You and your chums are "playing the man not the ball". If you need clarification on the meaning behind that expression I suggest you google it.
Going forward, address your replies to the content of a post rather than the right of someone/anyone to air that opinion in the first place. It is not an Appreciation thread so you are going to read views that disagree with yours but that does not mean those comments are an invitation to start critiquing the poster. Is that clear enough?
Straker, here's some show-related comment as you are requesting. Let's look at today's lineup
Headlines/detailed stories
Baby poisoning in hospital (w/ live interview)
G7 summit (Live to Sue Jameson in Brussels)
England World Cup injuries
D-Day Remembered (Live to Normandy)
Presidential Workout
Other news stories covered
Full paper roundup covering front pages
Search for Madeline McCann
Victims of anti-morning sickness bodge drugs
Manhunt in canada for shot police officers
By-election in UK city
Soldier saves stranger in Kent (w/report, guest)
Hailstones/storms in USA (w/report)
Prince William at job event, waffling (presenters discuss)
(regional news)
Fluff/light-hearted
Lobster sandwich for $160
Wheel of cash
Asking viewers: People being kept awake by their pets (from Daily Mail feature today)
Short entertainment segment
Celeb Interview: Les Dennis
Let's face it, hardly a bad or even particularly downmarket mix.
Where have you stated what you want from the show? Point me to the post I'll go read it
I`ve said - An improvement. I watch bits of Sky (paper review etc) and find that a professional balance of hard news and showbiz (as I`ve said elsewhere on this thread IIRC) so I`m not anti-commercial breakfast TV. I don`t much like what BBC1 offers but it`s bland and inoffensive so hardly worth getting worked up about. I listen to Radio 4 mostly and, as I`ve also said before, stick a camera in that studio and I`d watch that in preference to anything else.
GMB back down to 500,000 and a 13.8% share yesterday.
Seems to have found its level at around 500,000 - 600,000 then (any rounding factors notwithstanding).
I thought a 15% audience share was the minimum to make GMB viable ? Bushmills' figure means it could have been as low as 450,000.Daybreak's final figure was 600,000.
I thought a 15% audience share was the minimum to make GMB viable ? Bushmills' figure means it could have been as low as 450,000.Daybreak's final figure was 600,000.
It could also be as high as 550,000
Both are way above the figure the papers told me it had now sunk to, I thought it only got 250k thesedays?!
Er, that was one figure for one bank holiday, as you seem to have pointed out previously (maybe on more than one occasion).
And 550,000 is still less than the quoted 600,000 that Daybreak was getting.
Agree, some people try to spin bad figures doesn't matter re the odd 50k well maybe to GMB it does, it's small change, bottom line, it's not getting the viewers.
Comments
What do you want too see from the show?
Naughty. Calling people "trolls" is against the rules.
What to do....................?
Headlines/detailed stories
Baby poisoning in hospital (w/ live interview)
G7 summit (Live to Sue Jameson in Brussels)
England World Cup injuries
D-Day Remembered (Live to Normandy)
Presidential Workout
Other news stories covered
Full paper roundup covering front pages
Search for Madeline McCann
Victims of anti-morning sickness bodge drugs
Manhunt in canada for shot police officers
By-election in UK city
Soldier saves stranger in Kent (w/report, guest)
Hailstones/storms in USA (w/report)
Prince William at job event, waffling (presenters discuss)
(regional news)
Fluff/light-hearted
Lobster sandwich for $160
Wheel of cash
Asking viewers: People being kept awake by their pets (from Daily Mail feature today)
Short entertainment segment
Celeb Interview: Les Dennis
Let's face it, hardly a bad or even particularly downmarket mix.
Asked and answered. Why do you keep asking the same thing multiple times?
I think I`d like an apology for calling me a troll. Yes, that`s what I`d like......
Where have you stated what you want from the show? Point me to the post I'll go read it
Now I'd like a response to my post listing the mix of stories from today's show.
I`ve said - An improvement. I watch bits of Sky (paper review etc) and find that a professional balance of hard news and showbiz (as I`ve said elsewhere on this thread IIRC) so I`m not anti-commercial breakfast TV. I don`t much like what BBC1 offers but it`s bland and inoffensive so hardly worth getting worked up about. I listen to Radio 4 mostly and, as I`ve also said before, stick a camera in that studio and I`d watch that in preference to anything else.
GMB back down to 500,000 and a 13.8% share yesterday.
Seems to have found its level at around 500,000 - 600,000 then (any rounding factors notwithstanding).
I thought a 15% audience share was the minimum to make GMB viable ? Bushmills' figure means it could have been as low as 450,000.Daybreak's final figure was 600,000.
This seems to be the norm on Fridays now. I have to say it does work better with three than four.
What about Ranvir though?
Ranvir should be given a regular slot as she's popular, although personally I don't rate her.
I think she brilliant and much better than the over paid, no -talent, average looking, orange skin Ms Reid.,
Personal insults are just pointless and unneccesary.
It could also be as high as 550,000
Both are way above the figure the papers told me it had now sunk to, I thought it only got 250k thesedays?!
No, I think that 250k sort of figure was for the Bank Holiday edition the week before last.
And 550,000 is still less than the quoted 600,000 that Daybreak was getting.
Doesn't matter I if it's 500k or 550k it's really doing Bradley and far worse than the axed and allying Daybroke.
Agree, some people try to spin bad figures doesn't matter re the odd 50k well maybe to GMB it does, it's small change, bottom line, it's not getting the viewers.
Wow.
They want to be careful they don't get a nosebleed.