|
||||||||
The Interpreter - ITV HD failed AGAIN!! |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Black Hill Tx
Posts: 742
|
The Interpreter - ITV HD failed AGAIN!!
This is really beginning to get tiresome! That's the umpteenth time my HDR has failed when recording something off ITV HD and that stupid red button way of doing things!! (BBC HD seems to record VERY reliably)
We purposely stayed off the Humax and watched something else just to make sure nothing clashed at all and yet it still locks up some 50odd minutes into the program (and of course we didn't know it had 'cause we were over on the TV's Freeview). Just to rub salt in the wounds, when we eventually got the HDR rebooted and switched into ITV HD, it looks like its not even true HD but more like upscaled SD!! Absolute rubbish... ![]() It's now got to the point where my wife refuses to record on the Humax if its something she really doesn't want to miss and frankly, I don't blame her. I've seen Bob_cat's comments elsewhere about "consumer electronics" and this is not the "computer world". Well, I'm sorry Bob_cat but that is quite naive of a manufacturer to think that way. Anything with a CPU and Firmware/Software in it is in the "computer world" whether they like it or not and in that world, if the firmware/software performs poorly, it gets fixed in a timely manner and not 5 months down the line. It's getting to the point now where I feel like taking this machine back to Comet as "not fit for purpose". I wouldn't mind if it even tried to self recover but it doesn't even attempt to do that. It just sits there with frozen video and the sound stream still working for chrissakes!! (knocking Humax on forehead...) Hello Humax! It's a computer! What's wrong with your software engineers making sure that there are non-maskable interrupt routines and crash detection in place so that it can self-reset??? ![]() For me, there are far too many glitches/bugs in the firmware/software for it to be considered "ready for prime time". My Sony HXD860 PVR never suffered from a single glitch like this Foxsat HDR has done... (and trust me, that HXD860 has worked its nuts off for us) It's really not good enough. ![]() [/rant=off] There... I feel a bit better now... |
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 69
|
Quote:
Just to rub salt in the wounds, when we eventually got the HDR rebooted and switched into ITV HD, it looks like its not even true HD but more like upscaled SD!! Absolute rubbish... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Co. Donegal
Posts: 797
|
Quote:
sorry to hear about your record issue - can't comment on that as I didn't try and record this one, but I did tune in at one point and absolutely agree with your upscaled SD comment. Which got me thinking, we hear about new TV programs being recorded using HD cameras etc. What's the technical process for converting films into an HD broadcast - should we expect as much?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 296
|
Quote:
sorry to hear about your record issue - can't comment on that as I didn't try and record this one, but I did tune in at one point and absolutely agree with your upscaled SD comment. Which got me thinking, we hear about new TV programs being recorded using HD cameras etc. What's the technical process for converting films into an HD broadcast - should we expect as much?
Woolfynorm |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Redditch Worcs
Posts: 17,287
|
Both the films recorded fine here in the West Midlands (The Interpreter and My Little Eye)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,494
|
Quote:
It's getting to the point now where I feel like taking this machine back to Comet as "not fit for purpose".
Unfortunately in the past it seems that ITV have failed to mark up HD programmes correctly with the result that some haven't been in HD when advertised as such, have only been available in HD AFTER they've already started (quite common by a few seconds and sometimes by minutes), only 1/2 the programme has been in HD or recordings have failed to start / end because of seemingly missing markers. There are also the notoriously bad News break markers that cut off the programme before the break has started losing the end of part 1 and often cut it back in after the break has finished losing the start of part 2. Its easy to blame Humax here but from past problems it appears the problems are often with ITV and their programming of the EPG. I gave up recording anything off ITV HD several months ago as it's simply not worth the hassle. If ITV want to keep their audience and thus advertisers happy, they really need to run a separate channel for HD instead of a Red Button service because the Red Button Sucks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Black Hill Tx
Posts: 742
|
Quote:
Whether this explains why The Interpreter appears to have been upscaled SD is another matter. It is recent enough that ITV should have been able to obtain just the HD copy, which they could downscale for SD transmission. Perhaps that's what they did, but then upscaled the downscaled version for the HD transmission. It seems far fetched but, given ITV HD's record, not implausible.
My resounding message to ITV would be the same as in other walks of life, "if you can't stand the heat, get OUT of the kitchen and make way for someone who can!!" It is totally unacceptable, in my opinion, for ITV to do what it is doing to besmirch the HD platform and the excellence that it can and should achieve (and the BBC shows how; on a daily basis). Definitive HD can only be broadcast with a complete commitment (financially) right through from production to broadcast and I'm sorry if I seem like an old stuffed shirt but good old "Auntie" BBC sets the benchmark daily on how it should be done and blows ALL the competition out of the water. Yes, there are not enough HD hours broadcast in the day by the Beeb but I feel that just reflects the "honesty" of the funding that has been budgeted for it rather than lack of production commitment. I don't even know why Channel 4 bothers with its HD channel to be honest... From what I've seen of it (in non-Freesat mode on the HDR), less than 10% of its output is proper HD. I suppose at least ITV are a bit more honest when it comes to "content" in that it's implemented using the red button nonsense but that in itself must be seen as a half-hearted attempt at HD broadcasting driven by lack of funds... (and then of course, there's the "upscaled SD" discussion point...) |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Black Hill Tx
Posts: 742
|
Quote:
There's a lot of thought CPN that the problem isn't with the box on ITV.
... I gave up recording anything off ITV HD several months ago as it's simply not worth the hassle. If ITV want to keep their audience and thus advertisers happy, they really need to run a separate channel for HD instead of a Red Button service because the Red Button Sucks! Interesting thoughts but then, why should that cause the Humax to crash and burn? There are obviously some decoding glitches in the software somewhere if it is that sensitive that it can't cope with any fast switching? Colin |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 563
|
Recorded OK in Anglia (ITV Anglia S ) region
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 296
|
Quote:
There's a lot of thought CPN that the problem isn't with the box on ITV.
Unfortunately in the past it seems that ITV have failed to mark up HD programmes correctly with the result that some haven't been in HD when advertised as such, have only been available in HD AFTER they've already started (quite common by a few seconds and sometimes by minutes), only 1/2 the programme has been in HD or recordings have failed to start / end because of seemingly missing markers. There are also the notoriously bad News break markers that cut off the programme before the break has started losing the end of part 1 and often cut it back in after the break has finished losing the start of part 2. Its easy to blame Humax here but from past problems it appears the problems are often with ITV and their programming of the EPG. I gave up recording anything off ITV HD several months ago as it's simply not worth the hassle. If ITV want to keep their audience and thus advertisers happy, they really need to run a separate channel for HD instead of a Red Button service because the Red Button Sucks! Woolflynorm |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Crawley, W Sussex
Posts: 5,556
|
sat down to watch it on my skyHD box - good pq - but I realised after 30 secs that I had seen it so will have to wait until Tuesday for something to watch on itvHD
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Black Hill Tx
Posts: 742
|
Quote:
What's the red button service, when I select an ITV programme that's available in HD if offers me the option to record it, much like BBC 1, am I missing something?
Woolflynorm The main difference from selecting a HD recording between BBC and ITV is that for BBC, the HDR simply switches channels to 108 (any HD BBC1/2 output is always simulcast on BBC HD) during its recording whereas, for ITV, it has to do all the red button jiggery pokery and switch to a pseudo channel indicated in the transponder stream and hope that its there when it switches! Colin |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Black Hill Tx
Posts: 742
|
Quote:
sat down to watch it on my skyHD box - good pq -
For me, it's either HD or it isn't and upscaled SD in my book, in no way is HD. Maybe I've just got fussy eyes... |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Redditch Worcs
Posts: 17,287
|
Quote:
This is really beginning to get tiresome! That's the umpteenth time my HDR has failed when recording something off ITV HD and that stupid red button way of doing things!! (BBC HD seems to record VERY reliably)
We purposely stayed off the Humax and watched something else just to make sure nothing clashed at all and yet it still locks up some 50odd minutes into the program (and of course we didn't know it had 'cause we were over on the TV's Freeview). Just to rub salt in the wounds, when we eventually got the HDR rebooted and switched into ITV HD, it looks like its not even true HD but more like upscaled SD!! Absolute rubbish... ![]() It's now got to the point where my wife refuses to record on the Humax if its something she really doesn't want to miss and frankly, I don't blame her. I've seen Bob_cat's comments elsewhere about "consumer electronics" and this is not the "computer world". Well, I'm sorry Bob_cat but that is quite naive of a manufacturer to think that way. Anything with a CPU and Firmware/Software in it is in the "computer world" whether they like it or not and in that world, if the firmware/software performs poorly, it gets fixed in a timely manner and not 5 months down the line. It's getting to the point now where I feel like taking this machine back to Comet as "not fit for purpose". I wouldn't mind if it even tried to self recover but it doesn't even attempt to do that. It just sits there with frozen video and the sound stream still working for chrissakes!! (knocking Humax on forehead...) Hello Humax! It's a computer! What's wrong with your software engineers making sure that there are non-maskable interrupt routines and crash detection in place so that it can self-reset??? ![]() For me, there are far too many glitches/bugs in the firmware/software for it to be considered "ready for prime time". My Sony HXD860 PVR never suffered from a single glitch like this Foxsat HDR has done... (and trust me, that HXD860 has worked its nuts off for us) It's really not good enough. ![]() [/rant=off] There... I feel a bit better now...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ilkeston
Posts: 18,075
|
Quote:
I wasn't implying that it wasn't "good" picture quality... It just wasn't FULL HD... (I doubt that it was on SkyHD either...) For clues to whether something is upscaled or not, check out close ups of the skin texture on people's faces when possible... In TRUE HD, you can see every pimple, blemish or even hair clearly. For upscaled, the skin takes on a sort of mottled effect and the pimples/blemishes blurr...
For me, it's either HD or it isn't and upscaled SD in my book, in no way is HD. Maybe I've just got fussy eyes... Anyone who has seen HD (broadcast or Blu) realises that the source master is critical to creating a HD master for domestic use. There is nothing strange about a studio master being used to create a HD master by a simple scan process with no attempt to do a basic clean up or let alone fully restore the source material. We see very obvious differences in Blu-ray quality thanks to the variations in the source masters used (both deliberate and due to economic or storage issues) or the money spent on prepping them for conversion. A poor quality master can provide a good HD re-mastering with the same result as a good master and it simply being upscaled taking into account all factors. A poor HD broadcast does not mean upscaled, it would much easier if it did for everyone from the videophile to the average currys customer to understand ![]() I flicked the move on for a few minues as my first ITVHD broadcast via the SKY+HD (seen them via the PC before) to the plasma. It certainly wasn't impressive but too many variables to simply state it's upscaled especially given how many times ITVHD have dumped previous HD listings infavour of an SD broadcast. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Worcester
Posts: 4,185
|
Quote:
What's the red button service, when I select an ITV programme that's available in HD if offers me the option to record it, much like BBC 1, am I missing something?
Woolflynorm |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Black Hill Tx
Posts: 742
|
Quote:
I flicked the move on for a few minues as my first ITVHD broadcast via the SKY+HD (seen them via the PC before) to the plasma. It certainly wasn't impressive but too many variables to simply state it's upscaled especially given how many times ITVHD have dumped previous HD listings infavour of an SD broadcast.
I have yet to view a poor quality BBC high definition broadcast, so they would be exempt
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ilkeston
Posts: 18,075
|
Quote:
Well, you know what? Then I would scream louder at ITV and say "get the heck out of HD then if you can't do it properly and stop giving people a poor and misleading impression of how good HD really can be!" and repeat it to anyone doing the same...
I have yet to view a poor quality BBC high definition broadcast, so they would be exempt ![]() Valid point ![]() The problem of course with bought content is that you are pretty much reliant on what is offered, huge amounts of catalogue content is simply scanned and dumped on the market so does a broadcaster ignore that and simply show movies from the last few years (even those have elements that some consider wrong) or just those that have been remastered? Blu-ray is exactly the same as the market is awash with comparatively poor catalogue titles compared to some reference new or remastered releases. The BBC have been criticised as much as anyone for their HD quality since 2006, it seems to have improved over the last few months but that could be simply down to the current crop of productions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Crawley, W Sussex
Posts: 5,556
|
Comparing the PQ on ITV1 and ITVHD through satellite system was like chalk and cheese.
It might not have been the best ever HD PQ I have seen - but a vast improvement on the SD PQ. As previous posts have suggested, in my experience Movies can vary tremendoudly in PQ even in HD! |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Black Hill Tx
Posts: 742
|
Quote:
Comparing the PQ on ITV1 and ITVHD through satellite system was like chalk and cheese.
It might not have been the best ever HD PQ I have seen - but a vast improvement on the SD PQ. As previous posts have suggested, in my experience Movies can vary tremendoudly in PQ even in HD! I guess my own problem is that I have "raised the bar" kind of high for the standard I expect to see with every HD broadcast now and that has been based on a live true HD broadcast and the aforementioned skin complexion tones but also, I now expect to be able to discern a single blade of grass from a distance!
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Co. Donegal
Posts: 797
|
Quote:
... I now expect to be able to discern a single blade of grass from a distance!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Black Hill Tx
Posts: 742
|
Quote:
... and see the veining in it
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 709
|
Quote:
(BBC HD seems to record VERY reliably)
It's now got to the point where my wife refuses to record on the Humax if its something she really doesn't want to miss and frankly, I don't blame her. For me, there are far too many glitches/bugs in the firmware/software for it to be considered "ready for prime time". My Sony HXD860 PVR never suffered from a single glitch like this Foxsat HDR has done... (and trust me, that HXD860 has worked its nuts off for us) It's really not good enough. ![]() [/rant=off] There... I feel a bit better now... I have had the occasional failed recording but it is the exception to the rule in my experience, and my scheduled recordings extend into three pages! Are all you failed recordings or problems only on ITV as you state BBC HD is ok? ITV do seem to be making progress as the Ukraine footie was excellent for me and my Billy Connolly recordings all worked. Thus I would guess you problems may be EPG related rather than Humax. As an aside for the first time today I saw the guide change before my eyes today due to the F1 coverage alteration. So the system does seem to work if it gets the right data ..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,551
|
Quote:
I don't even know why Channel 4 bothers with its HD channel to be honest... From what I've seen of it (in non-Freesat mode on the HDR ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Black Hill Tx
Posts: 742
|
Quote:
How do you get it in non-freesat mode? I thought it was scrambled.
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:54.







