Options

Sex View Bandwidth on Hotbird

I've just replaced my Echostar 3000, which went belly up, with a Technomate 6900HD+ Super, connected to a V-Box, as no one seems to do 36v built-in positioners anymore. I also changed the LNB on my 1.2m dish with a new 0.1db model.

Programming the V-Box was a bit of a faff, but got there in the end. The trouble now is with the Sex View Viaccess package. It was always quite a soft picture via the Echostar, but with the TM6900 it's much sharper, but is now also prone to random momentary pixalisation, with some of the channels being slightly better than others. There was also really bad sound sync drift on the Echostar which the TM6900 seems to have completely sorted. Which is nice.

So, the question is, have I mucked something up and now have, say, too much signal, or is SV just not keeping its MPEG encoders up to speed by cramming too many channels into one transponder? If so, is this a recent phenomena?

The Echostar used to report about 80% signal strength, 70% signal quality. The TM6900 reports about 95% signal strength, 75% signal quality. Non-encrypted channels, like BBC World, NHK, and Euronews, are rock solid with no hint of pixalisation.

Swinging the dish to Astra/Eurobird brings up a rock solid BBC-HD, so I'm pretty sure the trouble is either with my Viaccess cam or card, or SV themselves and their rubbish bandwidth.

Anyone any comments / ideas?

Cheers

Comments

  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 337
    Forum Member
    The channels you mention seem to have an average birate of approx 1Mbit/s which makes the likes of ITV 4 look posivitely brilliant by comparison!!!
  • Options
    Mark AMark A Posts: 7,692
    Forum Member
    So in other words, it's SV themselves and their crappy transmission rates? If so, I wonder how come the Echostar never seemed to suffer the same problem? Unless it's only very recently that SV have dropped their transmissions to such low rates?

    Regards

    Mark
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 6
    Forum Member
    I was viewing sv last night for the first time in ages, for educational purposes you understand.

    Reall bad quality, pixilating, message saying no or bad signal. poor.

    Thought it was the rain and wind, but a quick google search tells me it's sv and their poor transmition.
  • Options
    Manc-RedManc-Red Posts: 2,371
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Wooper wrote: »
    I was viewing sv last night for the first time in ages, for educational purposes you understand.

    Reall bad quality, pixilating, message saying no or bad signal. poor.

    Thought it was the rain and wind, but a quick google search tells me it's sv and their poor transmition.

    I can view this as well, extremely poor stuff must admit.

    VHS was better.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 3,464
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    They are having temporary issues and are aware of the problem.
  • Options
    Mark AMark A Posts: 7,692
    Forum Member
    They might have announced something to that effect on-air. They do enough self-publicising as it is, where they could easily stick a message in without any trouble.

    I'll bet their web page doesn't bother mentioning it either. Don't ya just hate unprofessional pornographers!
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 6
    Forum Member
    Any ideas when they will resolve thier issue?
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 3,464
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Sticking up a message would be nice but they would have to admit all too publicly there is a problem.
    No ideas on when they will fix it but at least they havent packed up shop completely and disappeared which is always liable to happen with these providers.
  • Options
    srpsrpsrpsrp Posts: 1,299
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    TVDX wrote: »
    Sticking up a message would be nice but they would have to admit all too publicly there is a problem.
    No ideas on when they will fix it but at least they havent packed up shop completely and disappeared which is always liable to happen with these providers.


    oops, they've 'changed the name' to Theme X ? You spoke too soon !
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 3,464
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Yes name change but so far the amount of channels seems correct and the channels are now 544x576.
    They claim the days of bad quality are over!.
Sign In or Register to comment.