Princess Beatrice - embarrassment

Leicester_HunkLeicester_Hunk Posts: 18,316
Forum Member
✭✭
This lazy girl does nothing but go on holiday all the time. She is worse than Coleen Rooney !!!!

And holiday from what, exactly, when she doesn't work? Mucking about on Air Miles Andy's website doesn't actually count as work. It's obvious where she gets her work ethic from eh Andy?!

The Queen needs to sort this out, letting her freeload like this. Given her love of jetting off, why doesn't she do something useful like get out to third world countries and do something decent instead of buggering off to the Bahamas, pi$$ing off to Portugal or frigging off to France all the time?

She is a complete waste of space I think. She has as much point to her as the low lifes on celebrity chav shows.

She is really making me climb my soapbox today.
«1345678

Comments

  • DiamondDollDiamondDoll Posts: 21,460
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Simply cannot stand her.>:(

    She learned well from her disgusting, professional freeloading, parents.

    I've often wondered if she is actually 'all there'.
  • GracieLGracieL Posts: 4,311
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    She's awful, she hasn't had a job since she left Sony in January. She never does any royal engagements either, constantly lying on a beach in St Barts or skiing in Veriber. Mind you with parent's like her's, it's no surprise.

    At least Eugenie has a job.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 10,488
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    She certainly is a chip off the old block. I'm no royalist but credit to Harry. It might be considered privilege and not really work but he does spread a lot of good will and raises awareness of problems in Africa.
  • DiamondDollDiamondDoll Posts: 21,460
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I will be totally gobsmacked if any poster comes along and defends this clown. :o
  • zx50zx50 Posts: 91,270
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    As far as I know, Prince Andrew has a playboy lifestyle. It seems they're similar. The Conservatives have declared war on people on non-working benefits and yet here we have royalty that might be having holidays and everything that's probably being paid for with people's taxes.
  • HotgossipHotgossip Posts: 22,385
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I will be totally gobsmacked if any poster comes along and defends this clown. :o

    I'm sure somebody will come along who worships the ground all these royal spongers walk on. Don't you know people flock from all over the world just to see the royals? :D They don't come here to look at our old buildings, beautiful scenery or fabulous coastlines ..... Just the royals apparently. :D
  • 2shy20072shy2007 Posts: 52,579
    Forum Member
    She is part of a larger problem, the Royals need to be trimmed down drastically, cut off all of the stragglers and have just the Queen and Prince, the rest should fend for themselves and not receive one penny from us.

    Thier homes and properties could be claimed back and used to raise monies by opening them all up to the public and selling off the lesser ones.
  • evie71evie71 Posts: 1,372
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    This lazy girl does nothing but go on holiday all the time. She is worse than Coleen Rooney !!!!

    And holiday from what, exactly, when she doesn't work? Mucking about on Air Miles Andy's website doesn't actually count as work. It's obvious where she gets her work ethic from eh Andy?!

    The Queen needs to sort this out, letting her freeload like this. Given her love of jetting off, why doesn't she do something useful like get out to third world countries and do something decent instead of buggering off to the Bahamas, pi$$ing off to Portugal or frigging off to France all the time?

    She is a complete waste of space I think. She has as much point to her as the low lifes on celebrity chav shows.

    She is really making me climb my soapbox today.


    I'm usually quite indifferent to the royals but there is something about this lazy, ugly, gormless looking oath that I really can't stand. She really is a complete waste of oxygen, the same goes for her sponging, greedy parents>:( She also takes a really horrible picture, ugly f....! Gosh I dislike her more than I thought I did:D
  • DiamondDollDiamondDoll Posts: 21,460
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Hotgossip wrote: »
    I'm sure somebody will come along who worships the ground all these royal spongers walk on. Don't you know people flock from all over the world just to see the royals? :D They don't come here to look at our old buildings, beautiful scenery or fabulous coastlines ..... Just the royals apparently. :D

    I have no problems with the immediate Royal Family i.e The Monarch and his/her consort and I'll even go so far as the Monarch's off-spring but that is it.

    Cannot abide Prince Andrew, Prince Edward is fine and I feel both Prince Charles and the Princess Royal are both hard-working with their hearts in the right place.

    As far as the rest of them go.........>:(

    The subject of this thread who does zilch, and all the other freeloaders, are accompanied everywhere by private detectives.

    Q. Who pays for their security?
    A. Every tax payer in this country.

    It really angers me. >:(
  • viva.espanaviva.espana Posts: 8,500
    Forum Member
    evie71 wrote: »
    I'm usually quite indifferent to the royals but there is something about this lazy, ugly, gormless looking oath that I really can't stand. She really is a complete waste of oxygen, the same goes for her sponging, greedy parents>:( She also takes a really horrible picture, ugly f....! Gosh I dislike her more than I thought I did:D

    Can you not just dislike her for being the lazy, entitled, directionless woman she is without resorting to such nasty personal comments about her looks?
  • Leicester_HunkLeicester_Hunk Posts: 18,316
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Q. Who pays for their security?
    A. Every tax payer in this country.

    It really angers me. >:(

    It does me too and I am getting off my arse and going to work to pay for this as much as I am paying for the "chavs".
  • DiamondDollDiamondDoll Posts: 21,460
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    It does me too and I am getting off my arse and going to work to pay for this as much as I am paying for the "chavs".

    I hear you but just to make it clear, I don't mind the immediate family having protection.

    As far as all the others go........let their parents pay for it.
    The Princess Royal is much to be admired for her stance in all of this. :)
  • HotgossipHotgossip Posts: 22,385
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    evie71 wrote: »
    I'm usually quite indifferent to the royals but there is something about this lazy, ugly, gormless looking oath that I really can't stand. She really is a complete waste of oxygen, the same goes for her sponging, greedy parents>:( She also takes a really horrible picture, ugly f....! Gosh I dislike her more than I thought I did:D

    Stop mincing your words !!:D:D:D
  • The PrumeisterThe Prumeister Posts: 22,398
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The Queen and Princess Anne are the only 2 I have any time for. The rest of them are a bunch of over privileged, pampered parasites. If I'd been alive 600 years ago, I would've been beheaded for treason.

    Airmiles Andy is one of the most atrocious, sleazy, creepy, wastes of oxygen in the entire universe, ditto his ex wife, and by default I'm afraid, his ghastly, over entitled daughters, but in particular, Beatrice. She has exactly the same purpose in life as someone like Paris Hilton; although, to be fair to Hilton, at least she has made her own money and not just lived off her parents.

    If she had any ounce of savvy, she would quit the endless holidays and do some public charity work - it might well be a token gesture - but at least it might help change public perception.She is, apparently, patron of a dyslexia charity, but it would appear in name only as she appears to do absolutely diddly squat in terms of fundraising or awareness. It's not her fault that she was born into such privilege, but she could have the power to change things if she wanted.
  • HotgossipHotgossip Posts: 22,385
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I have no problems with the immediate Royal Family i.e The Monarch and his/her consort and I'll even go so far as the Monarch's off-spring but that is it.

    Cannot abide Prince Andrew, Prince Edward is fine and I feel both Prince Charles and the Princess Royal are both hard-working with their hearts in the right place.

    As far as the rest of them go.........>:(

    The subject of this thread who does zilch, and all the other freeloaders, are accompanied everywhere by private detectives.

    Q. Who pays for their security?
    A. Every tax payer in this country.

    It really angers me. >:(

    Prince Edward is "fine":confused::confused: He's a clown prince, a comedy act, a waste of space. Why the hell he needs security and bodyguards to go on a shopping trip is beyond me.
  • HotgossipHotgossip Posts: 22,385
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The Queen and Princess Anne are the only 2 I have any time for. The rest of them are a bunch of over privileged, pampered parasites. If I'd been alive 600 years ago, I would've been beheaded for treason.

    Airmiles Andy is one of the most atrocious, sleazy, creepy, wastes of oxygen in the entire universe, ditto his ex wife, and by default I'm afraid, his ghastly, over entitled daughters, but in particular, Beatrice. She has exactly the same purpose in life as someone like Paris Hilton; although, to be fair to Hilton, at least she has made her own money and not just lived off her parents.

    If she had any ounce of savvy, she would quit the endless holidays and do some public charity work - it might well be a token gesture - but at least it might help change public perception.She is, apparently, patron of a dyslexia charity, but it would appear in name only as she appears to do absolutely diddly squat in terms of fundraising or awareness. It's not her fault that she was born into such privilege, but she could have the power to change things if she wanted.

    Royal supporters always say things like "they have to put up with a lot. Attending functions, not having much privacy, waving at people, meeting people" They do have a choice, they could decline to be part of it but they never will. They know when they're on to a good thing.

    People were throwing up their hands in horror at White Dee and Black Dee on Benefits Street TV programme for being spongers but the royals are just as bad. What are they Blue Dees?
  • SambdaSambda Posts: 6,210
    Forum Member
    Hotgossip wrote: »
    I'm sure somebody will come along who worships the ground all these royal spongers walk on. Don't you know people flock from all over the world just to see the royals? :D They don't come here to look at our old buildings, beautiful scenery or fabulous coastlines ..... Just the royals apparently. :D

    Yes, that always makes me laugh - tourists come here "because of the Royal Family". The castles and residences are all listed, so they'd be there anyhow. How does, say, an American tourist get to actually interact with the royal family? Are they expecting to go on the tour around Buck House and actually bump into the Queen doing a bit of dusting, and exchange plesantries? To walk into a bedroom there and find Phil in bed with his laptop downloading porn (quickly minimising it when somebody comes in)? Walk into a bathroom and there's Eugenie showering, flashing her ENORMOUS norks? I wouldn't pay for any of that.

    (Except the last one)
  • Poppy99_PoppyPoppy99_Poppy Posts: 2,255
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    With parents like hers, is it any wonder? It is disgraceful though.
  • DiamondDollDiamondDoll Posts: 21,460
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Hotgossip wrote: »
    Prince Edward is "fine":confused::confused: He's a clown prince, a comedy act, a waste of space. Why the hell he needs security and bodyguards to go on a shopping trip is beyond me.

    I said 'fine' because I really don't know much about him.:blush:

    As the Monarch's son though, if I think his siblings merit protection, I cannot pick and choose who gets what.
    Is that better? :p
  • The PrumeisterThe Prumeister Posts: 22,398
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Hotgossip wrote: »
    Royal supporters always say things like "they have to put up with a lot. Attending functions, not having much privacy, waving at people, meeting people" They do have a choice, they could decline to be part of it but they never will. They know when they're on to a good thing.

    People were throwing up their hands in horror at White Dee and Black Dee on Benefits Street TV programme for being spongers but the royals are just as bad. What are they Blue Dees?


    There are a small few who milk the benefits system, (mainly it is a system used by those who genuinely need it) but they are small fry compared to the spongers at the top like the royals and Gary *cough* Barlow. They cost the economy billions more than the pilloried poor.
    I said 'fine' because I really don't know much about him.:blush:

    As the Monarch's son though, if I think his siblings merit protection, I cannot pick and choose who gets what.
    Is that better? :p

    I know someone who used to work as Eddie's PA. The man can't even run a bath - he is a clueless twunt.
  • Leicester_HunkLeicester_Hunk Posts: 18,316
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    There are a small few who milk the benefits system, (mainly it is a system used by those who genuinely need it) but they are small fry compared to the spongers at the top like the royals and Gary *cough* Barlow. They cost the economy billions more than the pilloried poor.

    Lord Frodsham :D ;-) :D
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 10,488
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Hotgossip wrote: »
    I'm sure somebody will come along who worships the ground all these royal spongers walk on. Don't you know people flock from all over the world just to see the royals? :D They don't come here to look at our old buildings, beautiful scenery or fabulous coastlines ..... Just the royals apparently. :D

    Reminds me of a ' discussion ' I was having with a male relative at a party some years ago. He, like me, was in his 50s but unlike me, pro royal and his argument was exactly that. 'They're worth every penny because they bring in the tourists and all the money that generates.' After pointing out to him that the French didn't seem to be doing too badly I asked him how many times he'd seen the Queen. When he said never I couldn't resist asking why not as he was such a royalist and we only lived ( and had done all of our lives ) in S London, about 15 miles from Buck House! He didn't reply.

    I've noticed in recent years more and more people are saying ' I haven't got time for any of them except the Queen. Never a foot wrong in all her years.' Wonder if we'll all become republicans when she pops her clogs or will it be ' poor Charlie, he's waited so long we've got to give him a go' 😸
  • Sweet FASweet FA Posts: 10,923
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    With parents like hers, what does one expect? Classless, shameless liggers, the lot of them...
  • Simon_MoreSimon_More Posts: 709
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    What job did she have?
  • AlberonAlberon Posts: 482
    Forum Member
    According to her wiki page since leaving her Sony job in January she's been taking a finance course in America, but exactly what or where doesn't seem to be known.

    I don't believe she gets any Civil List money (though I know it's called something else now) and she's in a long term relationship with an exec from Virgin Galactic so she doesn't exactly need the public's money.

    I'm very far from being a monarchist, but it does seem to me she's far from being the worst one of that lot.

    As to the actual worth of the Royals I am reminded of a quote by Mark Steel about the supposed tourist money they generate.
    But do the tourists who visit Paris, stand at the top of the Eiffel Tower, and think "Hmm, well it's quite a nice view, but the lack of a monarch seems to spoil it"?
Sign In or Register to comment.