Katie Price sensationally claims Peter Andre built a career by 'trashing' her reputat

1356722

Comments

  • gilliedewgilliedew Posts: 7,605
    Forum Member
    Talking about Leo, Alex and all the others in between, but she allowed it to happen, she invited them into her bed, her home and her life, if she hadn't wanted it, it wouldn't have happened. She was the catalyst and when they were not what she wanted she chucked them out and they turned on her, what does she expect.

    I fully expect this to happen quite a few times more o she can say she is the modern Elizabeth Taylor.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,341
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    gilliedew wrote: »
    Talking about Leo, Alex and all the others in between, but she allowed it to happen, she invited them into her bed, her home and her life, if she hadn't wanted it, it wouldn't have happened. She was the catalyst and when they were not what she wanted she chucked them out and they turned on her, what does she expect.

    I fully expect this to happen quite a few times more o she can say she is the modern Elizabeth Taylor.

    But all of them knew what she was when they willingly entered into a relationship with her. None of them were dragged kicking and screaming into her bed.

    There are no innocents amongst the adults here. They all knew what were doing and, in varying degrees, are all to blame for their own part in the whole sordid saga.

    It's like the role reversal of the women who go out with complete b*stards thinking they will be the one to change him. Each of these mad fools think they are the one to tame KP for life when, in fact, they're just the next poor sucker on the conveyor belt of her tales for the next book
  • Azura's StarAzura's Star Posts: 3,190
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    gilliedew wrote: »
    Talking about Leo, Alex and all the others in between, but she allowed it to happen, she invited them into her bed, her home and her life, if she hadn't wanted it, it wouldn't have happened. She was the catalyst and when they were not what she wanted she chucked them out and they turned on her, what does she expect.

    I fully expect this to happen quite a few times more o she can say she is the modern Elizabeth Taylor.

    :confused:
    Not entirely sure what your point is.
    She may well have invited them, but they were hardly fighting her off were they?
    And before anyone uses the "well she put it on a plate for them" argument - there are literally tens of millions of men who wouldn't touch her with a 50ft pole, plate or no plate.
    Alex, Leo (and Kev) are grown men, and I believe that all of them knew exactly what they were getting.
    The fact that what they were getting was KP is entirely their fault.
  • Holly_EvansHolly_Evans Posts: 1,050
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    No one one is innocent, but Katie is the only one claiming to be....
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,341
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    No one one is innocent, but Katie is the only one claiming to be....

    Fair point.....
  • fifitrixibellefifitrixibelle Posts: 3,834
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Oh I'm not defending her at all.
    Of course it's an unpleasant thing to say - but she's an unpleasant person, so no surprise there.
    And whilst she may choose her men, they choose her aswell - so it doesn't exactly say alot for their taste and discernment either.



    Exactly.
    And at least if they had stayed together, neither of them would be rampaging about the place reproducing with any old Kev, Dick and Emily.

    No, they seize the opportunity, clearly they have no discernment and all the more reason why they should not be let loose in her children's home, the glaring difference is that she is a parent and she introduces these random strangers into their home for nothing more than the bucks she gets for shagging strangers to get the wedding exclusive, hawking the pregnancy and baby photo,filling her then t.v show and filling her vacuous books.
    That's her job to ensure their well being, no one else's - she shags bloke's for obvious gain and is still bad mouthing the 'father of her kids' and that is down to her and no one else.
  • Blue Eyed ladyBlue Eyed lady Posts: 6,007
    Forum Member
    Angel Dust wrote: »
    But all of them knew what she was when they willingly entered into a relationship with her. None of them were dragged kicking and screaming into her bed.

    There are no innocents amongst the adults here. They all knew what were doing and, in varying degrees, are all to blame for their own part in the whole sordid saga

    Exactly. They are grown men who willing got into a relationship with KP, as for the reason they chose to do so, who knows:confused:
    Surely they were aware that KP has a vindictive side to her & as soon as the relationship/s went belly up, which they all inevitably do, KP wouldn't sit back & say nothing so I guess it's a case of, play with fire you get burned.
  • fifitrixibellefifitrixibelle Posts: 3,834
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    She's used them for material, but the idea she has used them to further her career - i don't buy that. She's a household name in the UK - even beyond Andre. She would still be around now without "Katie & Peter", but i couldn't be so sure he would be.

    Shagging strangers and reaping the money from 'exclusives'...be it wedding/pregnancy/baby:yawn: and doing K+T's and the never bloody ending sniping at her ex's IS her 'career', so of course she has used them to further it....she has bugger all else so she sells the shags and all the sordid grubby details, hardly a glittering 'career' :rolleyes:...if she wasn't selling her shags what else do you think she would 'still be around' for exactly?
  • sidsgirlsidsgirl Posts: 4,425
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Goaty wrote: »
    Funny as I remember PA came on KP a lots as dog in the jungle.

    Yes, he did Goaty. And apparently Katie soon obliged when they were both out ;). She then ditched her management for his, and the rest is history. :D
  • Brighton BhelleBrighton Bhelle Posts: 723
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Shagging strangers and reaping the money from 'exclusives'...be it wedding/pregnancy/baby:yawn: and doing K+T's and the never bloody ending sniping at her ex's IS her 'career', so of course she has used them to further it....she has bugger all else so she sells the shags and all the sordid grubby details, hardly a glittering 'career' :rolleyes:...if she wasn't selling her shags what else do you think she would 'still be around' for exactly?

    Porn pics and sex tapes possibly.

    Really something for the kiddies to be proud of.
  • gilliedewgilliedew Posts: 7,605
    Forum Member
    :confused:
    Not entirely sure what your point is.
    She may well have invited them, but they were hardly fighting her off were they?
    And before anyone uses the "well she put it on a plate for them" argument - there are literally tens of millions of men who wouldn't touch her with a 50ft pole, plate or no plate.
    Alex, Leo (and Kev) are grown men, and I believe that all of them knew exactly what they were getting.
    The fact that what they were getting was KP is entirely their fault.

    My point is that when she invited them into her life, she was not the vile harriden she relentlessly turns into after a short while.

    These men were invited into her life, the top glamour model of her time and thought they were in clover, but she always turns into Cruella after a short while.
  • Azura's StarAzura's Star Posts: 3,190
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    gilliedew wrote: »
    My point is that when she invited them into her life, she was not the vile harriden she relentlessly turns into after a short while.

    These men were invited into her life, the top glamour model of her time and thought they were in clover, but she always turns into Cruella after a short while.

    Oh I have to disagree with you on that one.
    She is a vile harridan through and through, always has been probably always will be.
    Whilst Peter Andre may be a slightly different case - in that their selling point was them as a couple, I think that definitely Alex, probably Leo and more than likely Kev knew exactly what they were getting, and decided that for them ,it was worth it.
    Yes they were "invited" but there was absolutely nothing stopping them from saying "no", other than, in my opinion, the opportunity to use her as a quick leg up the greasy z-list pole.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 4,020
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    KP and PA were perfect for each other and will never again find such a compatible match away from themselves. Both of them fame and money obsessed, like dogs on heat, I can well imagine (although I really rather wouldn't) that the sex was pretty frequent and 'varied' - well, at least at first. The trouble is, both of them have such colossal egos that it was bound to go t*ts up.

    I have to agree also the who was more famous before the jungle is tedious. He pursued her and she reciprocated. Together and apart they are still milking it for all its worth. Both have shown questionable parenting for different reasons, both are capitalising on past and present relationships and both trying to play the victim.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 110
    Forum Member
    KP is simply a publicity machine doing whatever it takes to appear regularly in papers, magazines and on TV. As time passes, this task becomes more and more difficult so she changes her husband periodically and comes up with wacky stories that will ensure that a newspaper wants to publish them.

    I just feel sorry for her children.
  • pollipolli Posts: 2,180
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    IRONY . A woman whining that the father of her children won't defend her in the press.While she is slating him for the umpteenth time IN the press .
    Defend what exactly ?Her airing all her grubby laundry for cash ?
    I hear she is going in bb,so that's that show ruined for me this time.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,341
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    polli wrote: »
    IRONY . A woman whining that the father of her children won't defend her in the press.While she is slating him for the umpteenth time IN the press .
    Defend what exactly ?Her airing all her grubby laundry for cash ?
    I hear she is going in bb,so that's that show ruined for me this time.

    That's 3 weeks of my life I've just got back as I refuse to watch her swanning around like the queen of sheba droning on.

    We know it'll be fixed for her to stay in as they won't pay the rumoured big bucks to see her evicted after a week
  • gilliedewgilliedew Posts: 7,605
    Forum Member
    Oh I have to disagree with you on that one.
    She is a vile harridan through and through, always has been probably always will be.
    Whilst Peter Andre may be a slightly different case - in that their selling point was them as a couple, I think that definitely Alex, probably Leo and more than likely Kev knew exactly what they were getting, and decided that for them ,it was worth it.
    Yes they were "invited" but there was absolutely nothing stopping them from saying "no", other than, in my opinion, the opportunity to use her as a quick leg up the greasy z-list pole.

    You are assuming that they knew all about her before they entered into a relationship. Alex perhaps knew more than the others due to the TV programme but Leo didn't even speak English.

    Pete thought she was the same as in the jungle or wanted to think that and she was for a while after they married but she couldnt keep the lid on her nastiness or her wild slutty behaviour.

    Yes, she did offer it to them on a plate in the beginning, drunk as a skunk, it was photographed constantly.

    If she didn't want them for a relationship or even a one nighter, be assured they wouldn't have got to first base.
  • Brighton BhelleBrighton Bhelle Posts: 723
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    gilliedew wrote: »
    You are assuming that they knew all about her before they entered into a relationship. Alex perhaps knew more than the others due to the TV programme but Leo didn't even speak English.

    Pete thought she was the same as in the jungle or wanted to think that and she was for a while after they married but she couldnt keep the lid on her nastiness or her wild slutty behaviour.

    Yes, she did offer it to them on a plate in the beginning, drunk as a skunk, it was photographed constantly.

    If she didn't want them for a relationship or even a one nighter, be assured they wouldn't have got to first base.

    Wasn't Kev a celeb 'chaser' on Twitter and rejected by two or three other women before hitting on Katie?
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,270
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    he obviously didn't trash her, but he did milk the 'poor me' card for all it was worth..
  • Azura's StarAzura's Star Posts: 3,190
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    gilliedew wrote: »
    You are assuming that they knew all about her before they entered into a relationship. Alex perhaps knew more than the others due to the TV programme but Leo didn't even speak English.

    Pete thought she was the same as in the jungle or wanted to think that and she was for a while after they married but she couldnt keep the lid on her nastiness or her wild slutty behaviour.

    Yes, she did offer it to them on a plate in the beginning, drunk as a skunk, it was photographed constantly.

    If she didn't want them for a relationship or even a one nighter, be assured they wouldn't have got to first base.


    Maybe Leo can use his lack of English as an excuse, but I cannot believe that Alex / Kev / anyone else didn't know how horrible she is - she'd been on at least 300 series of her tv programme being her normal, horrible self.
    We can all blame her for being herself, but trying to excuse a bunch of grown men for going along with her nonsense just won't wash.
  • Holly_EvansHolly_Evans Posts: 1,050
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    goldiloks wrote: »
    I have to agree also the who was more famous before the jungle is tedious. He pursued her and she reciprocated. Together and apart they are still milking it for all its worth. Both have shown questionable parenting for different reasons, both are capitalising on past and present relationships and both trying to play the victim.


    What different reasons? :)
  • gilliedewgilliedew Posts: 7,605
    Forum Member
    Wasn't Kev a celeb 'chaser' on Twitter and rejected by two or three other women before hitting on Katie?

    Well she must have replied and invited him in
  • gilliedewgilliedew Posts: 7,605
    Forum Member
    Maybe Leo can use his lack of English as an excuse, but I cannot believe that Alex / Kev / anyone else didn't know how horrible she is - she'd been on at least 300 series of her tv programme being her normal, horrible self.
    We can all blame her for being herself, but trying to excuse a bunch of grown men for going along with her nonsense just won't wash.

    It may be a surprise to you but not all are that interested/besotted in the KP/PA as on DS forums.

    Why you give these men that knowledge when they seem as thick as planks and isn't it just they are led by their sexual urge.

    I think they see her, she jumps into bed with them and they use each other until it all ends in tears for both of them.
  • Cyril_SneerCyril_Sneer Posts: 2,314
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    gilliedew wrote: »
    I was quite pleased that so many of the replies in the Daily Mail from their readers were the total opposite to a small number of posters who continually call Peter Andre atrocious names on another thread.

    It showed the number of people who oppose the way Katie Price chooses to portray the her version of the truth,

    But what if her version of the truth is right?

    :confused:
  • Azura's StarAzura's Star Posts: 3,190
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    gilliedew wrote: »
    It may be a surprise to you but not all are that interested/besotted in the KP/PA as on DS forums.

    Why you give these men that knowledge when they seem as thick as planks and isn't it just they are led by their sexual urge.

    I think they see her, she jumps into bed with them and they use each other until it all ends in tears for both of them.

    They are as thick as she is, yet they are portrayed as hapless dolts being led by their bits, whilst she is seen as some kind of Machiavellian temptress, luring these poor, unsuspecting men into her lair.
    I don't think so somehow.
Sign In or Register to comment.