Options
Steve Backshall deserved more
Tellystar
Posts: 12,253 Forum Member
✭✭
I thought Steve was fantastic, looked more like a professional dancer, so I was surprised that his marks weren't higher.just what does he have to do to impress those judges, yet they waxed lyrical about some other performances which appeared mediocre to me.
0
Comments
I thought it was insane how he and Sunetra got the same marks as Alison, who just shakes her boobs about every week and barely moved at all during her samba
But I'm not sure he deserved any more for his Salsa. It was daring in the lift department but to me it looked to be missing that fluid Latin hip action throughout.
He should probably have been placed higher than Alison but I wouldn't have said he was better than Simon, Mark or Thom last night. And I think his and Sunetra's Salsas were on a par really. They had different things going for and against them but weighed up I felt they were of an equal standard.
I know he's not a natural or acclimatised dancer but I have to respect him and love the energy he brings to everything he does. Quite happy with his marks so far. Realism is the only useful way to go with a new skill. And it's less annoying than inflated scores
he had some tricks probably because he does martial arts and is generally in very good shape but he did not dance that salsa well
The above rated Mark and Simon were both in the bottom two
He is perhaps the least likely Strictly contestant, having spent a lot of the last 20 years in wild parts of the Earth, being a scientist and separated from the showbiz side of Television.
His performance side on Strictly has been a surprise to me, and I think that has helped his scores while he is progressing at learning to dance.
Alison danced more than Steve did in their routines
And charm too... that intangible thing :cool:
I'm sure someone's voting for him. Endangered species everywhere are supporting Steve.
I doubt any of the other contestants could do that, let alone Alison.
both steve and alison are both probable getting votes other than just dance ability
going by the it takes two thread their personalities are appealing to people.
:cool:
Absolutely! I like both of them
I think he encompasses all that is Strictly. He is improving each week and he just gets on with it with a smile on his face. I had never heard of him before the show but I am voting for him each week because I really like his attitude.
Without wanting to do a Len impression, I think they are getting votes for the way they come out and fearlessly go for it. They are both very aware of their limitations, going on their interviews, but they put on a smile and show tremendous intent. I think people like that. Well, I do anyway. The point of the show is people learning to dance.
Steve is a complete learner and it doesn't come easily to him, but he is working his socks off and the improvement from the cha cha cha to the salsa I think should be obvious to anyone. I was really glad the judges commented on his attitude and - now I know he's back in, might not be saying this if he wasn't - I am fine with his score. I think he can improve from here as well - I really hope he can stay in and get the chance.
Actually the point of the show varies depending on the viewer - sometimes it's the best dancer, sometimes it's the one with no experience, sometimes it's the one whi improves the most, sometimes it's the most "likeable" one.
One thing i noticed a long time ago is the endless messages in support of a certain celeb don't make a difference in swaying opinion or influencing the outcome.
I'd be surprised if Steve got any better and i don't think he needs to , to get votes ......and I am pretty sure from experience that Ola is very aware of this
I'm a little less cynical about the process. Sure there's the basic attractiveness or charm of the individual contestants, whoever they are, and that element is for some viewers completely independent of whether they're good or not at the outset. But without signs of getting better the support would stagnate. Look at Natalie last year. She didn't progress because she was amazing from the get go. Abbey on the other hand was able to improve.
Besides, there's already visible improvement in Steve (if you squint and focus hard)... and a lot of room for more too
But i'm looking at the wider picture of who people vote for not just last years final
You've lost me, sorry. 'Wider picture' and that hazy group of voters is what has puzzled me. Do you mean in reality tv generally? Just going by your user name...
My intuition is that in the case of SCD some sense of improvement in whatever aspect is a huge help in holding onto or building support, especially for the lowly beginners. Even spurious improvement is gold. The real stuff (however puny from the pov of the top-of-the-board) has an energy that it's hard to resist. Judy this week, for example. We're a species with some good instincts left and everyone loves a trier :cool:
Abbey in dance off...not always popular
Improved dancers....don't always get the vote
Alesha good from day one....wins
What hazy group of voters are you talking about?
And yeah i said there are numerous reasons people vote there is no 'one point' of the show