Options

Daybreak wins record viewing figures

chimpochimpo Posts: 958
Forum Member
✭✭
Well there's a turn up for the books! celebritain.com report that Daybreak has won its highest viewing figures ever, and is now on a steady high!

To be fair, i did watch it today and was impressed with their guests.
«1

Comments

  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,984
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I bet the daily Mail aren't shouting about that, they have had it dead and buried for weeks!
  • Options
    garyessexgaryessex Posts: 9,083
    Forum Member
    Daybreak went up by 150,000 viewers
    BBC Breafast went by 500,000 viewers

    The Snow Effect
  • Options
    chimpochimpo Posts: 958
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Daily Mail HATE it!
  • Options
    ftvftv Posts: 31,668
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    garyessex wrote: »
    Daybreak went up by 150,000 viewers
    BBC Breafast went by 500,000 viewers

    The Snow Effect

    Daybreak actually got 1 million on its launch day and BBC Breakfast got 2.2 million yesterday. I would expect another high audience today but a little early for the champagne corks at ITV Towers:DActually the official BARB figure for Daybreak is 957,000.
  • Options
    chimpochimpo Posts: 958
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    It's just one of those things - ITV will never beat BBC at breakfast, just as they never will with sport, the queens speech and christmas day.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 67
    Forum Member
    It's only a record for Daybreak! That's like putting the bunting up because Wayne Rooney dated someone under sixty.
  • Options
    teeswolfteeswolf Posts: 3,950
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    chimpo wrote: »
    It's just one of those things - ITV will never beat BBC at breakfast, just as they never will with sport, the queens speech and christmas day.

    Didn't GMTV win the ratings battle in the days of Eamonn and Fiona?
  • Options
    GeorgeSGeorgeS Posts: 20,039
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    ftv wrote: »
    Actually the official BARB figure for Daybreak is 957,000.

    excluding HD
  • Options
    lundavralundavra Posts: 31,790
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Wasn't there a report in the papers that the Jeremy Kyle programme also gained quite a lot of viewers presumably because more people at home.
  • Options
    Almira GAlmira G Posts: 18,451
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    It's only a record for Daybreak! That's like putting the bunting up because Wayne Rooney dated someone under sixty.

    :D:D:D:D:D
  • Options
    ftvftv Posts: 31,668
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    GeorgeS wrote: »
    excluding HD

    Glad you spotted that GeorgeS but BBC still beating them 2-1:D
  • Options
    Hound of LoveHound of Love Posts: 80,138
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    garyessex wrote: »
    Daybreak went up by 150,000 viewers
    BBC Breafast went by 500,000 viewers

    The Snow Effect

    This!
  • Options
    jake lylejake lyle Posts: 6,146
    Forum Member
    chimpo wrote: »
    It's just one of those things - ITV will never beat BBC at breakfast, just as they never will with sport, the queens speech and christmas day.

    Gmtv was winning the Breakfast wars up until 2007;)
  • Options
    jake lylejake lyle Posts: 6,146
    Forum Member
    chimpo wrote: »
    Well there's a turn up for the books! celebritain.com report that Daybreak has won its highest viewing figures ever, and is now on a steady high!

    To be fair, i did watch it today and was impressed with their guests.

    Award for most misleading thread of the year goes to you. Share is practically the same as last weeks:D. It just that theres more audience watching in the mornings now because of the weather. To put things in context even The one show had over 6m yesterday up from their usual 4.5m



    Daybreak had 1m for their launch and Breakfast had 1.4m on the same day.
    Yesterday Daybreak 1m Breakfast 2.2million:cool:
  • Options
    thelostonethelostone Posts: 2,697
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    So its now got 7 viwers
  • Options
    grumpyscotgrumpyscot Posts: 11,354
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I still think Daybreak is dire. Adrian Chiles is just so useless. He has no personality at all.
  • Options
    GeorgeSGeorgeS Posts: 20,039
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    ftv wrote: »
    Glad you spotted that GeorgeS but BBC still beating them 2-1:D

    as I said previously its mainly the older aged group that are now housebound who are adding to the breakfast tv audience. these viewers are more likely to favour the BBC option (farting presenter notwithstanding) ;)
  • Options
    GeorgeSGeorgeS Posts: 20,039
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    grumpyscot wrote: »
    I still think Daybreak is dire. Adrian Chiles is just so useless. He has no personality at all.

    Grumpy scot dislikes grumpy brum shock :D
  • Options
    BigOrangeBigOrange Posts: 59,674
    Forum Member
    Bit of a misleading thread since it wasn't a new record. Comparing year-on-year shows the reality of Daybreak's plight:

    Thursday 2nd December 2010
    Breakfast: 2.15m (41.3%)
    Daybreak: 957k (20.6%)
    Lorraine: 1.27m (18.0%)


    Thursday 26th November 2009
    Breakfast: 1.25m (32.6%)
    GMTV: 929k (24.0%)


    So Daybreak's share yesterday was a fair bit lower than what GMTV was achieving and wasn't much further ahead in viewer numbers despite being a busy news morning. Most of the new viewers looking for information on the weather and travel situation headed straight for the BBC. In addition, the gap between the two went from 9 share points in 2009, to 22 share points yesterday.

    Hardly a good result. Really there should be a thread celebrating Breakfast's performance, since that show is the one going from strength-to-strength, not its flagging commercial rival.
  • Options
    Digi DanDigi Dan Posts: 988
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Dancc wrote: »
    Bit of a misleading thread since it wasn't a new record. Comparing year-on-year shows the reality of Daybreak's plight:

    Thursday 2nd December 2010
    Breakfast: 2.15m (41.3%)
    Daybreak: 957k (20.6%)
    Lorraine: 1.27m (18.0%)


    Thursday 26th November 2009
    Breakfast: 1.25m (32.6%)
    GMTV: 929k (24.0%)


    So Daybreak's share yesterday was a fair bit lower than what GMTV was achieving and wasn't much further ahead in viewer numbers despite being a busy news morning. Most of the new viewers looking for information on the weather and travel situation headed straight for the BBC. In addition, the gap between the two went from 9 share points in 2009, to 22 share points yesterday.

    Hardly a good result. Really there should be a thread celebrating Breakfast's performance, since that show is the one going from strength-to-strength, not its flagging commercial rival.

    I'm sure I remember reading that viewing figures for GMTV also included Lorraines show?
  • Options
    ftvftv Posts: 31,668
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Newspaper reports today that Daybreak is to reduce the number of days Adrian and Christine present and increase the number of days for Dan Lobb and Kate Garraway. Execs have made the amazing discovery that the programme actually gets a bigger audience when Adrian and Christine are not on.
  • Options
    mossy2103mossy2103 Posts: 84,308
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    ftv wrote: »
    Newspaper reports today that Daybreak is to reduce the number of days Adrian and Christine present and increase the number of days for Dan Lobb and Kate Garraway. Execs have made the amazing discovery that the programme actually gets a bigger audience when Adrian and Christine are not on.

    So the slow morph back to GMTV continues ......
  • Options
    RobbieSykes123RobbieSykes123 Posts: 14,022
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    We can at least have a laugh about Maydaybreak's sudden ratings slump next week once the snow melts!
  • Options
    lundavralundavra Posts: 31,790
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    ftv wrote: »
    Newspaper reports today that Daybreak is to reduce the number of days Adrian and Christine present and increase the number of days for Dan Lobb and Kate Garraway. Execs have made the amazing discovery that the programme actually gets a bigger audience when Adrian and Christine are not on.

    Classic bit of face-saving! I can imagine them never actually admitting that they drop Chiles and Bleakley, just reduce the number of appearances slowly "because of other commitments" and then no one will notice that they only appear very occasionally on the programme.
  • Options
    ftvftv Posts: 31,668
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    lundavra wrote: »
    Classic bit of face-saving! I can imagine them never actually admitting that they drop Chiles and Bleakley, just reduce the number of appearances slowly "because of other commitments" and then no one will notice that they only appear very occasionally on the programme.

    It's already started - when Chiles is doing a mid-week football match he takes Wednesday and Thursday off and she doesn't appear without him so she gets two days off as well.It's a bizarre arrangement for two highly-paid presenters - if one of them is ill does the other take days off too ?
Sign In or Register to comment.