My theory is a bit out the box, but bear with me: could Jane have killed her mother?
At the start she seemed quite jealous that she was about to have a brother (kept referring to "our place") etc. so she might have pushed her mother onto the rocks in jealousy, which went too far?
The whole mysterious man with a rock could have just been something she made up as a child but has come to believe as the truth as she's grown up with the guilt?
I know there's a lot of holes in this but something along those lines perhaps??
My theory is a bit out the box, but bear with me: could Jane have killed her mother?
At the start she seemed quite jealous that she was about to have a brother (kept referring to "our place") etc. so she might have pushed her mother onto the rocks in jealousy, which went too far?
The whole mysterious man with a rock could have just been something she made up as a child but has come to believe as the truth as she's grown up with the guilt?
I know there's a lot of holes in this but something along those lines perhaps??
Im glad there are only 2 episodes. I couldn't last out for 6 like they usually have. It has been said that there are twists so your ideas could hold water.
Ooh now you might be on to something there. Very TV drama-ish. I'm fairly sure I watched a drama recently with a twist in a similar vein. Can't for the life of me think what it was.
Her depression and mental health problems might not be due to her mum's murder, but by her blocking out what she had done.
Yep, you may be right :cool: but I hope you're not because you've spoiled the ending for me now.
And maybe the husbands a bit off because she's said something when drunk/asleep?
Im glad there are only 2 episodes. I couldn't last out for 6 like they usually have. It has been said that there are twists so your ideas could hold water.
Better than broad church, I almost died of boredom
And maybe the husbands a bit off because she's said something when drunk/asleep?
This is what I've not figured out yet, if my theory turns out to be true I'm not sure how Janes blood would end up mixed in, or how she'd end up bleeding at all in fact.
I didn't actually notice that the husband was off at all but a few people seem to have picked up on it- I think he's just concerned for their child and worried by the fact she seems to have gone into a downward spiral from the accusation (and not for the first time it seems). It seems unlikely he would be connected unless he knew her when she was 7 years old
I think maybe it's the Dad. She falsely accused two innocent men in the past, has had mental health problems, maybe she blocked out of her mind that it was the Dad and randomly accuses other men now and then to keep trying to fool herself. It's like the man stood over the girl, debating whether to off her, decided he couldn't kill his own daughter and ran off. Although not sure how that would all pan out if the daughter had just said to the Police "Daddy killed Mummy".
I think maybe it's the Dad. She falsely accused two innocent men in the past, has had mental health problems, maybe she blocked out of her mind that it was the Dad and randomly accuses other men now and then to keep trying to fool herself. It's like the man stood over the girl, debating whether to off her, decided he couldn't kill his own daughter and ran off. Although not sure how that would all pan out if the daughter had just said to the Police "Daddy killed Mummy".
The Dad's definitely a possibility. There was something about the look he gave when she was telling them about the man she'd seen which immediately made me think "It was him!", he seemed awfully quiet and looked quite shifty.
Oh I just made a post about this, as didn't see there was already one. I really enjoyed it, but annoying it's in 2 parts. Is the next part on next week?
I thought the man she accused had done it, but says his blood didn't match.
If you met Peter Firth once 23 years ago you would never recognise him today. In fact it took me minute to tell it was the same chap who was in Spooks.
The fact that the plot called for a blood test, rather than a simple DNA swab, must mean that there is something dodgy about the blood sample.
I watched again online and points I noticed are the killer knew her mother's name. They showed the killer's wedding ring, and then when she saw her father they showed his wedding ring. She accused the Dr after the her Dr warned her to not stop taking the anti depressants at once.
Can't really call where it's gonna go but I think she will have been right and it was him, but he keeps making calls to friends in high places to keep him free. The false vein idea from the true story is freaky but possible and links with him being in the medical profession; alternatively some sort of fake result/coverup at a police level perhaps? But Jane will pull through (despite seeming increasingly cray) - or perhaps she'll never prove it, then at the end she'll be killed at the same place ... by the doctor.
The guy who made this also did A Mother's Son with Hermione Norris which was very good.
There was a true story in LA - a woman who visited out patients woke up in her bed and had memory of being raped- by a doctor. But she couldn't move.
She was poor and the good Dr had seen her at a reduced rate charge.
He then said that she was a known prostitute and slept around. And was only after compensation!
It was this girls poor standing in the community accusing the very popular Dr. NO one would believe her. They took a vaginal swab and had the DNA of the last person to have sex with her.
The Dr let a Dr take his blood for DNA - the results came back that it wasn't his DNA in her.
All well and good, till the Dr who took the blood from the accused decided he wanted to do another blood test. So accused Dr came in and held out his arm. It was then the Dr realised that the accused Dr had inserted a long medical vain into his arm - the vain that would be used fior the blood test. The fake vien was filled with someone elses blood.
So they took blood from accused Drs other arm 0- and it matched the sperm DNA.
The Dr thought no one would believe her against him, and when they wanted a blood test he simple put a vain of different blood into his ar.
He almost got away with it!
I read that story a few years ago too and I'm wondering if the writer may have pinched the idea!. Here's a link of the story if anyone wants to read about it.
Did anyone notice he called his daughter the morning before going to the station because he had something to tell her I wonder what that was?
I think he called her after he looked up pictures of Jane, so was probably telling her he recognised her from a previous meeting. Not completely sure though.
The whole thing had a bit of a "samey" feel about it, like we've seen it all before. Loony accuser, no one believes her then it turns out she was right.
I hope the doctor guy didn't do it. Then it would just be too predictable.
I think he called her after he looked up pictures of Jane, so was probably telling her he recognised her from a previous meeting. Not completely sure though.
His daughter was also acting as his lawyer, and they obviously had time to get the CCTV footage from the hospital. That is what it may have been about.
Comments
I thought that as well!
Oh I LIKE this
So the blood could be daughters?
And her Hubby's a bit shifty
And maybe the husbands a bit off because she's said something when drunk/asleep?
Better than broad church, I almost died of boredom
That's exactly what I'm thinking- and I kind of hope in a way I'm wrong too so I can be surprised next week!
This is what I've not figured out yet, if my theory turns out to be true I'm not sure how Janes blood would end up mixed in, or how she'd end up bleeding at all in fact.
I didn't actually notice that the husband was off at all but a few people seem to have picked up on it- I think he's just concerned for their child and worried by the fact she seems to have gone into a downward spiral from the accusation (and not for the first time it seems). It seems unlikely he would be connected unless he knew her when she was 7 years old
She was in Heartbeat at teatime with a bad lad boyfriend called Jamie and being bought a drink in the Aidensfield Arms by some character called Lefty.
ll.She was in Inspector Banks the other week as well.
The Dad's definitely a possibility. There was something about the look he gave when she was telling them about the man she'd seen which immediately made me think "It was him!", he seemed awfully quiet and looked quite shifty.
adopted at birth?
I thought the man she accused had done it, but says his blood didn't match.
The fact that the plot called for a blood test, rather than a simple DNA swab, must mean that there is something dodgy about the blood sample.
Thinking along those lines myself
Wouldn't the daughter's DNA be similar to her Mother's though? How do they know that the tested it against the right sample of blood?
I enjoyed it and like the theories here. Also glad it's only two episodes!
Can't really call where it's gonna go but I think she will have been right and it was him, but he keeps making calls to friends in high places to keep him free. The false vein idea from the true story is freaky but possible and links with him being in the medical profession; alternatively some sort of fake result/coverup at a police level perhaps? But Jane will pull through (despite seeming increasingly cray) - or perhaps she'll never prove it, then at the end she'll be killed at the same place ... by the doctor.
The guy who made this also did A Mother's Son with Hermione Norris which was very good.
I read that story a few years ago too and I'm wondering if the writer may have pinched the idea!. Here's a link of the story if anyone wants to read about it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Schneeberger
I hope the doctor guy didn't do it. Then it would just be too predictable.
Press release for next weeks episode looks like things really hot up .