Films you just don't 'get'

Assa2Assa2 Posts: 10,345
Forum Member
✭✭
I watched Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Pt 1 last night and was left some what bewildered.

It's not that I didn't understand the film or the story. In fact, quite the opposite, I felt like sod all actually happened, the HP v Voldermort story was no further along than where it was before the film started (except for a couple of points). Yes, there were clearly some essential plot points such as what the Deathly Hallows were, why they were important, how to destroy a Horcrux, but that was pretty much it for nearly 2.5 hours. I realise as part 1 of 2 it's going to be open ended but I don't get why it's thought of as one of the best of the HP films. Maybe when seen in conjunction with P2 it will make sense but I somehow doubt it. I suspect I didn't get this film mainly because I haven't read the book.

Anyway, what films don't you 'get' and do you have an idea why?
«13456

Comments

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,013
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. I got it, it's just that when I did, I didn't want 'it' any more. I should probably give it a second chance, it's been a while - but all I remember were two protagonists that I didn't care about running through scenes of childhood past. It was as entertaining as sawdust...
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 80
    Forum Member
    'No Country for Old Men', really didnt get the ending to that film at all.
  • Mark AMark A Posts: 7,692
    Forum Member
    I've always understood the term 'get', in reference to films, as meaning 'understood'. That's a lot different from 'didn't care for'.

    For example, a lot of anime I don't fully understand as they rely on understanding often subtle Japanese cultural references, yet that doesn't stop me enjoying them.

    On the other hand, I've seen plenty of films I fully understand, yet think are awful, and when some fan of it tells me I just don't 'get' it, well, it makes me want to punch them repeatedly in the face, to be honest - arrogant tossers! I know fully well what I don't like, and it's not a matter of 'getting' it, thank you very much.

    Regards

    Mark
  • EELoverEELover Posts: 1,146
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Revolver completely bewildered at the end of it
  • cliffy91cliffy91 Posts: 1,462
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    No country for old men

    The oxford murders - that was just strange
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 3,290
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    EELover wrote: »
    Revolver completely bewildered at the end of it

    I'll second that.... I watched it twice and still didn't understand the plot!

    I used to think I was clever until I watched that film! ha
  • Carlos_dfcCarlos_dfc Posts: 8,262
    Forum Member
    Assa2 wrote: »
    I watched Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Pt 1 last night and was left some what bewildered.
    What I don't get, is the fascination of Harry Potter, for anyone older than 15 or so.

    Tried to read one of the books a few years ago, really tried to get into it...
    But lets face it - it's for kids.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 30
    Forum Member
    Vanilla Sky. I think I need to watch it again.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 16
    Forum Member
    "Shortbus". Just what is the point of that film??
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,265
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Harry Potter 1-7 whats the fascination ?
    The Fountain .... very confusing
    Southland Tales ...seriously WTF !
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,265
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Trickers wrote: »
    Vanilla Sky. I think I need to watch it again.
    Brilliant film that is :)
  • EELoverEELover Posts: 1,146
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Harry Potter 1-7 whats the fascination ?
    The Fountain .... very confusing
    Southland Tales ...seriously WTF !

    Oh god, I'd forgotten that one, what the hell was it about?
  • Sez_babeSez_babe Posts: 133,998
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    Trickers wrote: »
    Vanilla Sky. I think I need to watch it again.

    I watched it with someone who had watched it before and I still didn't really understand it
  • RBRB Posts: 352
    Forum Member
    Inception - the spinning top a the end make your own conclusion
  • newman2005newman2005 Posts: 214
    Forum Member
    never understood guy ritchie movie called "revolver" and Jason Statham had hair in it.

    random



    newman
  • Sez_babeSez_babe Posts: 133,998
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    RB wrote: »
    Inception - the spinning top a the end make your own conclusion

    Yeh that was a good ending, I thought
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 10,273
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I like it when a film makes me think or makes me want to watch it again....Memento, Pulp Fiction, Mulholand Drive...

    If I don't ''get'' a film and I don't really care that I don't ''get'' it I right it off as a bad film..... Inception (sorry fans, I just didn't care enough about the charactors to put the effort in).
  • GlowbotGlowbot Posts: 14,847
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    leaby wrote: »
    Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. I got it, it's just that when I did, I didn't want 'it' any more. I should probably give it a second chance, it's been a while - but all I remember were two protagonists that I didn't care about running through scenes of childhood past. It was as entertaining as sawdust...

    That's the first one that sprang to my mind also. It's supposed to be good and acclaimed but I just felt like it was lacking.

    I don't get Mulan Rouge or Titanic and Romeo and Juliet was pretty weak in my mind.
  • degsyhufcdegsyhufc Posts: 59,251
    Forum Member
    "Shortbus". Just what is the point of that film??
    A pretentious way to show porn in a mainstream (just) film.
  • -GONZO--GONZO- Posts: 9,624
    Forum Member
    Austin Powers is a set of movies I just don't get. Oh and also don't get the fascination with Twilight.
  • lordOfTimelordOfTime Posts: 22,359
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Assa2 wrote: »
    I watched Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Pt 1 last night and was left some what bewildered.

    It's not that I didn't understand the film or the story. In fact, quite the opposite, I felt like sod all actually happened, the HP v Voldermort story was no further along than where it was before the film started (except for a couple of points). Yes, there were clearly some essential plot points such as what the Deathly Hallows were, why they were important, how to destroy a Horcrux, but that was pretty much it for nearly 2.5 hours. I realise as part 1 of 2 it's going to be open ended but I don't get why it's thought of as one of the best of the HP films. Maybe when seen in conjunction with P2 it will make sense but I somehow doubt it. I suspect I didn't get this film mainly because I haven't read the book.

    Anyway, what films don't you 'get' and do you have an idea why?
    Hallows #1 is a fantastic film. Can't praise it highly enough.

    With Hallows #1 you just have to go with it because it is absolutely faithful to the book in every way a screenplay can be. So there's a lot of focus on the trio, on the run, undesirables one, two and three.

    It's a major departure from the blend that made up the rest of the films before it. Bit the bit with the Dursleys, the journeys to Hogwarts, fighting evil at the castle.. etc etc.

    In this film however that's all gone. It's down to Harry Vs Voldemort in a totalitarian evil world. They're alone and there's that chilling feeling of the gathering storm as it were, the big war to come. As such the trio are given so much more freedom to act and the difference is immense. So even if it's not the action you're enjoying it's the acting talent on offer, and I do use that word because the difference even between this and Half Blood Prince is breathtaking.

    There are several stand out moments to keep you going during the film.

    Malfoy Manor. ("Nagini, Dinner") :D
    The opening scenes at the Burrow
    Ron loses it and leaves the trio
    The dance
    The horcrux moment before Ron destroys it
    The Hallows Animation (The tales of Beedle the Bard)
    Dobby's death right at the very end
    And for me the clincher... the cliffhanger at the end when Voldemort clasps his ands on the Elder Want.


    But you're absolutely right. You need to read the books or at the very least get up to date on the previous films or you won't know what is going on. Having seen Hallows 2 twice, I still rate this as the best Potter film.
  • Margo ChanningMargo Channing Posts: 5,240
    Forum Member
    Donnie Darko

    I thought it was Uber wanky

    "oh wow like donnies all tortured maaaaaaaan"

    naff off
  • thedarklordthedarklord Posts: 2,162
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Anchorman.
  • HelboreHelbore Posts: 16,069
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I'm assuming we are using "don't get it" in the context of "I really don't get what all the fuss was about," as opposed to "I don't understand the film."

    In that case, i will say "Traffic." It was so critically acclaimed, but when I sat down to watch it, I found it so mind-numbingly dull and pretentious. One of those films that thinks if it tries to be as realisitc as possible, it is hard-hitting drama. Instead, it was just dull and uninteresting. I couldn't give a flying f**k about any of the characters and their lives. I didn't care one jot what happened to any of them, just so long as they got off my screen as quickly as possible. I even watched it throguh to the end, hoping some big twist would come along and make everything before worthwhile. Alas, it was just long and dull.

    It's rare I actually find watching a film painful - even bad ones I can generally sit through to the end without constantly checking my watch - but this film is one of those few. I'd rather sit in silence, doing nothing, than have to sit through it again.
  • theshadowtheshadow Posts: 731
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    The Hangover

    I know I am totally in the minority here. But I didn't 'get it'. Didn't think there was much laughs in it. Thought the tiger and baby in the hotel room was completely absurd. If it was a 'Scary Movie' or 'Austin Powers' type movie then it might have been funny. But it was just out of context and completely unbelievable in a film that was played for straight laughs.
    Okay, you can all slaughter me now....
Sign In or Register to comment.