Home› Big Brother
Click here to check out Digital Spy's Big Brother section for the latest breaking news, rumours and spoilers.

Why Was Jem Not Replaced

[Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 851
Forum Member
✭✭
in Big Brother #1
For some reason it has just come to me that Jem wasn't replaced. Walkers have always been replaced. Jem herself a replacement for a walker. Yet she wasn't replaced.

Seems to add credence that she was always meant to leave then. Or has it been "explained" why she wasn't replaced and I missed it?

Comments

  • RenThrayskRenThraysk Posts: 22,728
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #2
    Or the only reason they replaced Mark, was because they had the opportunity to create some drama by putting in Faye's sister.
  • Its-GillianIts-Gillian Posts: 3,130
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #3
    With only a few weeks to go it probably just wasn't worth it! whoever they replaced her with would have had a bigger disadvantage than late entries normally have
  • bottleofbestbottleofbest Posts: 8,026
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #4
    Too late in the show to bring someone else in.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 7,363
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #5
    It was a disaster to bring in Jemma and obvious that she would leave even though she would have been a good housemate had she not been the sister of Faye.
    I am glad she wasn't replaced at such a late stage. BB is usually better when there are fewer housemates.
    If I could have chosen a final five it would have been:
    Alex
    Aaron
    Harry
    Jem
    Jay
  • Vicky.Vicky. Posts: 5,948
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #6
    I think it was too late really.

    Though they should have cancelled the eviction for that week IMO.
  • SurferfishSurferfish Posts: 7,659
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #7
    DSDP wrote: »
    Or has it been "explained" why she wasn't replaced and I missed it?

    They couldn't find anyone else butch enough...
Sign In or Register to comment.