Options
EE - Will Charlie make one more appearance?
Bitoftreakle
Posts: 207 Forum Member
✭
Even though I don't mind the ambiguity of Charlie's last episode and it leaves it open for a return, I would love him to return as part of the Hubbards' revenge against the Mitchells for an episode where it is revealed Vincent let him live as part of their plan and he surprises Ronnie before taking Matthew and disappearing for good. What does everyone else think? I always wished and hoped for Ronnie to have a child but now she's been shown to be such a nasty and controlling person it would be safer for him to be with Charlie.
0
Comments
Also, she went mad at her sister and him for sleeping together (she did have a point!!) saying how could he with such a young baby etc, but she is happy sleeping with Vincent knowing he has a young baby and wife too!
Really not liking her right now!
It makes me wonder if Declan Bennett was properly axed OR if it was a mutual decision to leave so they keep the door open. If he was axed outright then DTC may have not set up his exit in such a manner, instead making it more conclusive (if he was kept alive in such a case, a future EP could've brought him back). His exit wouldn't have been written with obvious red herrings if they weren't looking at a future one off return.
The whole set up on Thursday, as well as Dot's suspicions about why he left again, means that he'll be back.
Claudette hates Ronnie and Vincent still wants revenge against Phil. He probably paid off Charlie in secret.
I Hope so. Ronnie does not deserve kids because of themis vile, spiteful, selfiah, controlling creature she has become. If not Roxy kills Ronnie!
please let this happen the sanctimonious cow deserves it
I agree with this.
This could actually turn out to be a good story if Vincent isn't a lapdog and is actually getting one over on Ronnie.
Would it not become obvious to Dot and everyone else for that matter when Charlie doesn't come back from visiting his Mum or if he is indeed dead doesn't even call them.
I hope this isn't the end for Charlie and we get a surprise return otherwise it will be another disappointing exit.
Him and Mo are proper Eastenders
I think it is because she is a woman that it appears she is a first tier villain. But I don't think so. All those she has been against have done something to her first. Charlie cheated on her when she was in hospital. Ronnie gave Charlie the money so that Charlie could pay off his father. Charlie's father tried to kill Ronnie.
Ronnie is definitely psychologically damaged - she has been through a lot but I don't think she is a first tier villain. Everything she has done has been in one sense or another protective. She won't allow Charlie to take her son ... hence Charlie vanishes.
So we will find out what happened then?
So Charlie wasn't there when Ronnie most needed him - instead he was busy getting into the underwear of Roxie. From that moment onward the character was ruined for me. Ruined I say. He got his just dessert in the immorality stakes.
agreed. Charlie is no saint in all this. His actions haven't actually helped Ronnie's state of mind
so you're giving the baby snatching Murderer the moral high ground?
After all that nonsense the week he disappeared about him claiming to be nothing like his father, in a shock unforseeable twist we'll probably find out he chose Vincent's money over Matthew, possibly spilling ketchup on him in the process explaining that sudden change of clothes.
Did I say that?
Nick's return was Charlie's fault. He caused the chain of events.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leslie_Grantham#Murder_conviction