Originally Posted by thenetworkbabe:
“The comment about Ruthie is true but so is the converse. The skaters have zero experience of or training in acting, directing or performing on stage or directing or performing on television. There's no reason why they should know what looks good or credible or entertaining on TV. Their careers were based on what would please professional judges looking at an ice rink. They may have choreographed some of their own performances but that still leaves a role for someone like Jason saying that the choreography is weak or the detail of the performance is sloppy and someone like Ruthie pointing out the acting is non-existant or hammy and the entertainment value is minimal. I appreciate that the Ruthie role is the most subjective and the audience are voting for something else anyway but its actually more important to a TV show than somone pointing out that someone's skate, that we can't see, is at the wrong angle.”
Again, I can see what you're saying and I think what it says most to me is that there should be a companion show. I'm not saying that it would solve every problem but it might iron out a few.
Your take on this is that the celeb (and/or couple) performing should be able to act/sell the routine for a tv audience and that the skating judges, while they might have an idea how that should come across for a live audience at a rink, don't necessarily appreciate the complexities of the aforementioned performing skills in the way that Jason or Ruthie does.
My point about Ruthie (and Jason has this problem as well but he tends to be less out of step) was not so much whether she was wrong to do what she did but more the fact that, being so out of line with the skating judges (at least a mark ahead) the public would perceive her to be bonkers. However, that's by the by when considering your other point.
I've never particularly appreciated any significant difference between selling/acting a performance for a rink audience or doing the same for a tv audience. That is to say, I've watched a lot of championship skating on tv and loved what I've seen without thinking, "I bet that would have been far better rinkside - it doesn't quite translate across the cameras." That may be a little simplistic but I think the skaters maybe know more about putting things across for a tv audience than you're giving them credit for. That said, I do see what you're saying about Ruthie. However, either it needs to be made clear that she is
just marking performance (because she rarely seems to give skating any bloody credit) or she should be coached in what to look for and credit when judging skating and mark accordingly (as Jason seems to). Having a judge there who seems not to credit skating at all (or does so arbitrarily if and when she ever does) is never going to go down well unless it's made absolutely transparent that Ruthie is only there to judge performance and nothing else.