Originally Posted by Tern:
“My suspicion is that the items were valued at well below thier true value. That would mean that the teams still needed to get good valuations but left them with room to make a profit.
The only item that I can talk of from experience is the rug which was described as 'Indian' and certainly appeared to be that style. Having bought such rugs and carpets both here and in India I would say that £200 would be extremely cheap for a rug of that size unless it was very badly made. (Unless they saw me coming.
)”
“My suspicion is that the items were valued at well below thier true value. That would mean that the teams still needed to get good valuations but left them with room to make a profit.
The only item that I can talk of from experience is the rug which was described as 'Indian' and certainly appeared to be that style. Having bought such rugs and carpets both here and in India I would say that £200 would be extremely cheap for a rug of that size unless it was very badly made. (Unless they saw me coming.
)”
That would make sense, but given the usual tasks that The Apprentice has, it seems a bit too complicated for the likes of Sugar.
I actually have a far more sinister theory:
1. The producers realise that given the original criteria (most turnover, not most profit), Philip's team is on the losing side.
2. They are convinced that Sugar will fire Philip for his shambolic performance (esp. after The PantsMan debacle).
3. The producers try to convince Sugar to fire someone else to spare Philip - his feud with Lorraine may be a ratings-winner.
4. Sugar sees no reason to fire any of the others, ie. Kate, Howard, Lorraine or Mona. In fact, the only other person he wants to fire is Noorul, but he is on the winning team.
5. The producers suggest a last minute change of the rules (most profit, not most turnover) that would result in Philip's team winning. This "gives" Noorul to Sugar (as a compromise for not firing Philip).
6. Sugar fires Noorul but not before firing a shot a Philip telling him to improve.



