about what, did he mention what one he's sorry for. Mary.
About whether there would be a sing off or not.He admitted that they may have been misled on this and apologised for it,but insisted it wasn't intentional.
Unintentional my backside - it's really not difficult to inform the viewing public before the lines open or at the very latest at the end of the Saturday show that there will be a sing off, and that our votes "alone" will not save our favourite.
I'm glad he's apologised but it's not been without a lot of wriggling and protest.
About whether there would be a sing off or not.He admitted that they may have been misled on this and apologised for it,but insisted it wasn't intentional.
shouldn't he bring Mary back, if it was intentional.
Unintentional my backside - it's really not difficult to inform the viewing public before the lines open or at the very latest at the end of the Saturday show that there will be a sing off, and that our votes "alone" will not save our favourite.
I'm glad he's apologised but it's not been without a lot of wriggling and protest.
Of course it was intentional.Dermot was deliberately vague and ambigious on Saturday and using weird legalistic phrases.They were clearly keeping their options open in case Cher needed to be saved.
Yeah it's a bit weird because i remember watching all of last years on here unless they upload it in full later on? Hope so!
I'm glad you remembered as well. I was beginning to think I was imagining it :eek: Maybe it will go up tomorrow. They might be letting the press print whatever headlines they want first to maximise sales *fingers crossed*
Even if it was unintentional it really was incompetence.
Not letting Louis or Dermot know and still not having it in the X-Factor script is a balls up.
He's been rumbled.
He may have made a big mistake there.Ignorance is no defence in law.If somebody actually sued $yco for Innocent misrepresentation I think he would loose now.If the red tops sponsored someone to take $yco to court, who voted for Mary I think they would win.A precident would be set then for other claiments.
Not sure this will happen - but there is an opportunity there.Not sure what OFCOM could do though apart from rap his knuckles a bit.
Of course it was intentional. Dermot was deliberately vague and ambigious on Saturday and using weird legalistic phrases.They were clearly keeping their options open in case Cher needed to be saved.
When the judges were voting, Dermot made a complete song & dance about being REALLY REALLY clear that they were voting for who they wanted to put through to the final, as opposed to other weeks where they were voting for who they wanted to send home. To me it sounded like a legal issue for him to be so adamant about the change so they MUST have known it wasn`t a normal singoff like all the others, as Simon keeps trying to claim it was.
When the judges were voting, Dermot made a complete song & dance about being REALLY REALLY clear that they were voting for who they wanted to put through to the final, as opposed to other weeks where they were voting for who they wanted to send home. To me it sounded like a legal issue for him to be so adamant about the change so they MUST have known it wasn`t a normal singoff like all the others, as Simon keeps trying to claim it was.
Yes, this - I might be wrong, but didn't he also say something about wanting to make sure it was 'completely transparent'? To me, that's a huge red flag. In the past, he's never made as big a deal out of it when judges say that they're keeping someone, as opposed to sending someone home.
Comments
About whether there would be a sing off or not.He admitted that they may have been misled on this and apologised for it,but insisted it wasn't intentional.
there's more to it than that. i don't trust a single word that comes out of his mouth anymore. Every word sounds insincere.
there's not an actual link but the articles relating to today's conference have youtube clips at the end
Not letting Louis or Dermot know and still not having it in the X-Factor script is a balls up.
He's been rumbled.
I'm glad he's apologised but it's not been without a lot of wriggling and protest.
shouldn't he bring Mary back, if it was intentional.
Of course it was intentional.Dermot was deliberately vague and ambigious on Saturday and using weird legalistic phrases.They were clearly keeping their options open in case Cher needed to be saved.
Good point : if he acknowledges viewers "may have been misled",does that not put last weekend's result entirely in doubt?
Yeah it's a bit weird because i remember watching all of last years on here unless they upload it in full later on? Hope so!
He may have made a big mistake there.Ignorance is no defence in law.If somebody actually sued $yco for Innocent misrepresentation I think he would loose now.If the red tops sponsored someone to take $yco to court, who voted for Mary I think they would win.A precident would be set then for other claiments.
Not sure this will happen - but there is an opportunity there.Not sure what OFCOM could do though apart from rap his knuckles a bit.
Hmmm... if it does couldnt he put Mary back in?
exactly,
Ofcom comes out and says that there was no foul play.
Simon comes out and says sorry guys we did mislead you but we didn't mean to hurt you so it's okay.
I don't believe for a second that it was "unintentional". This sums up my opinion:
Cowell has come very close to admitting that Mary was illegally eliminated from the show today,without realising he has done so.
Yes, this - I might be wrong, but didn't he also say something about wanting to make sure it was 'completely transparent'? To me, that's a huge red flag. In the past, he's never made as big a deal out of it when judges say that they're keeping someone, as opposed to sending someone home.