Radio 1 risks trouble tomorrow night.

chemical2009bchemical2009b Posts: 5,250
Forum Member
As part of Zane Lowe's Masterpieces, Fatboy Slim's You've Come a Long Way Baby will be played in full and uncut as with all the other albums they have done which means the third track on the album F****** In Heaven which contains 108expletitives is likely to air at the 8pm hour. Wonder how many complaints the BBC and Ofcom will recieve assuming they do that?
«1

Comments

  • ComputerComputer Posts: 2,496
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    As part of Zane Lowe's Masterpieces, Fatboy Slim's You've Come a Long Way Baby will be played in full and uncut as with all the other albums they have done which means the third track on the album F****** In Heaven which contains 108expletitives is likely to air at the 8pm hour. Wonder how many complaints the BBC and Ofcom will recieve assuming they do that?

    Well the show will be plastered with warnings and I don't know how many people without a specific interest in this type of music listen after 8 anyway. There seems to be no reports of complaints over Jay Z's Black album full of F's and N's last night.

    I did find it odd that they didn't, as per the years before, decide to play the albums after 9pm just to be safe though.
  • NailzNailz Posts: 3,054
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Slightly OT but Fatboy Slims album is far from a masterpiece
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 377
    Forum Member
    Nailz wrote: »
    Slightly OT but Fatboy Slims album is far from a masterpiece

    It's a R1 Masterpiece!
    Most "masterpiece" albums are too old and "pre-music" for 21st Century R1!
  • fonzerellifonzerelli Posts: 979
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    They played the Smiths last night which is very much a "masterpiece"
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 377
    Forum Member
    fonzerelli wrote: »
    They played the Smiths last night which is very much a "masterpiece"
    WHAT!!! They'll be bringing back Bates & his Golden Hour at this rate with all this "old music" ;)
  • JasonJason Posts: 76,557
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    fonzerelli wrote: »
    They played the Smiths last night which is very much a "masterpiece"

    But it's all subjective isn't it ?

    What you or I might consider a masterpiece, someone else won't. I personally found Jay Z's Black album quite amazing as i'd never listened to it in it's entirety before.
  • fonzerellifonzerelli Posts: 979
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    WHAT!!! They'll be bringing back Bates & his Golden Hour at this rate with all this "old music" ;)

    Haha! We were speaking about Simon Bates just last night. I mentioned Simon Mayo's "Our Tune" and quickly got shot down as it was originally Bates' feature. Too young to remember and only remember Mayo's version!! lol
  • xtralargeanorakxtralargeanorak Posts: 287
    Forum Member
    WHAT!!! They'll be bringing back Bates & his Golden Hour at this rate with all this "old music" ;)

    Now then! Now then! how's about Jimmy Savile's Old Record Club on a Sunday Afternoon. Wham! at number one, twenty five years ago, guys 'n' gals!
  • Mapperley RidgeMapperley Ridge Posts: 9,922
    Forum Member
    Back on topic... Radio 1 risks no trouble at all, provided due notice is given of potentilly offensive language. Radio has no official watershed, though in the BBC stations have to be mindful of the audience listening at that time. Offence is also defined by "expectation" - so, by playing a track, would the audience "expect" it (yes) and would they "expect" to be offended (no). It's not like it's being played unannounced in the middle of Chris Moyles' show.
  • John WJohn W Posts: 861
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Computer wrote: »
    There seems to be no reports of complaints over Jay Z's Black album full of F's and N's last night.

    I did find it odd that they didn't, as per the years before, decide to play the albums after 9pm just to be safe though.

    This week I produced a podcast of 1930s music, and took the decision to edit out the N word from a 1932 version of 'The Sun Has Got His Hat On'.

    I think the lyrics were changed for the Me And My Girl west end show in 1938, is that right?
  • Mapperley RidgeMapperley Ridge Posts: 9,922
    Forum Member
    I'm not sure when the offending word was removed John - but it's an interesting topic. I guess broadcasters have to consider the context of their programmes as well as the content. In the came of your podcast, you were probably right to edit it out. But I suepect other broadcasters would have taken a different view.

    Depends of the programme too - if it's exploring the way songs were written back then and the social climate of the time I'd say leaving it in would be fine. But if it's just back to back music, with few links or explainations, you'd have to be careful.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 646
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Be interesting to see the reaction. Yes they've been mentioning all day that they're running it and it will be uncensored with "rude words" (Fearne Cotton description) so that will be their defence.

    What about the person who has radio 1 tuned in their car, hasn't heard it for days and goes for a drive around the time it's on, or someone who happens to be tuning through stations and hasn't heard the warning either.

    Most people who listen to Radio 1 won't mind language, but anyone who randomly just tuned in to find a song full of it might be a bit shocked.
  • Mapperley RidgeMapperley Ridge Posts: 9,922
    Forum Member
    What about the person who has radio 1 tuned in their car, hasn't heard it for days and goes for a drive around the time it's on, or someone who happens to be tuning through stations and hasn't heard the warning either.

    I don't know, but I'll put money on the Daily Mail trying to find thejm right now :D
  • JasonJason Posts: 76,557
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Most people who listen to Radio 1 won't mind language, but anyone who randomly just tuned in to find a song full of it might be a bit shocked.

    I did wonder that myself as well, but I imagine that ofcom would want to be reasonably satisfied that R1 made every possible effort to warn people about the offending language.

    I guess they must realise that there will always be a percentage of people who would tune in randomly, so maybe there's some kind of acceptable 'collateral damage' of sorts ?
  • Mapperley RidgeMapperley Ridge Posts: 9,922
    Forum Member
    I guess they must realise that there will always be a percentage of people who would tune in randomly, so maybe there's some kind of acceptable 'collateral damage' of sorts ?

    The test would be whether the BBC had done everything they reasonably could have to warn listeners of the content before the broadcast, not during it.

    There was a classic case on TV a few years ago where Spooks showed a scene of a woman having her head pushed into an acid bath. Compliants were upheld because the BBC hadn't given an explicit enough warning in the link directly before the show.

    It sounds like they've done plenty in this case.
  • JasonJason Posts: 76,557
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    It sounds like they've done plenty in this case.

    I know with the Black album, they really couldn't have made it any clearer about the content.

    Gonna give it a listen anyway, i haven't heard the full album before.
  • satman5000satman5000 Posts: 1,482
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    As already mentioned radio has no watershed, it is based on audience expectation and who could be listening at the time.

    Breakfast shows means lot's of younger listeners therefore the audience expectation would mean no strong language, the same could be said about afternoon shows, however, it also depends on the station. Take Radio 4 / 7 which have had strong langugage present in their drama's / comedies with no complaints.

    I listened to the Black Album on Zane's show the other night, there was only one warning before it was played in full. Zane Lowe is a specialist show, a warning was given, the audience were well aware of the week of shows going ahead.

    As far as I am concerned, this is the what the BBC does best, no commercial station is going to start playing this album in full at 8pm.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 789
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I wondered when this subject would pop up.

    After the Jay-Z album the other night, someone I know who I was talking to via Facebook had this to say about it.

    "it was Zane Lowe's hour long break. He played Jay-Z's Black Album right through, which is a fine piece of work (if you like that kind of thing), but to be putting it out at 8pm uncensored is a bit much."

    " I emailled the BBC about it. It's OK to be 'pioneering' in broadcasting, but there are certain parameters that need to be used. I don't suppose a mother picking up her eight year old from Cubs would have been too impressed hearing that in the car on the way home."

    ..... and I tend to agree.

    Everyone is well aware of the TV watershed timings, even if they do push the boundaries at times. I believe most people associate radio, especially the BBC with the same thoughts.
  • satman5000satman5000 Posts: 1,482
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Whitey_GRN wrote: »
    I wondered when this subject would pop up.

    After the Jay-Z album the other night, someone I know who I was talking to via Facebook had this to say about it.

    "it was Zane Lowe's hour long break. He played Jay-Z's Black Album right through, which is a fine piece of work (if you like that kind of thing), but to be putting it out at 8pm uncensored is a bit much."

    " I emailled the BBC about it. It's OK to be 'pioneering' in broadcasting, but there are certain parameters that need to be used. I don't suppose a mother picking up her eight year old from Cubs would have been too impressed hearing that in the car on the way home."

    ..... and I tend to agree.

    Everyone is well aware of the TV watershed timings, even if they do push the boundaries at times. I believe most people associate radio, especially the BBC with the same thoughts.

    If you don't like what you hear switch it over.

    Also I would be surprised if an 8 year old would decide to put Radio 1 on the radio to listen to Zane Lowe
  • JasonJason Posts: 76,557
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    satman5000 wrote: »
    Also I would be surprised if an 8 year old would decide to put Radio 1 on the radio to listen to Zane Lowe

    I'd have to agree with that I think.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 789
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    satman5000 wrote: »
    If you don't like what you hear switch it over.

    Also I would be surprised if an 8 year old would decide to put Radio 1 on the radio to listen to Zane Lowe

    Who says an 8 year old would be specifically listening to Zane Lowe.

    I know my kids would listen to Galaxy as they play dance music and the hits. Though Galaxy change later in the evening and when it has been on in the car they don't believe me when I say it is Galaxy.

    Guess that won't be the case with Galaxy for much longer mind and has shown signs of the continuous 'hits' for a while now. Sorry, off topic. :p
  • tellyadicttellyadict Posts: 4,057
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I think its such a great thing to do this.

    As so many say you don't often listen to an album from start to finish anymore.

    They did say 13 mins in switch of for 4 mins if you will be offended. If people don't turn off then don't complain.
  • JasonJason Posts: 76,557
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Well track 3 is on in all it's uncensored glory :)

    There's still the juvenile in me that giggles at hearing naughty words at this time of night on the TV or Radio ...
  • JasonJason Posts: 76,557
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    good album but i'm not as in to it as I was the Black Album
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,984
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I loved the first half of it but didn't really enjoy the latter half as there weren't many lyrics and was completely different to the singles. Did love the sweary song, though!
Sign In or Register to comment.