agree with you, thought it was awful. and i loved the first film.

    i think natalie portman was forced into doing this - both she and anthony hopkins looked embarrassed.

    the 'comedy' (selvieg, kat dennings and her intern) was witless in the extreme.

    everything in it seemed like an afterthought
  • circlebro2019circlebro2019 Posts: 17,560
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    doing well at box office, roll on thor 3
  • lola_skyelola_skye Posts: 21,328
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I wanted to slap Loki by the end of it and not because he's a baddie. As usual he's an irritant. Can't see the appeal in him. Can't wait for avengers 2 - Loki free
  • GoatyGoaty Posts: 7,776
    Forum Member
    Wow, just saw subtitled version of it at Cinema, so enjoy it so much!

    Love the opening with battle! What a battle!

    I like that this film is not Superhero film, but Sci-fi war film!

    Sorry if anyone mention it, but it nice to see Korg (of Planet Hulk) lookalike.

    http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/0/77/167498-160637-korg.jpg

    Loki was sooo great in it! Love his lines, and calm when
    fights at the cells
    and his
    Captain America
    .
    Thor on the tubes was so funny! Remind me of Spider-man 2.

    Nice to see Heimdall did the little action!
  • Johnny ClayJohnny Clay Posts: 5,326
    Forum Member
    whedon247 wrote: »
    doing well at box office, roll on thor 3
    I imagine Thor 3 is probably a given if it hasn't already been announced.

    $327m worldwide on its second Int./first US weekend is great business. $600m looks certain so it's a question of how much beyond that it can draw (boxofficemojo.com)

    Will Thor hammer Man of Steel ($663m)?
  • YuffieYuffie Posts: 9,864
    Forum Member
    Will Thor hammer Man of Steel ($663m)?


    Really ??

    :D
  • Johnny ClayJohnny Clay Posts: 5,326
    Forum Member
    ^ Yes, really. Some people (myself included) thought MoS would do a fair bit better than that.
  • spursgaleaspursgalea Posts: 1,193
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I imagine Thor 3 is probably a given if it hasn't already been announced.

    $327m worldwide on its second Int./first US weekend is great business. $600m looks certain so it's a question of how much beyond that it can draw (boxofficemojo.com)

    Will Thor hammer Man of Steel ($663m)?

    I hope there is Thor 3 with the ending of thor 2. I went to see what Happens with
    how loki as thor dad plays out
  • circlebro2019circlebro2019 Posts: 17,560
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I imagine Thor 3 is probably a given if it hasn't already been announced.

    $327m worldwide on its second Int./first US weekend is great business. $600m looks certain so it's a question of how much beyond that it can draw (boxofficemojo.com)

    Will Thor hammer Man of Steel ($663m)?

    wow i would be shocked

    i know MoS didnt do super huge numbers(still did damn well) but hes superman! everyone knows him,not everyone knows thor

    i would be surprised but i wouldn't mind, i loved both films.
  • Residents FanResidents Fan Posts: 9,204
    Forum Member
    A great film! Hemsworth was good, I loved the Heimdall action, the cast were all great (except Hopkins (by-the-numbers) and Eccleston (routine)). The director really made
    the action scenes engaging. Also
    Poor Freya. That was sad. :(

    The post-credit trailer was interesting :
    Who is this "Collector" and what are
    his plans for the Infinity Stones?
  • Syntax ErrorSyntax Error Posts: 27,784
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Really good film IMO.

    A worthy addition to the Marvel family.

    I also thought Stan Lee's cameo was the best on yet!!:D
  • Syntax ErrorSyntax Error Posts: 27,784
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    alfster wrote: »
    Really good fun film. The atmospherics and Wagnerian feel were done superbly. Action was good and the right level of knowingness and humour.

    Wasn't bothered about Charing Cross to Greenwich in 3 stops - one presumes the makers needed to use a station name that would resonate moer with non-Brits. And it really was just a throw away gag to get Thor using the London underground.

    Oh and:

    TA DA!

    I sincerely hope that Thor paid the correct fare!!:D
  • IWasBoredIWasBored Posts: 3,418
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I like the 1999 Avengers movie with Ralph Fiennes and Eddie Izzard
  • eggshelleggshell Posts: 4,416
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Saw this today and thoroughly enjoyed the LOTR v Star Wars bonkersness !!

    Chris Hemsworth and Tom Hiddleston bounce off each other superbly.

    Not keen on the human side if the equation but could watch all the Asgardians all day long.

    Liked also that Asgard looked more real.

    Rollicking good fun...and I thought it slightly better than the first Thor and miles better than that other bloke with a red capes last two films.
  • JasonJason Posts: 76,557
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    ASIFZED wrote: »
    Just seen this. Awful. Wondering if I saw the same film everyone else did?

    funny thing is, a mate of mine rang me at the weekend to say that he watch this and found it utterly abysmal - the worst film he's seen this year and even worse than Iron Man 3 (which we both hated).

    I obviously had to go and see it to see if was really that bad and watched it yesterday. I enjoyed it, so i'm certainly going to attempt to find out why my friend hated it so much.
  • circlebro2019circlebro2019 Posts: 17,560
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    funny thing is, a mate of mine rang me at the weekend to say that he watch this and found it utterly abysmal - the worst film he's seen this year and even worse than Iron Man 3 (which we both hated).

    I obviously had to go and see it to see if was really that bad and watched it yesterday. I enjoyed it, so i'm certainly going to attempt to find out why my friend hated it so much.

    jealous of hemsworths biceps? lol
  • JasonJason Posts: 76,557
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    whedon247 wrote: »
    jealous of hemsworths biceps? lol

    no, that was me :D
  • circlebro2019circlebro2019 Posts: 17,560
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    no, that was me :D

    i stopped being jealous and just started admiring.....................lol
Sign In or Register to comment.