No, if they were shown, the programme would be four times as popular as it is now, even if it only lasts a week due to complaints from certain parties.
No, if they were shown, the programme would be four times as popular as it is now, even if it only lasts a week due to complaints from certain parties.
Do you think they'll ever show the fights in the future?
No, if they were shown, the programme would be four times as popular as it is now, even if it only lasts a week due to complaints from certain parties.
Certain parties? Who were they, then?
I know it's hypocritical to watch the show and bitch about it like many of us on this thread do, but anyone who wants it off the air for being a bear-baiting freak show has my full backing.
I know it's hypocritical to watch the show and bitch about it like many of us on this thread do, but anyone who wants it off the air for being a bear-baiting freak show has my full backing.
The people aren't forced to go on the show, they phone the show up.
I know it's hypocritical to watch the show and bitch about it like many of us on this thread do, but anyone who wants it off the air for being a bear-baiting freak show has my full backing.
Probably Mediawatch, OFcom and the Tories. Not exactly bastions of free speech are they?
Jeremy picks these kind of people to appear, then he can talk down to them and make himself look like the big man. Failing that he'll invite some poor child with disabilities onto the show, so he can talk to them like they're stupid, and therefore make himself look like he cares.
Anyone see this mornings show? Mother accuses her daughter of stealing some money from her; before the daughter comes out Jeremy basically has a go at the mother saying things like "If one of my kids say they're telling the truth I'd believe them/Why don't you believe your own daughter love?/Why don't you buy what she says?" Then daughter fails lie detector test and Jeremy says, "I knew you stole that money!"
Does he intentionally make himself look a complete tool or..?!
Anyone see this mornings show? Mother accuses her daughter of stealing some money from her; before the daughter comes out Jeremy basically has a go at the mother saying things like "If one of my kids say they're telling the truth I'd believe them/Why don't you believe your own daughter love?/Why don't you buy what she says?" Then daughter fails lie detector test and Jeremy says, "I knew you stole that money!"
Does he intentionally make himself look a complete tool or..?!
It doesn't really matter...... he is pocketing the readies whatever we think of him.
Anyone see this mornings show? Mother accuses her daughter of stealing some money from her; before the daughter comes out Jeremy basically has a go at the mother saying things like "If one of my kids say they're telling the truth I'd believe them/Why don't you believe your own daughter love?/Why don't you buy what she says?" Then daughter fails lie detector test and Jeremy says, "I knew you stole that money!"
Does he intentionally make himself look a complete tool or..?!
Yep, he did. I dont't know why he kept on at her as It was pretty obvious why the mother didn't believe her daughter as it turned out that she had stolen before off her grandmother, hence why the mother brought her on the show.
Anyone see this mornings show? Mother accuses her daughter of stealing some money from her; before the daughter comes out Jeremy basically has a go at the mother saying things like "If one of my kids say they're telling the truth I'd believe them/Why don't you believe your own daughter love?/Why don't you buy what she says?" Then daughter fails lie detector test and Jeremy says, "I knew you stole that money!"
..?!
I saw that bit too, and I thought the exact same thing. It was completely illogical; he changed tack half way through and seemed to completely contradict everything he'd said before. Up until that point, he seemed preoccupied with trying to stir up antagonism between the mother and daughter (he seemed quite frustrated when they were amicable and friendly towards each other, and he kept digging away to try and provoke some conflict and cast the mother as the baddie who'd let her child down). Then he suddenly switched sides and tried to claim he'd sussed out the daughter was guilty all along, which, as you say, was completely at odds with the stance he'd taken at the start!
He seems able to spout totally contradictory views and turn on a sixpence, sometimes even being presented with the same scenario twice within the same show and treating the people involved completely differently. Say, a girl comes on the show not knowing the father of her baby and he'll give her a really hard time and treat her like a trollop. Then another girl will come on in the exact same situation, and he'll fawn all over this one being all sympathetic, as if she's a poor besmirched maiden who's been "made pregnant" by some horrid man.
....Or, a guest will say he's been in prison and Jeremy will jump down their throat and bark: "WELL DON'T BREAK THE DAMN LAW THEN!" But the next guest will say they've been to prison and Jeremy will go all sentimental and reverential: "But it was the making of you, wasn't it? Good on you for turning your life around!"
It's as if he has two responses ready for each scenario, one critical, one sympathetic, and he trots out one or the other depending on whether the guest has been cast as a goodie or a baddie.
Comments
Things might liberalise after 2015....
I think the Daily Mail readers complained about the fights to Ofcom.
Up until the middle of last year I think.
No, if they were shown, the programme would be four times as popular as it is now, even if it only lasts a week due to complaints from certain parties.
Not unless a special late night edition is commissioned!
Someone forgot to take their medication.
Certain parties? Who were they, then?
I know it's hypocritical to watch the show and bitch about it like many of us on this thread do, but anyone who wants it off the air for being a bear-baiting freak show has my full backing.
Jeremy Kyle in the Sun.
Probably Mediawatch, OFcom and the Tories. Not exactly bastions of free speech are they?
Does he intentionally make himself look a complete tool or..?!
It doesn't really matter...... he is pocketing the readies whatever we think of him.
Yep, he did. I dont't know why he kept on at her as It was pretty obvious why the mother didn't believe her daughter as it turned out that she had stolen before off her grandmother, hence why the mother brought her on the show.
I saw that bit too, and I thought the exact same thing. It was completely illogical; he changed tack half way through and seemed to completely contradict everything he'd said before. Up until that point, he seemed preoccupied with trying to stir up antagonism between the mother and daughter (he seemed quite frustrated when they were amicable and friendly towards each other, and he kept digging away to try and provoke some conflict and cast the mother as the baddie who'd let her child down). Then he suddenly switched sides and tried to claim he'd sussed out the daughter was guilty all along, which, as you say, was completely at odds with the stance he'd taken at the start!
He seems able to spout totally contradictory views and turn on a sixpence, sometimes even being presented with the same scenario twice within the same show and treating the people involved completely differently. Say, a girl comes on the show not knowing the father of her baby and he'll give her a really hard time and treat her like a trollop. Then another girl will come on in the exact same situation, and he'll fawn all over this one being all sympathetic, as if she's a poor besmirched maiden who's been "made pregnant" by some horrid man.
....Or, a guest will say he's been in prison and Jeremy will jump down their throat and bark: "WELL DON'T BREAK THE DAMN LAW THEN!" But the next guest will say they've been to prison and Jeremy will go all sentimental and reverential: "But it was the making of you, wasn't it? Good on you for turning your life around!"
It's as if he has two responses ready for each scenario, one critical, one sympathetic, and he trots out one or the other depending on whether the guest has been cast as a goodie or a baddie.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJ9cZtblNsY
Such an arrogant pratt!
Probably wanks himself off to pictures of Maggie Thatcher.