|
||||||||
The Apprentice UK Series 5 - Episode 5 - BBC 1 (9-10pm) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#776 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia ♂
Posts: 19,829
|
Quote:
Noorul's never going to be fired, is he? He'll just be there until the end, noticed by nobody.
SAS: I'm please to say XXX your hired! congrats and lights get turned off what about me? SAS: Noooral???!!??? you're still here??? |
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#777 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12,080
|
Quote:
Noorul's never going to be fired, is he? He'll just be there until the end, noticed by nobody.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#778 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,456
|
Noorul to win! Can you imagine Al's face if he was stuck with him
|
|
|
|
|
|
#779 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,728
|
Nurofen!
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#780 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,492
|
If you think an idea is rubbish and you say so, why should you be blamed when you are proven right? Oh no - on BBC 2 they're supporting Phil! He was awful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#781 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: LFLF Research Div
Posts: 49,392
|
OMG, Pantsman singing again, or what he calls singing.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#782 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 16,143
|
Now the guests are defending Phillip :sleep: But I do agree with Mary, Kim should have brought Noorul and Mona in to the BR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#783 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Derby
Posts: 7,120
|
Quote:
Forum Support to complain re the ads, and they want people to tell them what they think...
Pants to the ads too I say! ![]() Thx, I'll have a look later to find it, it really is a stupid thing, makes the threads unloadable, have to keep refreshing. |
|
|
|
|
#784 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Liverpool.
Posts: 476
|
What are these "experts"???? According to them, they wouldn't have brought Phil into the boardroom? The idea was pants!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#785 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,962
|
Quote:
OMG, Pantsman singing again, or what he calls singing.
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#786 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North West London
Posts: 7,441
|
I agree with Mary's comments about Howard and Noorul.
Ooooh... Phil and Kate..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#787 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: HERE - EVENT_CHILLY
Posts: 8,543
|
The right person got fired. Bringing Lorraine and Phillip in was totally wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#788 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 34,106
|
Quote:
Now the guests are defending Phillip :sleep: But I do agree with Mary, Kim should have brought Noorul and Mona in to the BR.
Like that guy said, it wasn't about how good the ad was, it was about how good the idea was and the idea was rubbish! I think she should have brought Noorul in instead of Lorraine though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#789 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 16,143
|
Jenny
Howard is one of the few candidates I can take seriously. Thank God he's NOT a stereotype! |
|
|
|
|
|
#790 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: bournemouth
Posts: 65,105
|
Kimberley should have brought Noorul in. Sir Alan would have fired him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#791 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: bournemouth
Posts: 65,105
|
Quote:
Please....! He prefers to be called 'Bono'.....:sleep:
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#792 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12,080
|
Jenny Eclair is making me want death.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#793 |
|
Guest
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 81,655
|
Quote:
Jenny
Howard is one of the few candidates I can take seriously. Thank God he's NOT a stereotype! And he has pretty pretty eyes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#794 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London
Posts: 12,939
|
Quote:
Kimberley should have brought Noorul in. Sir Alan would have fired him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#795 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,962
|
Quote:
And he creates perfection in just one take.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#796 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 16,143
|
Quote:
I think she was right to bring Phil in. He was too aggressive at pushing his rubbish idea forward, which is ultimatly why they failed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#797 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North West London
Posts: 7,441
|
SA: "so full of herself... did nothing"
Eh, you changed your mind when it comes to people going under the radar. And Phil was also full of himself. And Kim was spot on with her view that she didn't come in to play games or bitch, etc... |
|
|
|
|
|
#798 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,962
|
I'm so glad that Natalie Appl....sorry......KATE....won this week - but like Mary said - he getting it on with Philip make me question her judgement!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#799 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 34,106
|
Quote:
Sure he is aggressive but what was he going to do if Kim went over his head? Moan? Yes, but that's it. At the end of the day Kim can't put all the blame on Phillip for an idea that she chose to go with, because doing so completely undermines her skills as PM.
By contrast, the other team were open to other peoples ideas and Phil wasn't, throwing a strop everytime he didn't get his own way. |
|
|
|
|
|
#800 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,660
|
Kate is not that pretty . . . or maybe its just me.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:40.





