God you'd think she was the biggest bitch on the planet they way you all talk about her, and yet you loved Debra Barr and Katie Hopkins :rolleyes:
If anyone on DS loved Katie Hopkins, they were in a minority. Debra Barr wasn't a bitch, she was just a bit brash and insensitive. I don't recall her ever deliberately seeking to be hurtful.
I grew to dislike her as the show went on but she redeemed herself for me in the show about the finalists. I saw her in a much better light in that and not just cause she paid for her school dinners. Not sure i really belived that.
I grew to dislike her as the show went on but she redeemed herself for me in the show about the finalists. I saw her in a much better light in that and not just cause she paid for her school dinners. Not sure i really belived that.
Yeah I'd agree with that. I got a little annoyed when people called her "common" though, that's a nasty word, really it's a mis-used word.
This. She would have made a far more credible finalist than Jim...
Except that by her own admission on You're Fired she wouldn't. She had burned out over the weeks and by the time she was fired had no energy or enthusiasm left.
I don't think Natasha was particularly credible at any time in the series. She was too agressive as a project manager. "I'm the boss" was her mantra. She never acted as a leader, thus gaining the respect of her team rather than demanding it.
Except that by her own admission on You're Fired she wouldn't. She had burned out over the weeks and by the time she was fired had no energy or enthusiasm left.
I don't think Natasha was particularly credible at any time in the series. She was too agressive as a project manager. "I'm the boss" was her mantra. She never acted as a leader, thus gaining the respect of her team rather than demanding it.
So? She's still far more credible than Jim who I still see as a complete joke where making it to the final was concerned. Whether you rate her or not, she had 2/2 PM wins (100%) whereas he had 0/2 (big fat 0%) and was clueless to boot...
So? She's still far more credible than Jim who I still see as a complete joke where making it to the final was concerned. Whether you rate her or not, she had 2/2 PM wins (100%) whereas he had 0/2 (big fat 0%) and was clueless to boot...
The amount of wins are overrated, overvalued, and the win alone doesn't fully demonstrate the credibility of the PM of the team who won the task... especially with the goal posts being in a different place this series.
The amount of wins are overrated, overvalued, and the win alone doesn't fully demonstrate the credibility of the PM of the team who won the task... especially with the goal posts being in a different place this series.
That may well be the case (to an extent) but I can't see Jim leading himself to a win let alone anyone else...
Comments
In fact, I'm not sure that she has a single redeeming quality.
Oh, she does.
Trust me.
If anyone on DS loved Katie Hopkins, they were in a minority. Debra Barr wasn't a bitch, she was just a bit brash and insensitive. I don't recall her ever deliberately seeking to be hurtful.
Oh, and I don't mind Natasha at all.
I liked her, one of my favourites so it was disappointing to see her go last week.
if she had not made the degree admission she probably would have been in the final.
She was a big character in the show
Yeah I'd agree with that. I got a little annoyed when people called her "common" though, that's a nasty word, really it's a mis-used word.
I don't think Natasha was particularly credible at any time in the series. She was too agressive as a project manager. "I'm the boss" was her mantra. She never acted as a leader, thus gaining the respect of her team rather than demanding it.
The amount of wins are overrated, overvalued, and the win alone doesn't fully demonstrate the credibility of the PM of the team who won the task... especially with the goal posts being in a different place this series.