|
||||||||
HDR - 1.00.03 installed on new devices |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 74
|
HDR - 1.00.03 installed on new devices
Just replaced my HDR due to a fault. The new one has 1.00.03 installed. Dated 6 March 2009.
Cannot see any differences so far but I've only used it for a few minutes. Still cannot delete programmes whilst it is recording
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hawkwell, Essex
Posts: 2,186
|
Quote:
Just replaced my HDR due to a fault. The new one has 1.00.03 installed. Dated 6 March 2009.
Cannot see any differences so far but I've only used it for a few minutes. Still cannot delete programmes whilst it is recording ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: South Coast, UK
Posts: 4,952
|
6th March is extremely new for a software realese date...
Automan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Surrey
Posts: 79
|
as new as it might be, it would have been nice to share it online as well.
If it is already in hardware send to consumers, it must for sure be ready for an internet release... |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Worcester
Posts: 4,185
|
is it perhaps just an interim update which allows new boxes to update over air using just one LNB feed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Surrey
Posts: 79
|
that was already possible once 1.02 was installed....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Redditch Worcs
Posts: 17,289
|
Wonder if this allows recording of the 3rd channel that's time shifteable (a la icord) ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Near Darlington.
Posts: 196
|
The Update Date on my .03 is February 6th, so the date in the original post might have been a typo.
Paul. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 74
|
Quote:
The Update Date on my .03 is February 6th, so the date in the original post might have been a typo.
Paul. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Co. Donegal
Posts: 797
|
Quote:
As this update has been available for over a month why hasn't it been pushed out OTA?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hawkwell, Essex
Posts: 2,186
|
Quote:
You are correct. As this update has been available for over a month why hasn't it been pushed out OTA?
Perhaps you two are unknowingly beta testing it first ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,324
|
Quote:
And why are Humax so silent on what it contains?
Seem a possibility since it doesn't seem to have changed anything noticable so far. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,805
|
Quote:
Just replaced my HDR due to a fault. The new one has 1.00.03 installed. Dated 6 March 2009.
Cannot see any differences so far but I've only used it for a few minutes. Still cannot delete programmes whilst it is recording ![]() Surely there must be some changes, have you still not found anything? Dying to know what this has fixed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 50
|
Quote:
Surely there must be some changes, have you still not found anything? Dying to know what this has fixed.
The change might not be something visible to end users.If it was a change to aid manufacturing testability (for example) then there'd be no need to release it to existing users. Mike |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fife
Posts: 4,038
|
Quote:
Just replaced my HDR due to a fault. The new one has 1.00.03 installed. Dated 6 March 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,805
|
Quote:
How about the loader? Is it a new version - different to the current U7.51. Look at the boot screen: http://foxsat-hdr.wikispaces.com/fil...max_splash.jpg
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fife
Posts: 4,038
|
Quote:
The current one is 7.52 as that is what I have.
Not all HDR are the same... we have 3 slight different ones out in the wild... BTW: A good source of knowledge found here, indicates no UI/recording/etc changes... |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 1,302
|
The 1.00.03 fixes an issue to do with software updates which isn't a problem at this time, thus why we haven't paid for the OTA to be broadcast. We will likely combine this with something more substantial when we are ready.
Bob |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hawkwell, Essex
Posts: 2,186
|
Quote:
The 1.00.03 fixes an issue to do with software updates which isn't a problem at this time, thus why we haven't paid for the OTA to be broadcast. We will likely combine this with something more substantial when we are ready.
Bob Rgds. Les. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 1,302
|
No, that's why it isn't being broadcast, it is to deal with an issue that might occur in certain combinations, we are debating sending out .03 but it wouldn't actually benefit you at this time. In fact it was put into production just because it was the latest version in our software release database not because it was required.
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hawkwell, Essex
Posts: 2,186
|
Quote:
No, that's why it isn't being broadcast, it is to deal with an issue that might occur in certain combinations, we are debating sending out .03 but it wouldn't actually benefit you at this time. In fact it was put into production just because it was the latest version in our software release database not because it was required.
OK Bob-Cat, thanks for clarifying. Rgds. Les. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 296
|
Any news?
Quote:
No, that's why it isn't being broadcast, it is to deal with an issue that might occur in certain combinations, we are debating sending out .03 but it wouldn't actually benefit you at this time. In fact it was put into production just because it was the latest version in our software release database not because it was required.
Here's hoping, Woolfynorm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Surrey
Posts: 79
|
Quote:
The 1.00.03 fixes an issue to do with software updates which isn't a problem at this time, thus why we haven't paid for the OTA to be broadcast. We will likely combine this with something more substantial when we are ready.
Bob But ok, if there is no benefit what so ever, it is to an extent pointless in sending out an update. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 74
|
Quote:
Understanding that an OTA update cost money, but why not make it available online for download? That would at least keep cost to a bare minimum?
But ok, if there is no benefit what so ever, it is to an extent pointless in sending out an update. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dumfries, Caldbeck Tx Cumbria
Posts: 79
|
software
having recently bought a Humax how I determine what s/w it has as I do not know how long the supplier may have had it in stock?
I tried to see if it would download new s/w but was told no new s/w available Last edited by charlo : 16-03-2009 at 20:23. Reason: added extra text |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:49.




