Am I the only one who thinks Wayne Bridge is acting like an arse?

Comments

• Apple_Crumble Posts: 21,748

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  27/02/10 - 18:27 #2

  Am I the only one who is sick of this story?

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 7,029

  Forum Member

  ✭

  27/02/10 - 18:28 #3

  Apple_Crumble wrote: »

  Am I the only one who is sick of this story?

  
  
  No, I'm sick of it as well. And you can add Cheryl Cole's marriage problems to that list as well.

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 25,366

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  27/02/10 - 18:30 #4

  I second both replies!

  0
• KJ44 Posts: 38,093

  Forum Member

  ✭

  27/02/10 - 18:31 #5

  Sick of it, but I'm with Wayne Bridges. Footy is a team game. QED.

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 7,550

  Forum Member

  ✭

  27/02/10 - 18:31 #6

  Gilbertoo wrote: »

  After his refusal to shake John Terry's hand, does anyone else think that Wayne Bridge is being a bit of an arse?
  
  If what's been reported is true, then nobody cheated on him.....however, if both know something more sinister has taken place, then maybe WB is fully justified in his actions.
  
  The reason for posting in GD is because for me, this requires a broader discussion than just the normal "Chelsea are rubbish" and "He was second pick for England anyway" type responses....

  
  Chelsea are rubbish

  0
• System Posts: 2,096,970

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭✭✭

  27/02/10 - 18:32 #7

  I am sure you're not alone. There's a few posts like yours in the football forum

  0
• Sem1 Posts: 4,578

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  27/02/10 - 18:32 #8

  Where they were still together or not is undecided, JT was trying to WB get back with her as a mate!! And WB's kid was in the room next door when JT was banging her!!
  
  JT is a sh1t, she's a sl*g and WB I'm undecided. My OH says he would have shaken something but it wouldn't have been his hand!:eek::D
  
  Mates ex's out of bounds - this is school ground stuff, you don't sh1t on your own door step!

  0
• Serenity79 Posts: 1,981

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  27/02/10 - 18:33 #9

  I think Wayne should have gone for the 'handshake/slick back hair' fakeout.

  0
• ValLambert Posts: 11,688

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  27/02/10 - 18:33 #10

  Would you shake the hand of the man (who was supposed to be your best mate by the way) who was shagging your partner behind your back, in your house and with your son in the next room a month after you had moved out?
  
  As far as I can tell it isn't clear if they were seperated (it was all a bit like the "on a break" from Friends.) He moved up North, she didn't want to go and as far as he thought they were still trying to work things out. (He, apparently left in August, she was shagging Terry by September and having an abortion in October.) I suspect her reluctance to move was her designs on being the new Mrs Terry.

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 1,572

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  27/02/10 - 18:33 #11

  KJ44 wrote: »

  Sick of it, but I'm with Wayne Bridges. Footy is a team game. QED.

  I agree with this. I'm sick of the story but Bridges has every right to be as pissed off as he likes.

  0
• spoty Posts: 11,195

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  27/02/10 - 18:34 #12

  I love him. And the fact City won today makes me love him even more. :D:D
  
  One joke I heard though= What have Bridge and the Titanic got it common.
  
  They both souldn't have left Southampton:) well it was funny at the time.

  0
• KJ44 Posts: 38,093

  Forum Member

  ✭

  27/02/10 - 18:36 #13

  Sorry Wayne, I know it's not Bridges with an 's', long story

  0
• ohmygosh Posts: 9,696

  Forum Member

  ✭

  27/02/10 - 18:38 #14

  KJ44 wrote: »

  Sorry Wayne, I know it's not Bridges with an 's', long story

  
  I was wondering about that, thought it might be the "sat evening too many bevvies scenario":p:p:D

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 16,275

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  27/02/10 - 18:38 #15

  I'm sick of this turning up in GD, either Sport or Showbiz or Chatter please.

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 7,550

  Forum Member

  ✭

  27/02/10 - 18:38 #16

  KJ44 wrote: »

  Sorry Wayne, I know it's not Bridges with an 's', long story

  
  Eh?

  0
• KJ44 Posts: 38,093

  Forum Member

  ✭

  27/02/10 - 18:39 #17

  ohmygosh wrote: »

  I was wondering about that, thought it might be the "sat evening too many bevvies scenario":p:p:D

  
  Good summary. Spot on,

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 1,572

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  27/02/10 - 18:39 #18

  ohmygosh wrote: »

  I was wondering about that, thought it might be the "sat evening too many bevvies scenario":p:p:D

  Well I'm a girl so Bridges/Bridge who cares it's only a footballer.

  0
• KJ44 Posts: 38,093

  Forum Member

  ✭

  27/02/10 - 18:40 #19

  Carrierbag Head wrote: »

  Eh?

  
  No worries Carrierbags Heads.

  0
• ohmygosh Posts: 9,696

  Forum Member

  ✭

  27/02/10 - 18:41 #20

  KJ44 wrote: »

  Good summary. Spot on,

  
  That's my boy:D

  0
• KnifeEdge Posts: 3,919

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  27/02/10 - 18:41 #21

  Why should he shake the hand of a so called 'friend' who has shown him no loyalty, and who obviously has no integrity. Good on Bridge! And well done Man City!

  0
• Alt-F4 Posts: 10,960

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  27/02/10 - 18:41 #22

  I don't watch football and have never heard of Wayne Bridge, but Chelsea are rubbish.

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 7,550

  Forum Member

  ✭

  27/02/10 - 18:42 #23

  KJ44 wrote: »

  No worries Carrierbags Heads.

  
  Ohhhh, you're post above. NP KJ44s.

  0
• sHaK Posts: 2,911

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  27/02/10 - 18:42 #24

  In his situation, I wouldnt have shook his hand.
  
  JESUS CHRIST, its just a goddamn handshake he didnt do. I bet this will be on tomorrowas front pages as well :rolleyes::rolleyes:

  0
• ohmygosh Posts: 9,696

  Forum Member

  ✭

  27/02/10 - 18:43 #25

  NorklessLottie wrote: »

  Well I'm a girl so Bridges/Bridge who cares it's only a footballer.

  
  Erm I'm a girl too:o:D

  0
• KJ44 Posts: 38,093

  Forum Member

  ✭

  27/02/10 - 18:43 #26

  Whoa. I know it's footy, but what's with the anal-retentive 'wrong forum' stuff?
  
  The OP thinks it's a wider issue; ValLambert's post says why.

  0