Options
Don't forget "Pants" are trousers in the UK and as for being shy on the ass front!
DrPepper
Posts: 2,655 Forum Member
✭✭✭
Just saying that a tag on PJ bottoms is a bit different to knicker elastic being twanged. But, you'd think they'd never got those cracks out before:
http://twitpic.com/8awju1
Maybe Denise should have stuck a fiver in the waistband to keep them happy.
http://twitpic.com/8awju1
Maybe Denise should have stuck a fiver in the waistband to keep them happy.
0
Comments
So why are there so many posts still with the word 'pants' and not 'trousers?
Denise (as wrong as she was) meant no harm and she apologised. They just took it way too far and all for the drama of it. They think that's won them the show. Hah! I look forward to reality striking once their names are called out on Wednesday's show.
Someone's getting their "pants" in a twist
I like the twins and prefer them over Denise but it totally excuses the incident in terms of THE TWINS REACTION. It shows they have no problem presenting their ass cracks for all to see, so who can take their diary room rants seriously? People with no brains or common sense that's who.
The incident in the house showed far less and was just a joke. If Denise wasn't thinking, she'd have grabbed the pj bottoms at the knee and pulled them down to ankle level. But she just gave a playful yank and stopped way before it went too far.
And Emma Willis has a sense of humour so stick her in that situation and she probably would have had a bit of fun with Denise then did the same to her for a bit of friendly fun.
Erm because that's what karissa said, we are just using her phrasing if you like.
Well played Frankie for saying it how it is and defending Denise, also his line to Nicola about her tongue being in the twins arse was superb.
Yes, I think if I used this bizarre defence in court, if I threw a stuntman over a car bonnet, I wouldn't get very far!
'But your honour he's a stuntman, he shouldn't mind that type of thing':rolleyes:
In school we called it de-bagging. And they were hoiked right down to the ankles. Just passed the arse was considered a failure.
Karissa would have been eaten alive (bad choice of words?) at our school. "It was a partial de-bag, M'lud" *bites knuckle as she re-lives it*. Precious.
NB to the right-on righteous - I know, I know I'm being flippant. Yeah, i'd be irked with Denise too (largely cos my arse is dreadful
I'm Scottish and wear pants for support and hygiene and trousers for warmth and style :cool:
What they do for a living is TOTALLY relevant.
If Denise did that to a doctor dancing in her pj's, then Ms Doc has the right to complain, but in proportion to the incident. But Playboy models who have posed nude and continue to earn a living by flaunting their bodies for the titilation of people who get kicks from pornography and cheap thrills should have accepted the apology and laughed it off.
PMSL
Well said babe, just shows what happens when you put a bunch of adolescents in a house
'People with no brains or common sense' are the ones who seem to believe that a woman doesn't have the right to say no when it comes to displaying her body. Had the twins been given a choice, then that would have been different. No-one has the right to choose for them.
So for the rest of their life people are allowed to flash parts of the twins bodies because of what they do for a living?
Given the level of common sense and reasoning being displayed on this site, the answer would be yes!
What does 'harm' mean in this situation?
Lets take any female housemate past or present, and you were in the house, and you wanted to take her clothes off because you just wanted to because it would feel nice for you.
Wouldn't that be the same reason any sleazy perve would do it?
Would it be intended to be harmful? If not then would it be wrong to do it?
I see a lot of people say "No harm was meant" but can somebody define what this exactly means please?
Just because no harm was meant and it's only meant for self-gratification, that makes it okay and justifies it does it?
What if somebody wanted a new plasma TV and decided to steal it just because they wanted one. No harm was meant, but they just wanted to have it because they were motivated by selfish reasons.
That's okay because no harm is intended?
I can see queues forming for any glamour model or any female celebrity who has ever posed for some lads mag.
It must be like all their Christmases and birthdays rolled into one and all come at once.
They can just choose one of these people and take their clothes off as long as they don't mean it in a harmful way.
I didn't know it was okay, but apparently Richard Desmond's channel seem to be saying it's fine. So it must be true if it's on the telly.
Spot on!
If it had been Michael who had done it, would people feel the same?
Added to the fact that any girl in that industry will have had loads of off colour remarks and gestures aimed at them, hence the attitude to the boys who think they are fair game.
Denise knew what she was doing she subconsciously wanted to bring them down. She doesnt like them full stop no matter what she says.