• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • The Apprentice
My Gaydar goes offscale with James..
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
lolly-licker
19-04-2009
Originally Posted by elpaw:
“Nick is openly gay

This is quite possibly the gayest series of TA ever.”

Nick can't be gay!


...what about Margaret?
elpaw
19-04-2009
I could swear I've read it somewhere, but I can't find anything on it, so I take it back. Sorry Nick.
Digital Sid
19-04-2009
Originally Posted by elpaw:
“I could swear I've read it somewhere, but I can't find anything on it, so I take it back. Sorry Nick.”

I just did a thorough google search, nothing.

Sir Alan clearly doesn't like hiring women, but I think that's more sexism than homosexuality .
pulltheotherone
19-04-2009
Sir Alan has always struck me as asexual for some reason. I just get the impression he would rather be doing business deals than getting jiggy with Lady Sugar. Both Sir Alan and Nick strike me as not liking women very much but Margaret on the other hand....
Digital Sid
19-04-2009
Originally Posted by pulltheotherone:
“Sir Alan has always struck me as asexual for some reason. I just get the impression he would rather be doing business deals than getting jiggy with Lady Sugar. Both Sir Alan and Nick strike me as not liking women very much but Margaret on the other hand....”

He's moneysexual .

Plus nah I think he's straight otherwise why bother getting married if your not interested in sex ?

And why hire Michelle Dewberry over the obviously superior Ruth Badger other than for the reason Ruth was a bit.. blokish .
lady_xanax
19-04-2009
Originally Posted by soilhoof:
“If you walked around the corner in your street to be confronted by a massive neon arrow with 'Gay' emblazoned on it, pointing at a pulsating mound of men, all resembling Randy the Cowboy from 'The Village People', using each and evry orifice they found for their own personal pleasure, that would still only be farctionally gay compared to the vibe Ben emanates.”

Ha ha!

Don't think James is gay. Poor thing- he's just a bit sensitive.
Noorul...maybe. Some sort of History Boys type thing.

Did anyone think that Rocky looked a bit 80's?
lady_xanax
19-04-2009
Originally Posted by lolly-licker:
“Nick can't be gay!


...what about Margaret?”

They would make such a lovely couple
lolly-licker
19-04-2009
Originally Posted by lady_xanax:
“They would make such a lovely couple ”

Nooooo nick's mine!
Esqualita
19-04-2009
Originally Posted by Digital Sid:
“Surely that's slanderous?

Surely if indeed he is (and I don't think he is at all) then he should be allowed to be the judge of that and announce that himself?

EDIT - Just seen the pics and mention of a gaydar profile, either way, if he doesn't want to speak about it / let people know it's his business.”


It's only slanderous if you think that being gay is a dirty, disgusting thing. Which obviously I don't- being a big, hairy willy lover.
In the same vein I don't go running to the nearest lawyer when people mistake me for a hettie.
delectable
19-04-2009
Originally Posted by GratingCheese:
“Ben is gay; it's already being discussed in the other thread.

His gaydar profile was found. However, it was removed not long after the OP of the other thread posted it. Nevertheless, I managed to recover his pictures on the site from my history:

http://s589.photobucket.com/albums/ss337/gratingcheese/”

Lol, that isnt Ben!
funkycub
19-04-2009
No - James
No - Ben
Yes- Howard and knew instantly the moment he was on screen.
Esqualita
19-04-2009
Funkycub-your gaydar is failing you. Ben screamed Pink Pwincess at me as soon as I saw him!!!!!!
peely
19-04-2009
Originally Posted by Digital Sid:
“Noorul - I think he is too, but he might just be camp. I'm not the most masculine of men in terms of personality and I'm straight.

Philip - Don't see it myself. If he was trying too hard to be lad-ish he wouldn't be as open about his metro side.

Plus love how every remaining candidate has shown up on at least one person's gaydar here. Either gay guys are very good business men or the apprentice producers are selecting candidates from gaydar .

What about Nick and Sir Alan, straight or gay? ”

lol....I'm not the most feminine of females, preferring to do rock climbing, appearing a bit butch, I don't wear make up or dresses. I go out on my own a lot, so people probably make the wrong assumptions about me.

However, I'm married and have two daughters (not that that necessarily means anything), but I've never wanted or contemplated a relationship with a woman (other than as friends), and all my fantasies are about men.

I don't think either Nick or Sir Alan are gay. Margaret I'm not sure about, but as I state above, appearances can be deceptive.

As far as stating that someone is gay, which could well be slanderous, perhaps it would be less rude and safer to precede what y'all say with "I think...".
funkycub
19-04-2009
Originally Posted by Esqualita:
“Funkycub-your gaydar is failing you. Ben screamed Pink Pwincess at me as soon as I saw him!!!!!!”

No, no no!!!!
funkycub
19-04-2009
Originally Posted by Esqualita:
“Funkycub-your gaydar is failing you. Ben screamed Pink Pwincess at me as soon as I saw him!!!!!!”

I did check to see if he was on facebook tho!
peely
19-04-2009
Originally Posted by peely:
“lol....I'm not the most feminine of females, preferring to do rock climbing, appearing a bit butch, I don't wear make up or dresses. I go out on my own a lot, so people probably make the wrong assumptions about me.

However, I'm married and have two daughters (not that that necessarily means anything), but I've never wanted or contemplated a relationship with a woman (other than as friends), and all my fantasies are about men.

I don't think either Nick or Sir Alan are gay. Margaret I'm not sure about, but as I state above, appearances can be deceptive.

As far as stating that someone is gay, which may be seen as slanderous, perhaps it would be less rude and safer to precede what y'all say with "I think...".”

I thought I'd add to my post, to say, its probably a good thing that other thread was stopped. However, I think children should be brought up to be independent and responsible, not be forced to have the opinion of their parents. We don't own our children, we should be trying to nurture them into being adults who can stick up for themselves, but treat other people as individuals. On that basis it doesn't matter about someone's sexuality or race.

I don't get it perfect, but the above is what I try to aim for.
Digital Sid
20-04-2009
Originally Posted by Esqualita:
“It's only slanderous if you think that being gay is a dirty, disgusting thing. Which obviously I don't- being a big, hairy willy lover.
In the same vein I don't go running to the nearest lawyer when people mistake me for a hettie.”

slander

• noun. the action or crime of making a false spoken statement damaging to a person’s reputation.

(from the compact oxford dictionary)

Are you sure? Surely somebody saying you ARE something rather than they THINK you are something without

- proof
- permission
- confirmation

and, judging by the speedy profile deletion.. against their wishes is slanderous.
Angrysquirrel
20-04-2009
Originally Posted by Digital Sid:
“slander

• noun. the action or crime of making a false spoken statement damaging to a person’s reputation.

(from the compact oxford dictionary)

Are you sure? Surely somebody saying you ARE something rather than they THINK you are something without

- proof
- permission
- confirmation

and, judging by the speedy profile deletion.. against their wishes is slanderous.”

It is not slanderous to call someone gay.

The law recognises that society has moved on, even if you do not.
Digital Sid
20-04-2009
Originally Posted by Angrysquirrel:
“It is not slanderous to call someone gay.

The law recognises that society has moved on, even if you do not.”

What are you on about?

He's not out, obviously isn't ready to come out and there's no proof other than a profile that may but may not be (though probably is) him.

Surely that makes it a false claim and is damaging to his reputation amongst homophobic friends, family, colleagues and associates? and thus slightly slanderous?

Even if it doesn't, I think his obvious wishes should be respected and we should stick to "think he is" rather than "he is".

I do recognise that society has moved on, but your wrong if you think that it can't do harm to a person's life to out them against their will, potentially, in front of less moved on associates of his.
Digital Sid
27-04-2009
What about our Margaret .
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map