Another creature locked away for 25 years
Saville abused many more, can only guess his sentence if he was still alive
Life.... minimum 100 years i would think
'Pied Piper' rapist lived above a sweet shop so he could entice dozens of young victims to his home
Lambeth was the birthplace of Ken Livingstone MP whose political sidekick Ted Knight along with 30 other councillors in the mid 1980's were disqualified from political office.
The council became a shamles in the 1980's.
Inquiries and investigations became a way of life amid the chaos and growing corruption of Lambeth. The construction services directorate and the housing maintenance programme were heavily criticised.
For those who like to join up the dots up....PIE in 1975 was based at Railton Road, Lambeth.
This guy says that things were very different back then in the sixties. Not sleeping with a ten year old it wasn't. That even back then would have been a crime so he talking rubbish there. He should have reported Savile when he knew he had taken the girl of ten back to a hotel to spend the night with her.
This guy says that things were very different back then in the sixties. Not sleeping with a ten year old it wasn't. That even back then would have been a crime so he talking rubbish there. He should have reported Savile when he knew he had taken the girl of ten back to a hotel to spend the night with her.
I'm sure in the original documentary he said the child was or looked 13 now she's 10
Dunno if it's been mentioned here yet, but there's likely to be stuff in the papers about Doctor Who in the 1980's at the end of the month, as a result of this book. Not necessarily about paedophilia, though there are people on the Gallifrey Base website message board claiming a 15 year old had to forcibly escape from production manager Gary Downie at a convention in the 90's. (He's dead now so it's not libelous).
I posted about this on another thread as The Sun is running it again today, and it just annoys me that certain parts of the media want everyone to think "paedophilia" at every given opportunity.
The late Nathan-Turner is accused of targeting underage boys for sex.
This type of writing is deliberately meant to make the reader think "paedophile" , was he wrong if he coerced boys into sex, yes of course no one should abuse their position. But none of the people concerned wants to make a complaint, and whilst those boys at 17/18/19 were under the then legal age for homosexual sex at that time as it was 21 the term "under age boys" is very bad journalism to my mind. And if they want to go the underage gay sex route from that era then they will be arresting a large percentage of the country I would think.
In this instance i believe the accuser, that thing better not be allowed to return to its former role :mad:
How do you know he was guilty ? ok juries dont always get it right but they also dont always get it wrong. It wouldn't be the first time a guilty person was found not guilty but it wouldn't be the first time a complainant made up or embellished the facts would it.
Without being an eye witness or hearing all the evidence (not just what The Sun and other tabloid media printed or what the armchair Miss Marples decided based upon the actors onscreen character ) I will rely on the jury.
Comments
http://www.real-whitby.co.uk/savile-the-jaconelli-ring-and-rampton
Saville abused many more, can only guess his sentence if he was still alive
Life.... minimum 100 years i would think
'Pied Piper' rapist lived above a sweet shop so he could entice dozens of young victims to his home
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2298905/Pied-Piper-rapist-lived-sweet-shop-order-lure-children-flat-jailed-25-years.html
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2298979/Suspect-arrested-Jimmy-Savile-investigation-wont-face-charges-abuse-lack-evidence.html#ixzz2OahwmyjE
Think it must be this one
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/jimmy-savile/9670035/Jimmy-Savile-police-arrest-third-man-over-historic-sex-abuse-allegations.html
Funnily enough I was just reading that very article.
https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/316323577102204928/photo/1
Should be on the Mirror site after midnight.
On the Mirror site now
Paedo MP cover-up claim: Top cop removed from sex abuse probe after naming politicians as suspects
The officer suddenly found himself booted off the case and put on a disciplinary after revealing politicians were among the suspects
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/paedophile-mp-cover-up-claim-detective-1785273
I bet the Scofe will have something to say on the This Morning paper review, uhoh
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ugu4sTw0cvw
Thank You. Have bookmarked.
The council became a shamles in the 1980's.
For those who like to join up the dots up....PIE in 1975 was based at Railton Road, Lambeth.
The Daily Mail reported this yesterday...
When parliament lowered the age of consent for homosexuals from 21 to 18, Edwina had proposed the age be lowered to 16.
Has Edwina be questioned by police about giving the keys of Brooadmoor to Jimmy Savile?
Does The Mirror mean Wood Vale rather than South Vale?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21938307
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/mar/26/chelthams-teacher-michael-brewer-jailed
.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2299271/Ex-BBC-producer-cleared-Savile-sex-abuse-probe-criticises-zealous-police-admits-knew-DJ-spent-night-girl-young-TEN.html
This guy says that things were very different back then in the sixties. Not sleeping with a ten year old it wasn't. That even back then would have been a crime so he talking rubbish there. He should have reported Savile when he knew he had taken the girl of ten back to a hotel to spend the night with her.
http://news.sky.com/story/1069970/tv-actor-cleared-of-sex-attacks-on-teen
I'm sure in the original documentary he said the child was or looked 13 now she's 10
ETA: just checked he said 12
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21936350
I posted about this on another thread as The Sun is running it again today, and it just annoys me that certain parts of the media want everyone to think "paedophilia" at every given opportunity.
How the hell did a jury find it not guilty?
In this instance i believe the accuser, that thing better not be allowed to return to its former role :mad:
and the jury concerned listened to ALL of the evidence presented not just snippets in the media.....and based their decision on that information
How do you know he was guilty ? ok juries dont always get it right but they also dont always get it wrong. It wouldn't be the first time a guilty person was found not guilty but it wouldn't be the first time a complainant made up or embellished the facts would it.
Without being an eye witness or hearing all the evidence (not just what The Sun and other tabloid media printed or what the armchair Miss Marples decided based upon the actors onscreen character ) I will rely on the jury.