I remember a while ago, the chart powers that be (whoever decides such things) bringing in rules about how long tracks could be on a single, and how many tracks could be on a single, else the single got banned from the charts (I suspect mainly to boost sales of pop, and hit sales of dance records, although it was sold as being to bring down the cost of singles - sure worked, didnt it

).
Its propably been suggested before, but it would be a nice if there were similar rules put in place on the overuse of covers.
My idea would be something like:
Only one in, say, 5 to 10 of any artists single releases can be a cover, else said infinging single gets banned from the charts (and perhaps they should have to release 5 singles before a cover is allowed - although charity records should be exculded).
Only two covers should be allowed per album, else the album gets banned from the album charts.
This would be a good compromise I think, instead of banning covers completely, and I'm sure this would boost new music, and give a boost to songwriters. Of course it wouldn' cure all ills, such as soundalikes (the girls aloud wonderwall clone springs to mind).
I guess it would have a fat chance of happening, to much pressure exerted to stop much an idea. Covers are such easy money, in a (relatively) struggling industry.
P.S. Big Brovas are at it again too (although I thought their first cover was good)