Henry is just perfect, nothing about his looks that you would change . The body , the face , the hairy chest .i think his personality was fine on Graham Norton , not the life and soul of the party but when you look like him , who cares ?
Completely agree....much prefer the handsome silent type myself.
I preferred him in his Tudor days when he was more handsomely rugged and had more of an edge to him. He seems a little too "airbrushed" and has that typical "Hollywood" look about him now:(
I preferred him in his Tudor days when he was more handsomely rugged and had more of an edge to him. He seems a little too "airbrushed" and has that typical "Hollywood" look about him now:(
He's definitely got the Clark Kent look to a T. But he did look better in The Tudors.
So MoS last night and I just cannot get over how beautiful he is. That rugged look of his at the beginning was swooooon. Much better than the clean cut look. Just perfect in every aspect. I'm so shallow.
Comments
Ps...Superman? Again? Really? Forgive me, I don't go to the cinema, Hollywood is run by accountants.
Crowe didn't and he came across really well.
Cavill is just uninteresting and insipid.
Hell no.
But surely there is a happy medium somewhere between the blandest man in the room and a teeny tiny, batshit mental religious loon?
Completely agree....much prefer the handsome silent type myself.
I thought he was a good choice for the title role.
Who cares if he's a bit quiet. We can't all be handsome and chatty.;)
He's definitely got the Clark Kent look to a T. But he did look better in The Tudors.